Micah

This morning we are jumping into a brand new series simply called James, where we're going through the book of James in the Bible. The book of James is one of my favorite books, mostly because James tells it like it is, man. Like, James is blunt. He just kicks you in the teeth, and I need that. Subtlety doesn't work for me. I need you to just tell me what I need to do and tell me how I've messed up. And that's exactly what James does. So I'm excited to go through it with you. Another thing about the book of James that I like to share, because I think it's a really well-made point. It's not mine. It's a pastor named Andy Stanley. James is the half-brother of Jesus. And he ends up writing a book of the Bible and is one of the leaders, along with Peter, of the early church. He's like the very first early church father. So James believed that Jesus was the Son of God. Those of you with brothers or sisters, what would it take for them to convince you that God sent them from above and they came to die on a cross and save the whole world? Like what would it take for you to believe your brother or your sister when they said that? Because James believes that, that's pretty good evidence that Jesus was who he says he was, right? That's Andy Stanley's point, not mine, but it's a good reason to listen to James. As we approach the book of James, I'm actually going to share a video with you guys. There's a group called The Bible Project online. If you don't know about them, you should. They make tons of great videos that explain books of the Bible. You can find one for almost any book of the Bible. Just go to Bible Project. You can Google it. If you're at home right now, don't go yet. I'm about to show you a video. Please stay locked in here. But they make books, they make videos about the books of the Bible and about themes in the Bible. It's a tremendous way to begin to understand and approach Scripture. And I thought the one that they made for James was so good that as we kicked off the series, it was the best possible way to kind of prime us for what to expect. It's a little bit longer of a video. It's about eight minutes long. So settle in and buckle up, and we're going to watch this intro video to James together. Here you go. I hope that you enjoyed that. If the biggest thing that you get out of this Sunday, honestly, is to use that more in your personal life, I'm good with that. It's a really, really good resource. So I hope that you appreciated that video and how easy it is to kind of make the whole book approachable now as we read it. If you don't have a reading plan, you can grab one on the way out or we have them online on our live page. This week is set up just like chapter one is. You can see from the video that chapter one's kind of a setup for the rest of the book and the themes and the things that we need to be familiar with so that we can understand it and apply it to ourselves as we move through the book, and in this case, as we move through the series. And so that's what I want to try to do this morning, is pull out the themes and help us set up some parameters around what we're going to talk about for the remaining five weeks of the series. This is going to be a six-week series that's actually going to carry us into Advent. I'm really excited for our Christmas series that we're already working on that we've got coming up. So this is going to carry us all the way through to Thanksgiving. One of the things in the video that I wanted to point out that I thought could help us approach the overarching point of the book of James is that idea of perfection and living lives as our whole selves versus living lives, they called it in the video, as our compromised selves. I think that this is something that we can all relate to. In chapter one, they said that through the book of James that this word perfect or whole appears seven times and that James is writing to push us in that direction. And I think that we can relate to a need to be made whole in that way because many of us know what it is to live disjointed lives, right? I feel like if you're a believer for any amount of time, you know what it is to live a life that doesn't feel all the way in sync. You see a version of yourself that you know that God created you to be. I know that I can walk in that obedience. I see who he wants me to be, and yet I continue to walk in this direction and be this person that I don't want to be, but I keep getting pulled in that direction. We know what it is to come to church on a Sunday, maybe have a good experience, be moved by the worship, which I was this morning, that was great. Be moved by the worship. Be moved by the sermon. Feel a closeness to Jesus. Feel like it was a sweet moment. And then Monday morning you wake up and you go crack skulls at work. Monday morning you wake up and you forget that yesterday was a sweet moment. Maybe it doesn't even make it to the next day. Maybe you had a sweet moment and then in the car the wife says the thing that you don't want her to say and then you're off to the races, right? And there goes that peace and harmony. You know what it is to wake up in the morning, to have a quiet time, to devote some time to God, to spend time in God's Word, to spend time in prayer, and on that very same day lose your mind with your co-workers or your kids or your spouse. We know what it is to have a habit or a hang-up that we say, I'm done with this. I'm not doing this anymore. This has owned my life and has displeased God and displeased me for too long. I'm drawing a line in the sand. I'm not doing this anymore. And then maybe we added in some controls and some accountability and we asked people to help us out. And we took this stand. I'm going to live as that person finally. And then a day or a week or a month later, we do the same thing. And we live as the version of ourselves that we don't like, that Jesus died to save us from. But for some reason, we continue to go back there. I think we all relate to what I find to be one of the most encouraging passages in Scripture in Romans chapter 7 when Paul writes, he says, the things that I want to do, I do not do. The things that I do not want to do, I do. So he's talking about this tension. I see the things that I want to do. I see the person who I want to become. I want to do those things, but for some reason I can't walk in that life totally. And then I see this person that I don't want to be. I don't want to make these choices, but I can't stop myself from making those choices. The things that I want to do, I do not do. The things that I do not want to do, I do. And then he finishes off at the end of chapter seven with this great verse. He says in declaration, oh, wretched man that I am, who will deliver me from this body of death? I've taken the time a couple of times in my life to read all the way through the book of Romans from start to finish, it's great for plane rides, I always stop at that verse and just kind of go, thank you God for Paul and for his experience of this too. Oh wretched man that I am who will deliver me from this body of death? Because we know what it is to feel out of sync. The Bible calls it our new self and our old self. That our old self was crucified with Christ and it no longer lives and now Jesus lives in me and we're free to walk in this new self but there is this part of the world that continues to drag us down and make us less than whole. And it's this that James writes to address. He writes to the church, and I believe that the reason that James writes the letter is to help us pursue wholeness. James is written to help us pursue wholeness. That wholeness that is walking in the person that God created us to be, walking in the person that Jesus made it possible to be in the first place through his death, walking as that person, walking in that wholeness. He wants us to no longer live these disjointed, out of sync, incomplete lives. I think we'll see that's why he wrote the whole book. His goal is, some people call it maturity, others call it wholeness. He calls it perfection or completion. His goal is to help us get there. We understand that the only way there is through Christ, but we also understand that in this earth, on this side of eternity, that God asks us to obey. He asks us to walk and to follow. And in doing that, we will grow into mature versions of ourselves and to who God wants us to be. And so James writes to help us pursue that wholeness. And I think that's true because of this passage, chapter 1. If you have a Bible, you can open it. If you have one at home, open one there, and you should have the scriptures in your notes. But I'd love for you guys to be interacting with the Bible and with the chapter and see how it all ties together. But if someone were to ask me, point me to the synopsis verses on why James is even written. What is James trying to do? I would take you here. This is where I think he's trying to help us pursue wholeness. Chapter 1, verses 22 through 25 why James writes the book. Because he wants us to be doers who act. He wants us to persevere. He says we shouldn't be like, again, it's this imagery of two versions of ourselves. Don't be the person that looks at the law of God. He calls it the perfect law of liberty, which I love that phrase because God's word was not given to us to constrain us, but to offer us liberty. And that perfect liberty, that perfect law of liberty is Christ. He is the word of God. And he rewrote the law of the Old Testament to say, go and love others as I have loved you. Love God and love others. That's how Jesus rewrites and summarizes the law correctly. And he says that there's one version of us that we stare at the law, we see what it says, we hear it, we pay attention to sermons, maybe we listen to podcasts, we talk with friends about spiritual things, we have our ears open. We hear the word, but then we go and we don't do it. We live lives as those disjointed versions of ourselves. He says, when you do that, you're like somebody who looks at your face in the mirror and then walks away and you forget what you look like. He said, but if you'll gaze into the perfect law of liberty and persevere in doing it, then you will be blessed in your doing. And so I think the answer to our question, James says first, we say first that James writes to help us pursue holiness. So the question becomes, okay, James, how do I pursue holiness? Well, he tells us in these verses, we pursue wholeness by persevering in doing. We pursue wholeness, that complete version of ourselves, by persevering in doing. So that, I think, as a summary statement, begs two questions. Why does James feel it necessary to highlight persevering? Why does he put that out front? Why does he open up the book with it? It's the very first thing, once he starts writing. He says, hey guys, how you doing? And then he starts talking about how pain is going to happen. Why is it that James says right away, if you want to live as a whole self and you need to persevere, because he's communicating this idea of you're going to want to quit. It's going to be really hard. It's kind of a terrible selling point for James. So why does he start there? And then what does doing look like? What are we supposed to be doing? So as we answer those questions, the first question, why persevering? Well, we persevere because life requires it. We persevere because life requires it. James is aware of this reality. Like I said, it's how he starts his letter. Literally, verse 1, James, the servant of God and the Lord Jesus Christ to the 12 tribes and the dispersion. Greetings, which means the Hebrew people who have dispersed outside of Israel. You also refer to it as a diaspora. Then, verse 2, count it all joy, my brothers, when you meet trials of various kinds. He says, hey, how you doing? Haven't seen you in a while. Listen, life's going to stink like a lot, and when it does, just count it joy. Like, that's a terrible opener. James, why are you doing that? But he says, count it all joy, my brothers, when you meet trials of various kinds, for you know the testing of your faith produces steadfastness perseverance instead of steadfastness. But he says, And plenty of people have pointed this out before, but just in case you missed it those times, he doesn't say, if you have trials. He doesn't say, hey, if life gets hard sometimes, not saying it well, but if it does, then hang in there. He says, no, no, when? When you face trials, plural, of all kinds, count them as joy. Why? Because they're going to bear out a perseverance and a steadfastness that's going to make us perfect and complete, not lacking anything. It's this idea of being a whole person again. So a couple things from that idea and why James introduces it as a theme that shows up throughout the book. We find it again in chapter 5 when he's talking about having patience and doing good. James knows that your faith is going to be challenged. He knows that perseverance is going to be required. He knows that there are going to be couples who struggle mightily with infertility, and all they want is to experience the joy of having their own child. He knows that. And he knows that when that happens, it's going to test their faith, and it's going to make them wonder if God is really good. James knows that we lose people too early. He knew that parents would mourn the loss of children. He knows that. And because he knows that, he knows that it's going to be really easy for those parents in that moment to cry out and say, God, that's not fair. Why'd you let that happen? And that those circumstances would conspire to shipwreck your faith. And so he says, hang in there. Have faith when it's hard. He knows that marriages will end and that diagnoses will come and that abuse will happen and that abandonment is a thing and that loneliness and depression are things that we walk through. He knows that we are going to lose loved ones before we want to. James knows that and he knows that when those things happen, we're going to want to walk away from our faith because it's going to seem like God isn't looking out for us anymore. And he's telling you when that happens and it seems like things are broken, hang on, persevere, continue in faith, Continue to obey. And when you do, it will make you perfect and complete, not lacking anything. This is the real reason for perseverance. Those of you whose faith has seen that test, those of you who have walked through a season in your life where something happened that was so hard that it made you doubt if God was really looking out for you, it made you doubt if God really cared about you, it made you question your faith, if you came out of that clinging on to your faith, you know it is all the stronger. I was actually talking with someone this last week about this idea, and we just kind of noted, I noted, I don't really trust someone's faith very much until it's been through tragedy. Until it's been hardened in that kiln, I just don't trust it yet. There is something to the people who have walked through tragedy and yet have this faith that they cling to that makes it unshakable. Isn't there? I think of somebody who's going to be an elder in the new year, Brad Gwynn. To my recollection, Brad has lost his sister and his brother and his mom. He's, I don't know, in his 60s, maybe late 50s. Sorry, Brad, I don't know. He's been through tragedy. His faith has been through the tests. But if you talk to him about Jesus and about why he believes, it's humbling. It's admirable. I can honestly tell you, I don't know if I want faith that strong because I don't want to walk through what he has to walk through to have it. But I want faith that strong. James knows, if you cling to your faith through trial, if you cling to Jesus and continue to obey him even when it's hard, that it will produce this completion in us. It will produce this firm, unshakable faith that cannot be shaken, that cannot be torn down. So he opens with, hey, hang in there. Because when you do, you're going to be stronger for it. So if we're supposed to hang in there, if we're supposed to continue to obey, even when it's hard, what is it that we're supposed to do? What does doing look like, right? What does God want from us? What does he expect from us? James is setting something up for the rest of the book to go through, like, here's some simple ways to obey. If you really want to please God, then here's a simple way to do it. If you really want to walk as that person, then these are the things that you need to be doing. These are the things that you need to be paying attention to. The question becomes, what does it look like to do? And I think he answers this question by saying, doing looks like helping the needy and pursuing holiness. Doing, obeying God, walking as a whole person, looks like helping the needy and pursuing holiness. Here's why I think this. Look at verse 27. Religion that is pure and undefiled before God the Father is this, to visit orphans and widows in their affliction and to keep oneself unstained from the world. Religion that is pure and undefiled before God. You want to do what God wants you to do? You want to live out your faith? You want to live as a whole person? Then here's what you need to do. Care for the widows and the orphan and their affliction and keep yourself unstained from the world. Help the needy and pursue holiness. That's a synopsis for everything that comes in the rest of the book. Everything that comes in the rest of the book is telling you, here's the heart conditions you need to help the needy. Here's why you should do that. Here's why it's near to God's heart. Everything that happens in the rest of the book is, here's what you do. If you want to pursue holiness, then here's how you do it. And this is a theme throughout the Bible. In Isaiah chapter one, we see the very same thing. He distills, Isaiah distills it all down. God says, you want to make me happy? Care for the widows and the orphans. Pursue me. That's what you need to do. Micah says that we should seek justice, love mercy, and to walk humbly with God. It's all through Scripture. So if we want to persevere in doing, what does doing look like? Doing looks like helping the needy and pursuing holiness. And when I say helping the needy, I really do mean that because in that culture, you've heard me teach this before, but for those who may have missed it or have joined recently, when we see widows and orphans in the Bible, what we need to understand is that in that culture, that was the least of these. Widows were typically older women who had no way to make any money. So if their husband had passed away and now they're living as single women and they don't have families to care for them, there is very little they can do besides beg for sustenance every day. They are the most exposed and endangered and vulnerable in that culture. Likewise, orphans are the most exposed and vulnerable in that culture. There's no welfare. There's no orphanages. There's no Social security, there's no public medicine, there's none of that. They're just on their own. And God says, my people should have a heart to care for those who can't care for themselves. My people should have a heart to care for those in the greatest need. That's why at Grace we partner with Faith Ministry down in Mexico that builds homes for people who can't afford their own homes because they work in a Panasonic factory for less than a dollar a day. So we send money down there and build them homes and go down there in teams every year to love the least of these, to care for those who can't care for themselves. We heard earlier Mikey talk about Addis Jamari, who literally cares for orphans in Ethiopia. As girls age out of the orphanages and have no life skills and nothing to do with themselves, they take them into a home, teach them skills, send them back to school, and give them a path forward. And now they work with families on the front end of it so that when they have new babies and they don't know what to do and they're too poor to afford these babies, they give them materials and they give them training and they give them money so that they don't have to turn those kids into orphans but they can grow up in good solid homes. That's why we partner with them. That's why so many people at our church are all into a seat at the table downtown where it's a pay what you can restaurant so that you can go and have your meal and leave a token behind so that someone else can have a meal too if they can't afford it. Caring for the needy is near and dear to God's heart. And I would say to you this, if you're a believer and a part of your regular behavior and pattern isn't to care for those in need, then I don't think you're doing all that God has for you to do. I don't think it's possible to say, I'm walking in lockstep with Jesus. I'm being exactly who he created to me. I love him with my whole heart. I spend my days with him. I commune with God in prayer and yet still not help the needy. It's one of the first things that shows up in every teaching in scripture that if you love God, you'll help those who can't help themselves. Not only should we be about this as a church, we need to be about this as individuals. If you call yourself a Christian, if you claim God as your Father and Jesus as your Savior and that's not a part of your pattern, I would encourage you to find a way to make that a part of your pattern. There's a part of God that we find in doing that work. It's who His children are designed to be. And then He tells us that we should pursue holiness. Keep yourself unstained from this world. The word holy simply means different or other. In Scripture we're told to be holy as God is holy. And it's this command, it's this acknowledgement. Listen, you're different. You're different than the world. You're not better than the world. We're cut from the same cloth. You know Jesus, and the world doesn't yet know Jesus. That's the difference. You're not better than anybody, but you're different than them. And we're called to be different than the world. We're called to laugh at different jokes. We're called to post different political memes, if any at all, ever. We're called to argue differently in the public square. We're called to behave differently than them. We're called to love differently than the world. We're called to watch different things than what they watch. We're called to different standards than what they're called to. Personal holiness matters a lot. And James says, if you want to be a whole person, then persevere in doing. And what does doing look like? It looks like helping the needy and pursuing holiness. Now listen, we're holy because Jesus has made us holy. We're already there because Jesus has died for us and we are clothed in his righteousness. However, in this life, the Bible reminds us over and over again that we are to obey. And obeying takes our effort. So as far as it depends on us, we help the needy and we pursue holiness. And the rest of the book is about really unpacking that idea. What are the heart conditions that exist around helping those who can't help themselves? And what does it look like to live holy and unstained in this world? So I hope that that will serve as a good primer to get you ready for the rest of the book of James. Next week we come back with probably the easiest thing to do. It's why we're starting off with it, taming the tongue. And then we're going to move on to the rest of the book. I'm really looking forward to going through this book with you guys. I'm going to pray for us and then we will be dismissed. Father, you're good to us. My goodness. You're good to us and we're not good to you. You remain faithful to us when we are faithless. God, you watch us live our disjointed lives. And you're patient with us, and you're gentle, and you're loving. Father, I pray that as we go through this series, that everybody who hears it or preaches it, God would just have their heart enlivened to this idea of walking wholly with you. Of walking in lockstep with Jesus. Give us visions of actually being the people that you created us to be, of leaving behind our disjointed selves. Give us the honesty to identify where we're not obedient, and give us the courage to walk in the obedience that you show us. It's in your Son's name we pray these things. Amen.

This morning we are jumping into a brand new series simply called James, where we're going through the book of James in the Bible. The book of James is one of my favorite books, mostly because James tells it like it is, man. Like, James is blunt. He just kicks you in the teeth, and I need that. Subtlety doesn't work for me. I need you to just tell me what I need to do and tell me how I've messed up. And that's exactly what James does. So I'm excited to go through it with you. Another thing about the book of James that I like to share, because I think it's a really well-made point. It's not mine. It's a pastor named Andy Stanley. James is the half-brother of Jesus. And he ends up writing a book of the Bible and is one of the leaders, along with Peter, of the early church. He's like the very first early church father. So James believed that Jesus was the Son of God. Those of you with brothers or sisters, what would it take for them to convince you that God sent them from above and they came to die on a cross and save the whole world? Like what would it take for you to believe your brother or your sister when they said that? Because James believes that, that's pretty good evidence that Jesus was who he says he was, right? That's Andy Stanley's point, not mine, but it's a good reason to listen to James. As we approach the book of James, I'm actually going to share a video with you guys. There's a group called The Bible Project online. If you don't know about them, you should. They make tons of great videos that explain books of the Bible. You can find one for almost any book of the Bible. Just go to Bible Project. You can Google it. If you're at home right now, don't go yet. I'm about to show you a video. Please stay locked in here. But they make books, they make videos about the books of the Bible and about themes in the Bible. It's a tremendous way to begin to understand and approach Scripture. And I thought the one that they made for James was so good that as we kicked off the series, it was the best possible way to kind of prime us for what to expect. It's a little bit longer of a video. It's about eight minutes long. So settle in and buckle up, and we're going to watch this intro video to James together. Here you go. I hope that you enjoyed that. If the biggest thing that you get out of this Sunday, honestly, is to use that more in your personal life, I'm good with that. It's a really, really good resource. So I hope that you appreciated that video and how easy it is to kind of make the whole book approachable now as we read it. If you don't have a reading plan, you can grab one on the way out or we have them online on our live page. This week is set up just like chapter one is. You can see from the video that chapter one's kind of a setup for the rest of the book and the themes and the things that we need to be familiar with so that we can understand it and apply it to ourselves as we move through the book, and in this case, as we move through the series. And so that's what I want to try to do this morning, is pull out the themes and help us set up some parameters around what we're going to talk about for the remaining five weeks of the series. This is going to be a six-week series that's actually going to carry us into Advent. I'm really excited for our Christmas series that we're already working on that we've got coming up. So this is going to carry us all the way through to Thanksgiving. One of the things in the video that I wanted to point out that I thought could help us approach the overarching point of the book of James is that idea of perfection and living lives as our whole selves versus living lives, they called it in the video, as our compromised selves. I think that this is something that we can all relate to. In chapter one, they said that through the book of James that this word perfect or whole appears seven times and that James is writing to push us in that direction. And I think that we can relate to a need to be made whole in that way because many of us know what it is to live disjointed lives, right? I feel like if you're a believer for any amount of time, you know what it is to live a life that doesn't feel all the way in sync. You see a version of yourself that you know that God created you to be. I know that I can walk in that obedience. I see who he wants me to be, and yet I continue to walk in this direction and be this person that I don't want to be, but I keep getting pulled in that direction. We know what it is to come to church on a Sunday, maybe have a good experience, be moved by the worship, which I was this morning, that was great. Be moved by the worship. Be moved by the sermon. Feel a closeness to Jesus. Feel like it was a sweet moment. And then Monday morning you wake up and you go crack skulls at work. Monday morning you wake up and you forget that yesterday was a sweet moment. Maybe it doesn't even make it to the next day. Maybe you had a sweet moment and then in the car the wife says the thing that you don't want her to say and then you're off to the races, right? And there goes that peace and harmony. You know what it is to wake up in the morning, to have a quiet time, to devote some time to God, to spend time in God's Word, to spend time in prayer, and on that very same day lose your mind with your co-workers or your kids or your spouse. We know what it is to have a habit or a hang-up that we say, I'm done with this. I'm not doing this anymore. This has owned my life and has displeased God and displeased me for too long. I'm drawing a line in the sand. I'm not doing this anymore. And then maybe we added in some controls and some accountability and we asked people to help us out. And we took this stand. I'm going to live as that person finally. And then a day or a week or a month later, we do the same thing. And we live as the version of ourselves that we don't like, that Jesus died to save us from. But for some reason, we continue to go back there. I think we all relate to what I find to be one of the most encouraging passages in Scripture in Romans chapter 7 when Paul writes, he says, the things that I want to do, I do not do. The things that I do not want to do, I do. So he's talking about this tension. I see the things that I want to do. I see the person who I want to become. I want to do those things, but for some reason I can't walk in that life totally. And then I see this person that I don't want to be. I don't want to make these choices, but I can't stop myself from making those choices. The things that I want to do, I do not do. The things that I do not want to do, I do. And then he finishes off at the end of chapter seven with this great verse. He says in declaration, oh, wretched man that I am, who will deliver me from this body of death? I've taken the time a couple of times in my life to read all the way through the book of Romans from start to finish, it's great for plane rides, I always stop at that verse and just kind of go, thank you God for Paul and for his experience of this too. Oh wretched man that I am who will deliver me from this body of death? Because we know what it is to feel out of sync. The Bible calls it our new self and our old self. That our old self was crucified with Christ and it no longer lives and now Jesus lives in me and we're free to walk in this new self but there is this part of the world that continues to drag us down and make us less than whole. And it's this that James writes to address. He writes to the church, and I believe that the reason that James writes the letter is to help us pursue wholeness. James is written to help us pursue wholeness. That wholeness that is walking in the person that God created us to be, walking in the person that Jesus made it possible to be in the first place through his death, walking as that person, walking in that wholeness. He wants us to no longer live these disjointed, out of sync, incomplete lives. I think we'll see that's why he wrote the whole book. His goal is, some people call it maturity, others call it wholeness. He calls it perfection or completion. His goal is to help us get there. We understand that the only way there is through Christ, but we also understand that in this earth, on this side of eternity, that God asks us to obey. He asks us to walk and to follow. And in doing that, we will grow into mature versions of ourselves and to who God wants us to be. And so James writes to help us pursue that wholeness. And I think that's true because of this passage, chapter 1. If you have a Bible, you can open it. If you have one at home, open one there, and you should have the scriptures in your notes. But I'd love for you guys to be interacting with the Bible and with the chapter and see how it all ties together. But if someone were to ask me, point me to the synopsis verses on why James is even written. What is James trying to do? I would take you here. This is where I think he's trying to help us pursue wholeness. Chapter 1, verses 22 through 25 why James writes the book. Because he wants us to be doers who act. He wants us to persevere. He says we shouldn't be like, again, it's this imagery of two versions of ourselves. Don't be the person that looks at the law of God. He calls it the perfect law of liberty, which I love that phrase because God's word was not given to us to constrain us, but to offer us liberty. And that perfect liberty, that perfect law of liberty is Christ. He is the word of God. And he rewrote the law of the Old Testament to say, go and love others as I have loved you. Love God and love others. That's how Jesus rewrites and summarizes the law correctly. And he says that there's one version of us that we stare at the law, we see what it says, we hear it, we pay attention to sermons, maybe we listen to podcasts, we talk with friends about spiritual things, we have our ears open. We hear the word, but then we go and we don't do it. We live lives as those disjointed versions of ourselves. He says, when you do that, you're like somebody who looks at your face in the mirror and then walks away and you forget what you look like. He said, but if you'll gaze into the perfect law of liberty and persevere in doing it, then you will be blessed in your doing. And so I think the answer to our question, James says first, we say first that James writes to help us pursue holiness. So the question becomes, okay, James, how do I pursue holiness? Well, he tells us in these verses, we pursue wholeness by persevering in doing. We pursue wholeness, that complete version of ourselves, by persevering in doing. So that, I think, as a summary statement, begs two questions. Why does James feel it necessary to highlight persevering? Why does he put that out front? Why does he open up the book with it? It's the very first thing, once he starts writing. He says, hey guys, how you doing? And then he starts talking about how pain is going to happen. Why is it that James says right away, if you want to live as a whole self and you need to persevere, because he's communicating this idea of you're going to want to quit. It's going to be really hard. It's kind of a terrible selling point for James. So why does he start there? And then what does doing look like? What are we supposed to be doing? So as we answer those questions, the first question, why persevering? Well, we persevere because life requires it. We persevere because life requires it. James is aware of this reality. Like I said, it's how he starts his letter. Literally, verse 1, James, the servant of God and the Lord Jesus Christ to the 12 tribes and the dispersion. Greetings, which means the Hebrew people who have dispersed outside of Israel. You also refer to it as a diaspora. Then, verse 2, count it all joy, my brothers, when you meet trials of various kinds. He says, hey, how you doing? Haven't seen you in a while. Listen, life's going to stink like a lot, and when it does, just count it joy. Like, that's a terrible opener. James, why are you doing that? But he says, count it all joy, my brothers, when you meet trials of various kinds, for you know the testing of your faith produces steadfastness perseverance instead of steadfastness. But he says, And plenty of people have pointed this out before, but just in case you missed it those times, he doesn't say, if you have trials. He doesn't say, hey, if life gets hard sometimes, not saying it well, but if it does, then hang in there. He says, no, no, when? When you face trials, plural, of all kinds, count them as joy. Why? Because they're going to bear out a perseverance and a steadfastness that's going to make us perfect and complete, not lacking anything. It's this idea of being a whole person again. So a couple things from that idea and why James introduces it as a theme that shows up throughout the book. We find it again in chapter 5 when he's talking about having patience and doing good. James knows that your faith is going to be challenged. He knows that perseverance is going to be required. He knows that there are going to be couples who struggle mightily with infertility, and all they want is to experience the joy of having their own child. He knows that. And he knows that when that happens, it's going to test their faith, and it's going to make them wonder if God is really good. James knows that we lose people too early. He knew that parents would mourn the loss of children. He knows that. And because he knows that, he knows that it's going to be really easy for those parents in that moment to cry out and say, God, that's not fair. Why'd you let that happen? And that those circumstances would conspire to shipwreck your faith. And so he says, hang in there. Have faith when it's hard. He knows that marriages will end and that diagnoses will come and that abuse will happen and that abandonment is a thing and that loneliness and depression are things that we walk through. He knows that we are going to lose loved ones before we want to. James knows that and he knows that when those things happen, we're going to want to walk away from our faith because it's going to seem like God isn't looking out for us anymore. And he's telling you when that happens and it seems like things are broken, hang on, persevere, continue in faith, Continue to obey. And when you do, it will make you perfect and complete, not lacking anything. This is the real reason for perseverance. Those of you whose faith has seen that test, those of you who have walked through a season in your life where something happened that was so hard that it made you doubt if God was really looking out for you, it made you doubt if God really cared about you, it made you question your faith, if you came out of that clinging on to your faith, you know it is all the stronger. I was actually talking with someone this last week about this idea, and we just kind of noted, I noted, I don't really trust someone's faith very much until it's been through tragedy. Until it's been hardened in that kiln, I just don't trust it yet. There is something to the people who have walked through tragedy and yet have this faith that they cling to that makes it unshakable. Isn't there? I think of somebody who's going to be an elder in the new year, Brad Gwynn. To my recollection, Brad has lost his sister and his brother and his mom. He's, I don't know, in his 60s, maybe late 50s. Sorry, Brad, I don't know. He's been through tragedy. His faith has been through the tests. But if you talk to him about Jesus and about why he believes, it's humbling. It's admirable. I can honestly tell you, I don't know if I want faith that strong because I don't want to walk through what he has to walk through to have it. But I want faith that strong. James knows, if you cling to your faith through trial, if you cling to Jesus and continue to obey him even when it's hard, that it will produce this completion in us. It will produce this firm, unshakable faith that cannot be shaken, that cannot be torn down. So he opens with, hey, hang in there. Because when you do, you're going to be stronger for it. So if we're supposed to hang in there, if we're supposed to continue to obey, even when it's hard, what is it that we're supposed to do? What does doing look like, right? What does God want from us? What does he expect from us? James is setting something up for the rest of the book to go through, like, here's some simple ways to obey. If you really want to please God, then here's a simple way to do it. If you really want to walk as that person, then these are the things that you need to be doing. These are the things that you need to be paying attention to. The question becomes, what does it look like to do? And I think he answers this question by saying, doing looks like helping the needy and pursuing holiness. Doing, obeying God, walking as a whole person, looks like helping the needy and pursuing holiness. Here's why I think this. Look at verse 27. Religion that is pure and undefiled before God the Father is this, to visit orphans and widows in their affliction and to keep oneself unstained from the world. Religion that is pure and undefiled before God. You want to do what God wants you to do? You want to live out your faith? You want to live as a whole person? Then here's what you need to do. Care for the widows and the orphan and their affliction and keep yourself unstained from the world. Help the needy and pursue holiness. That's a synopsis for everything that comes in the rest of the book. Everything that comes in the rest of the book is telling you, here's the heart conditions you need to help the needy. Here's why you should do that. Here's why it's near to God's heart. Everything that happens in the rest of the book is, here's what you do. If you want to pursue holiness, then here's how you do it. And this is a theme throughout the Bible. In Isaiah chapter one, we see the very same thing. He distills, Isaiah distills it all down. God says, you want to make me happy? Care for the widows and the orphans. Pursue me. That's what you need to do. Micah says that we should seek justice, love mercy, and to walk humbly with God. It's all through Scripture. So if we want to persevere in doing, what does doing look like? Doing looks like helping the needy and pursuing holiness. And when I say helping the needy, I really do mean that because in that culture, you've heard me teach this before, but for those who may have missed it or have joined recently, when we see widows and orphans in the Bible, what we need to understand is that in that culture, that was the least of these. Widows were typically older women who had no way to make any money. So if their husband had passed away and now they're living as single women and they don't have families to care for them, there is very little they can do besides beg for sustenance every day. They are the most exposed and endangered and vulnerable in that culture. Likewise, orphans are the most exposed and vulnerable in that culture. There's no welfare. There's no orphanages. There's no Social security, there's no public medicine, there's none of that. They're just on their own. And God says, my people should have a heart to care for those who can't care for themselves. My people should have a heart to care for those in the greatest need. That's why at Grace we partner with Faith Ministry down in Mexico that builds homes for people who can't afford their own homes because they work in a Panasonic factory for less than a dollar a day. So we send money down there and build them homes and go down there in teams every year to love the least of these, to care for those who can't care for themselves. We heard earlier Mikey talk about Addis Jamari, who literally cares for orphans in Ethiopia. As girls age out of the orphanages and have no life skills and nothing to do with themselves, they take them into a home, teach them skills, send them back to school, and give them a path forward. And now they work with families on the front end of it so that when they have new babies and they don't know what to do and they're too poor to afford these babies, they give them materials and they give them training and they give them money so that they don't have to turn those kids into orphans but they can grow up in good solid homes. That's why we partner with them. That's why so many people at our church are all into a seat at the table downtown where it's a pay what you can restaurant so that you can go and have your meal and leave a token behind so that someone else can have a meal too if they can't afford it. Caring for the needy is near and dear to God's heart. And I would say to you this, if you're a believer and a part of your regular behavior and pattern isn't to care for those in need, then I don't think you're doing all that God has for you to do. I don't think it's possible to say, I'm walking in lockstep with Jesus. I'm being exactly who he created to me. I love him with my whole heart. I spend my days with him. I commune with God in prayer and yet still not help the needy. It's one of the first things that shows up in every teaching in scripture that if you love God, you'll help those who can't help themselves. Not only should we be about this as a church, we need to be about this as individuals. If you call yourself a Christian, if you claim God as your Father and Jesus as your Savior and that's not a part of your pattern, I would encourage you to find a way to make that a part of your pattern. There's a part of God that we find in doing that work. It's who His children are designed to be. And then He tells us that we should pursue holiness. Keep yourself unstained from this world. The word holy simply means different or other. In Scripture we're told to be holy as God is holy. And it's this command, it's this acknowledgement. Listen, you're different. You're different than the world. You're not better than the world. We're cut from the same cloth. You know Jesus, and the world doesn't yet know Jesus. That's the difference. You're not better than anybody, but you're different than them. And we're called to be different than the world. We're called to laugh at different jokes. We're called to post different political memes, if any at all, ever. We're called to argue differently in the public square. We're called to behave differently than them. We're called to love differently than the world. We're called to watch different things than what they watch. We're called to different standards than what they're called to. Personal holiness matters a lot. And James says, if you want to be a whole person, then persevere in doing. And what does doing look like? It looks like helping the needy and pursuing holiness. Now listen, we're holy because Jesus has made us holy. We're already there because Jesus has died for us and we are clothed in his righteousness. However, in this life, the Bible reminds us over and over again that we are to obey. And obeying takes our effort. So as far as it depends on us, we help the needy and we pursue holiness. And the rest of the book is about really unpacking that idea. What are the heart conditions that exist around helping those who can't help themselves? And what does it look like to live holy and unstained in this world? So I hope that that will serve as a good primer to get you ready for the rest of the book of James. Next week we come back with probably the easiest thing to do. It's why we're starting off with it, taming the tongue. And then we're going to move on to the rest of the book. I'm really looking forward to going through this book with you guys. I'm going to pray for us and then we will be dismissed. Father, you're good to us. My goodness. You're good to us and we're not good to you. You remain faithful to us when we are faithless. God, you watch us live our disjointed lives. And you're patient with us, and you're gentle, and you're loving. Father, I pray that as we go through this series, that everybody who hears it or preaches it, God would just have their heart enlivened to this idea of walking wholly with you. Of walking in lockstep with Jesus. Give us visions of actually being the people that you created us to be, of leaving behind our disjointed selves. Give us the honesty to identify where we're not obedient, and give us the courage to walk in the obedience that you show us. It's in your Son's name we pray these things. Amen.

This morning we are jumping into a brand new series simply called James, where we're going through the book of James in the Bible. The book of James is one of my favorite books, mostly because James tells it like it is, man. Like, James is blunt. He just kicks you in the teeth, and I need that. Subtlety doesn't work for me. I need you to just tell me what I need to do and tell me how I've messed up. And that's exactly what James does. So I'm excited to go through it with you. Another thing about the book of James that I like to share, because I think it's a really well-made point. It's not mine. It's a pastor named Andy Stanley. James is the half-brother of Jesus. And he ends up writing a book of the Bible and is one of the leaders, along with Peter, of the early church. He's like the very first early church father. So James believed that Jesus was the Son of God. Those of you with brothers or sisters, what would it take for them to convince you that God sent them from above and they came to die on a cross and save the whole world? Like what would it take for you to believe your brother or your sister when they said that? Because James believes that, that's pretty good evidence that Jesus was who he says he was, right? That's Andy Stanley's point, not mine, but it's a good reason to listen to James. As we approach the book of James, I'm actually going to share a video with you guys. There's a group called The Bible Project online. If you don't know about them, you should. They make tons of great videos that explain books of the Bible. You can find one for almost any book of the Bible. Just go to Bible Project. You can Google it. If you're at home right now, don't go yet. I'm about to show you a video. Please stay locked in here. But they make books, they make videos about the books of the Bible and about themes in the Bible. It's a tremendous way to begin to understand and approach Scripture. And I thought the one that they made for James was so good that as we kicked off the series, it was the best possible way to kind of prime us for what to expect. It's a little bit longer of a video. It's about eight minutes long. So settle in and buckle up, and we're going to watch this intro video to James together. Here you go. I hope that you enjoyed that. If the biggest thing that you get out of this Sunday, honestly, is to use that more in your personal life, I'm good with that. It's a really, really good resource. So I hope that you appreciated that video and how easy it is to kind of make the whole book approachable now as we read it. If you don't have a reading plan, you can grab one on the way out or we have them online on our live page. This week is set up just like chapter one is. You can see from the video that chapter one's kind of a setup for the rest of the book and the themes and the things that we need to be familiar with so that we can understand it and apply it to ourselves as we move through the book, and in this case, as we move through the series. And so that's what I want to try to do this morning, is pull out the themes and help us set up some parameters around what we're going to talk about for the remaining five weeks of the series. This is going to be a six-week series that's actually going to carry us into Advent. I'm really excited for our Christmas series that we're already working on that we've got coming up. So this is going to carry us all the way through to Thanksgiving. One of the things in the video that I wanted to point out that I thought could help us approach the overarching point of the book of James is that idea of perfection and living lives as our whole selves versus living lives, they called it in the video, as our compromised selves. I think that this is something that we can all relate to. In chapter one, they said that through the book of James that this word perfect or whole appears seven times and that James is writing to push us in that direction. And I think that we can relate to a need to be made whole in that way because many of us know what it is to live disjointed lives, right? I feel like if you're a believer for any amount of time, you know what it is to live a life that doesn't feel all the way in sync. You see a version of yourself that you know that God created you to be. I know that I can walk in that obedience. I see who he wants me to be, and yet I continue to walk in this direction and be this person that I don't want to be, but I keep getting pulled in that direction. We know what it is to come to church on a Sunday, maybe have a good experience, be moved by the worship, which I was this morning, that was great. Be moved by the worship. Be moved by the sermon. Feel a closeness to Jesus. Feel like it was a sweet moment. And then Monday morning you wake up and you go crack skulls at work. Monday morning you wake up and you forget that yesterday was a sweet moment. Maybe it doesn't even make it to the next day. Maybe you had a sweet moment and then in the car the wife says the thing that you don't want her to say and then you're off to the races, right? And there goes that peace and harmony. You know what it is to wake up in the morning, to have a quiet time, to devote some time to God, to spend time in God's Word, to spend time in prayer, and on that very same day lose your mind with your co-workers or your kids or your spouse. We know what it is to have a habit or a hang-up that we say, I'm done with this. I'm not doing this anymore. This has owned my life and has displeased God and displeased me for too long. I'm drawing a line in the sand. I'm not doing this anymore. And then maybe we added in some controls and some accountability and we asked people to help us out. And we took this stand. I'm going to live as that person finally. And then a day or a week or a month later, we do the same thing. And we live as the version of ourselves that we don't like, that Jesus died to save us from. But for some reason, we continue to go back there. I think we all relate to what I find to be one of the most encouraging passages in Scripture in Romans chapter 7 when Paul writes, he says, the things that I want to do, I do not do. The things that I do not want to do, I do. So he's talking about this tension. I see the things that I want to do. I see the person who I want to become. I want to do those things, but for some reason I can't walk in that life totally. And then I see this person that I don't want to be. I don't want to make these choices, but I can't stop myself from making those choices. The things that I want to do, I do not do. The things that I do not want to do, I do. And then he finishes off at the end of chapter seven with this great verse. He says in declaration, oh, wretched man that I am, who will deliver me from this body of death? I've taken the time a couple of times in my life to read all the way through the book of Romans from start to finish, it's great for plane rides, I always stop at that verse and just kind of go, thank you God for Paul and for his experience of this too. Oh wretched man that I am who will deliver me from this body of death? Because we know what it is to feel out of sync. The Bible calls it our new self and our old self. That our old self was crucified with Christ and it no longer lives and now Jesus lives in me and we're free to walk in this new self but there is this part of the world that continues to drag us down and make us less than whole. And it's this that James writes to address. He writes to the church, and I believe that the reason that James writes the letter is to help us pursue wholeness. James is written to help us pursue wholeness. That wholeness that is walking in the person that God created us to be, walking in the person that Jesus made it possible to be in the first place through his death, walking as that person, walking in that wholeness. He wants us to no longer live these disjointed, out of sync, incomplete lives. I think we'll see that's why he wrote the whole book. His goal is, some people call it maturity, others call it wholeness. He calls it perfection or completion. His goal is to help us get there. We understand that the only way there is through Christ, but we also understand that in this earth, on this side of eternity, that God asks us to obey. He asks us to walk and to follow. And in doing that, we will grow into mature versions of ourselves and to who God wants us to be. And so James writes to help us pursue that wholeness. And I think that's true because of this passage, chapter 1. If you have a Bible, you can open it. If you have one at home, open one there, and you should have the scriptures in your notes. But I'd love for you guys to be interacting with the Bible and with the chapter and see how it all ties together. But if someone were to ask me, point me to the synopsis verses on why James is even written. What is James trying to do? I would take you here. This is where I think he's trying to help us pursue wholeness. Chapter 1, verses 22 through 25 why James writes the book. Because he wants us to be doers who act. He wants us to persevere. He says we shouldn't be like, again, it's this imagery of two versions of ourselves. Don't be the person that looks at the law of God. He calls it the perfect law of liberty, which I love that phrase because God's word was not given to us to constrain us, but to offer us liberty. And that perfect liberty, that perfect law of liberty is Christ. He is the word of God. And he rewrote the law of the Old Testament to say, go and love others as I have loved you. Love God and love others. That's how Jesus rewrites and summarizes the law correctly. And he says that there's one version of us that we stare at the law, we see what it says, we hear it, we pay attention to sermons, maybe we listen to podcasts, we talk with friends about spiritual things, we have our ears open. We hear the word, but then we go and we don't do it. We live lives as those disjointed versions of ourselves. He says, when you do that, you're like somebody who looks at your face in the mirror and then walks away and you forget what you look like. He said, but if you'll gaze into the perfect law of liberty and persevere in doing it, then you will be blessed in your doing. And so I think the answer to our question, James says first, we say first that James writes to help us pursue holiness. So the question becomes, okay, James, how do I pursue holiness? Well, he tells us in these verses, we pursue wholeness by persevering in doing. We pursue wholeness, that complete version of ourselves, by persevering in doing. So that, I think, as a summary statement, begs two questions. Why does James feel it necessary to highlight persevering? Why does he put that out front? Why does he open up the book with it? It's the very first thing, once he starts writing. He says, hey guys, how you doing? And then he starts talking about how pain is going to happen. Why is it that James says right away, if you want to live as a whole self and you need to persevere, because he's communicating this idea of you're going to want to quit. It's going to be really hard. It's kind of a terrible selling point for James. So why does he start there? And then what does doing look like? What are we supposed to be doing? So as we answer those questions, the first question, why persevering? Well, we persevere because life requires it. We persevere because life requires it. James is aware of this reality. Like I said, it's how he starts his letter. Literally, verse 1, James, the servant of God and the Lord Jesus Christ to the 12 tribes and the dispersion. Greetings, which means the Hebrew people who have dispersed outside of Israel. You also refer to it as a diaspora. Then, verse 2, count it all joy, my brothers, when you meet trials of various kinds. He says, hey, how you doing? Haven't seen you in a while. Listen, life's going to stink like a lot, and when it does, just count it joy. Like, that's a terrible opener. James, why are you doing that? But he says, count it all joy, my brothers, when you meet trials of various kinds, for you know the testing of your faith produces steadfastness perseverance instead of steadfastness. But he says, And plenty of people have pointed this out before, but just in case you missed it those times, he doesn't say, if you have trials. He doesn't say, hey, if life gets hard sometimes, not saying it well, but if it does, then hang in there. He says, no, no, when? When you face trials, plural, of all kinds, count them as joy. Why? Because they're going to bear out a perseverance and a steadfastness that's going to make us perfect and complete, not lacking anything. It's this idea of being a whole person again. So a couple things from that idea and why James introduces it as a theme that shows up throughout the book. We find it again in chapter 5 when he's talking about having patience and doing good. James knows that your faith is going to be challenged. He knows that perseverance is going to be required. He knows that there are going to be couples who struggle mightily with infertility, and all they want is to experience the joy of having their own child. He knows that. And he knows that when that happens, it's going to test their faith, and it's going to make them wonder if God is really good. James knows that we lose people too early. He knew that parents would mourn the loss of children. He knows that. And because he knows that, he knows that it's going to be really easy for those parents in that moment to cry out and say, God, that's not fair. Why'd you let that happen? And that those circumstances would conspire to shipwreck your faith. And so he says, hang in there. Have faith when it's hard. He knows that marriages will end and that diagnoses will come and that abuse will happen and that abandonment is a thing and that loneliness and depression are things that we walk through. He knows that we are going to lose loved ones before we want to. James knows that and he knows that when those things happen, we're going to want to walk away from our faith because it's going to seem like God isn't looking out for us anymore. And he's telling you when that happens and it seems like things are broken, hang on, persevere, continue in faith, Continue to obey. And when you do, it will make you perfect and complete, not lacking anything. This is the real reason for perseverance. Those of you whose faith has seen that test, those of you who have walked through a season in your life where something happened that was so hard that it made you doubt if God was really looking out for you, it made you doubt if God really cared about you, it made you question your faith, if you came out of that clinging on to your faith, you know it is all the stronger. I was actually talking with someone this last week about this idea, and we just kind of noted, I noted, I don't really trust someone's faith very much until it's been through tragedy. Until it's been hardened in that kiln, I just don't trust it yet. There is something to the people who have walked through tragedy and yet have this faith that they cling to that makes it unshakable. Isn't there? I think of somebody who's going to be an elder in the new year, Brad Gwynn. To my recollection, Brad has lost his sister and his brother and his mom. He's, I don't know, in his 60s, maybe late 50s. Sorry, Brad, I don't know. He's been through tragedy. His faith has been through the tests. But if you talk to him about Jesus and about why he believes, it's humbling. It's admirable. I can honestly tell you, I don't know if I want faith that strong because I don't want to walk through what he has to walk through to have it. But I want faith that strong. James knows, if you cling to your faith through trial, if you cling to Jesus and continue to obey him even when it's hard, that it will produce this completion in us. It will produce this firm, unshakable faith that cannot be shaken, that cannot be torn down. So he opens with, hey, hang in there. Because when you do, you're going to be stronger for it. So if we're supposed to hang in there, if we're supposed to continue to obey, even when it's hard, what is it that we're supposed to do? What does doing look like, right? What does God want from us? What does he expect from us? James is setting something up for the rest of the book to go through, like, here's some simple ways to obey. If you really want to please God, then here's a simple way to do it. If you really want to walk as that person, then these are the things that you need to be doing. These are the things that you need to be paying attention to. The question becomes, what does it look like to do? And I think he answers this question by saying, doing looks like helping the needy and pursuing holiness. Doing, obeying God, walking as a whole person, looks like helping the needy and pursuing holiness. Here's why I think this. Look at verse 27. Religion that is pure and undefiled before God the Father is this, to visit orphans and widows in their affliction and to keep oneself unstained from the world. Religion that is pure and undefiled before God. You want to do what God wants you to do? You want to live out your faith? You want to live as a whole person? Then here's what you need to do. Care for the widows and the orphan and their affliction and keep yourself unstained from the world. Help the needy and pursue holiness. That's a synopsis for everything that comes in the rest of the book. Everything that comes in the rest of the book is telling you, here's the heart conditions you need to help the needy. Here's why you should do that. Here's why it's near to God's heart. Everything that happens in the rest of the book is, here's what you do. If you want to pursue holiness, then here's how you do it. And this is a theme throughout the Bible. In Isaiah chapter one, we see the very same thing. He distills, Isaiah distills it all down. God says, you want to make me happy? Care for the widows and the orphans. Pursue me. That's what you need to do. Micah says that we should seek justice, love mercy, and to walk humbly with God. It's all through Scripture. So if we want to persevere in doing, what does doing look like? Doing looks like helping the needy and pursuing holiness. And when I say helping the needy, I really do mean that because in that culture, you've heard me teach this before, but for those who may have missed it or have joined recently, when we see widows and orphans in the Bible, what we need to understand is that in that culture, that was the least of these. Widows were typically older women who had no way to make any money. So if their husband had passed away and now they're living as single women and they don't have families to care for them, there is very little they can do besides beg for sustenance every day. They are the most exposed and endangered and vulnerable in that culture. Likewise, orphans are the most exposed and vulnerable in that culture. There's no welfare. There's no orphanages. There's no Social security, there's no public medicine, there's none of that. They're just on their own. And God says, my people should have a heart to care for those who can't care for themselves. My people should have a heart to care for those in the greatest need. That's why at Grace we partner with Faith Ministry down in Mexico that builds homes for people who can't afford their own homes because they work in a Panasonic factory for less than a dollar a day. So we send money down there and build them homes and go down there in teams every year to love the least of these, to care for those who can't care for themselves. We heard earlier Mikey talk about Addis Jamari, who literally cares for orphans in Ethiopia. As girls age out of the orphanages and have no life skills and nothing to do with themselves, they take them into a home, teach them skills, send them back to school, and give them a path forward. And now they work with families on the front end of it so that when they have new babies and they don't know what to do and they're too poor to afford these babies, they give them materials and they give them training and they give them money so that they don't have to turn those kids into orphans but they can grow up in good solid homes. That's why we partner with them. That's why so many people at our church are all into a seat at the table downtown where it's a pay what you can restaurant so that you can go and have your meal and leave a token behind so that someone else can have a meal too if they can't afford it. Caring for the needy is near and dear to God's heart. And I would say to you this, if you're a believer and a part of your regular behavior and pattern isn't to care for those in need, then I don't think you're doing all that God has for you to do. I don't think it's possible to say, I'm walking in lockstep with Jesus. I'm being exactly who he created to me. I love him with my whole heart. I spend my days with him. I commune with God in prayer and yet still not help the needy. It's one of the first things that shows up in every teaching in scripture that if you love God, you'll help those who can't help themselves. Not only should we be about this as a church, we need to be about this as individuals. If you call yourself a Christian, if you claim God as your Father and Jesus as your Savior and that's not a part of your pattern, I would encourage you to find a way to make that a part of your pattern. There's a part of God that we find in doing that work. It's who His children are designed to be. And then He tells us that we should pursue holiness. Keep yourself unstained from this world. The word holy simply means different or other. In Scripture we're told to be holy as God is holy. And it's this command, it's this acknowledgement. Listen, you're different. You're different than the world. You're not better than the world. We're cut from the same cloth. You know Jesus, and the world doesn't yet know Jesus. That's the difference. You're not better than anybody, but you're different than them. And we're called to be different than the world. We're called to laugh at different jokes. We're called to post different political memes, if any at all, ever. We're called to argue differently in the public square. We're called to behave differently than them. We're called to love differently than the world. We're called to watch different things than what they watch. We're called to different standards than what they're called to. Personal holiness matters a lot. And James says, if you want to be a whole person, then persevere in doing. And what does doing look like? It looks like helping the needy and pursuing holiness. Now listen, we're holy because Jesus has made us holy. We're already there because Jesus has died for us and we are clothed in his righteousness. However, in this life, the Bible reminds us over and over again that we are to obey. And obeying takes our effort. So as far as it depends on us, we help the needy and we pursue holiness. And the rest of the book is about really unpacking that idea. What are the heart conditions that exist around helping those who can't help themselves? And what does it look like to live holy and unstained in this world? So I hope that that will serve as a good primer to get you ready for the rest of the book of James. Next week we come back with probably the easiest thing to do. It's why we're starting off with it, taming the tongue. And then we're going to move on to the rest of the book. I'm really looking forward to going through this book with you guys. I'm going to pray for us and then we will be dismissed. Father, you're good to us. My goodness. You're good to us and we're not good to you. You remain faithful to us when we are faithless. God, you watch us live our disjointed lives. And you're patient with us, and you're gentle, and you're loving. Father, I pray that as we go through this series, that everybody who hears it or preaches it, God would just have their heart enlivened to this idea of walking wholly with you. Of walking in lockstep with Jesus. Give us visions of actually being the people that you created us to be, of leaving behind our disjointed selves. Give us the honesty to identify where we're not obedient, and give us the courage to walk in the obedience that you show us. It's in your Son's name we pray these things. Amen.

Good morning, Grace. This has been quite the two weeks. We're supposed to, this morning, be in the middle of a series in the book of Acts called Still the Church. But in light of everything that's happened in our country, the elders and I universally and quickly agreed that we could not just continue on in the book of Acts like nothing was going on outside these walls. And as I've watched the protests and the demonstrations and the rioting and the looting and all the back and forth and been consumed in the news and social media and everything happening and all the voices being heard and all the things being said, I just became deeply convicted that we needed to stop and talk about this as a church. I became deeply convicted that I needed to prayerfully consider and address this as your pastor. And so I've talked a lot this week. Called people, I've sat in people's homes, I've met people, I've watched interviews, I've listened to discussions, I've read books, I've consumed podcasts, I wake up thinking about this issue of racial inequality and tension and injustice in our country. I go to sleep thinking about it. I scour the internet. It has consumed me, like many of you, for these past few weeks. And all of it, I think, has pressed on the church, has pressed us into this one singular question of what do we do now? What do we do? In light of everything we've seen, in light of what we're witnessing, in light of these demonstrations that feel different. We've seen protests before. We've seen rioting and looting even before, but these feel different. And I think it impresses upon the church the necessity to answer this question, what do we do now? What do we do as individuals? What do we do as a church? And for Grace, pointedly, what do we do as a predominantly white church in the face of the reality of the last two weeks? So as I've thought about how to answer that question, I thought it would probably be most helpful to start in this place of agreement. Every reasonable person that I know agrees that George Floyd was murdered by that police officer. I don't know any reasonable person, I haven't even actually talked with anybody, who would argue that what happened to George Floyd was justified and deserved, that what happened to him was anything short of murder. I don't know anybody arguing that. Conversely, I don't know anybody arguing for the morality and the rightness and the justification of protests that devolve into looting and rioting. I've not heard anyone make a good nuanced argument that people of color deserve the right to just charge into stores and white people deserve the right to just charge into stores and loot and take what they want and get violent. I've not heard anybody arguing from the morality of protests that devolve into looting and rioting. No one's supporting those. No one's saying that they're okay, and no one's excusing them away. So I don't think that it's worth our time this morning to further condemn the officer that murdered George Floyd or to decry the morality of looting and rioting. We all agree on those things. I think the more interesting question that we need to be asking, that I want to be asking as a member of the white community, is what is the message coming out of the protests and the demonstration? What is it that the black community would have us hear as a result of these protests? What are they using their voice to say? And if we listen closely, what should we be hearing? I've actually started thinking of the demonstrations and even the looting and the rioting in this light, kind of like this. Many of you are married. And if you're married, you know what it is to have a little spat with your spouse. You know what it is to have a little mundane day-to-day disagreement. And if you're not married, think about your relationship with a parent or with a sibling or with a close friend or with a child. We've all been in these discussions where there's a little disagreement, there's a little spat, there's kind of a flare-up, but then all of the sudden our spouse goes maximum angry. Whatever maximum angry looks like for your spouse, whether that's just like quiet, cutting comments, whether it's just getting silent and retreating, if it's throwing things, if it's yelling, whatever it is, we've been in these situations where all of the sudden at the drop of a hat, for reasons we don't all the way understand, our spouse is maximum angry with us. And we know that their reaction, that what happened that day in that instance does not warrant their reaction. If we are an unwise spouse, if we're bad at this, we will react to that overreaction. We'll point at him or we'll point at her, and we'll say, I don't deserve that. You shouldn't be saying that. What happened doesn't warrant your reaction. This isn't fair. You shouldn't do that. And we'll condemn the overreaction. And we'll heighten the argument. But what wise spouses do, what wise people do, is acknowledge. Yeah, that's an overreaction. But clearly, that's not a reaction just to what's happening in this moment. Clearly, there are things that have been simmering under the surface. There is a series of frustrations and disappointments that have led to this moment, that have caused this person to boil and bubble over in this way. So rather than reacting to the overreaction, let me be interested and listen and see what I can learn about the series of events that have built up in this person's heart to lead them to this place. Wise people want to understand what led to this response in the first place. And I think the best thing that I can do, the best thing that we can do in the face of these protests and demonstrations is to ask the question, wait, wait, wait, what is it that led to this moment? What are all the simmering frustrations and disappointments that you've experienced, that the black community has experienced that have led to this moment of demonstrations for the past two weeks? The most important question we can be asking, I think, is what is it the black community is trying to say? What are they trying to communicate? And as I think through that question, my belief is that the loudest message coming out of these protests is simply, will you listen to us now? Will you hear us now? Will you give us a voice now? I think what the black community is telling us is that, hey, racial injustice still exists. Racial inequality still exists. Racial oppression is still a very real thing in the United States of America, and we bear the brunt of it every day. It is still a thing that is happening. And I would be the first to tell you, I would be the first to argue that this country has made tremendous strides in racial equality and justice since 1968. We have come an incredibly far way in just a generation. But what these protests tell us is that we still have strides to make. We still have a ways to go. We're still not there yet. The black community is telling us we still experience injustice and oppression. And if you are a child of God, if you would call God your Father and Jesus your Savior, if you would call yourself a Christian, then when there is a group of people in your community that is telling you, hey, we feel like we exist in injustice, we feel like we are being treated unfairly, we feel like we are oppressed, that ought to perk up your ears. When there is a community of people saying, raising their hand and saying, hey, we feel oppressed. We feel like there's systemic injustice in our country. That perks up the ears of God. That breaks the very heart of God. And it ought to break our heart too, particularly as God's children, particularly as God's church. When there's a group of people in our community crying out that they feel oppressed, that life feels unfair, that it is unjust, as God's children, we ought to perk up our ears and listen intently and wonder at why and allow our hearts to be broken at that reality because that reality breaks the heart of God. Justice and correcting oppression are very near to the heart of God. I know this is true because the Bible says it over and over again. I know this is true because of passages like Isaiah chapter 1. Isaiah chapter 1, verses 10 through 18. If you have a Bible, you can turn there. That's one of my favorite passages in the whole Bible. I know I say that about a lot of passages. I really mean it for this one. I love Isaiah chapter one, 10 through 18. Those eight verses, those are the gospel. It's a beautiful passage. But I've never thought of it in the light that I'm about to explain it in until this week. If you look at that passage in verses 10 through 15, God is blasting Israel. Israel, those are his children, those are his people. They would have considered themselves the church or saved back in that time. And God is blasting them for going through the motions of their faith without really living it out. And he's saying things to them like, your solemn assemblies, listen to this, my soul hates. He says, when you pray to me, I will turn my back to this. I'm not there. I'm not listening. When you perform your sacrifices, I don't care about them. I don't want them. All the religious duties that you're doing, I'm not interested in those. And then in verse 16, after he blasts them, after he says, quit going through the motions, I'm not interested. In verse 16, it's almost as if he's saying, you want to know what I'm interested in? You want to know what's important to me? You want to know how I want my people to be defined? If you want to do the right thing, do you know what you need to do? This is what he says, verse 16. After blasting them, he ends 15 with the phrase, your hands are full of blood. 16, he says this, wash yourselves, make yourselves clean, remove the evil of your deeds from before my eyes, cease to do evil, learn to do good. So he says, listen, repent of all the things that I've just accused you of. Admit that you've been going to the motion. Stop doing that. Admit that you're living out this heartless faith and seek to do right. And if you want to do right, here's what you need to do. Learn to do good. Seek justice. Correct oppression. Bring justice to the fatherless. Plead the widow's cause. God says, you want to know what's near and dear to my heart? You want to know how I want my people to be known and what I want them to be marked for and what I want to be important to them? You want to please me? You want to make me happy? You want to know what God wants from me? Seek justice. Correct oppression. There's a community of people in our nation crying out that they are experiencing injustice and oppression and God's people should listen to that brokenheartedly and want to help. It's not just in Isaiah. In Micah, chapter 6, verse 8, a famous passage. Micah similarly ends a long diatribe of the ways that God's children have failed, And he says, if you want to do good, here's what we need to do. He says, he has shown you, oh man, what is good and what the Lord requires of you, but to seek justice and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God. Three things God wants from his people. Just distill it all down to whatever God would request. And what he leads with is seek justice. In the Psalms, we are told that we need to be a voice for the voiceless. It's the idea that when our voice is the loudest in the room, we ought to use it to help those with the weakest voice. Justice and the correction of oppression is near and dear to the heart of God. That's why I am firmly convinced that what is happening in our country right now is not a political issue. It's not political at all. And honestly, if you think it's political, you don't understand it. It's not political. It's a right and wrong issue. It's a gospel issue. Caring about this isn't about activism. It's about caring deeply about a manifestation of the gospel and the culture in which we live. What's happening breaks God's heart and it ought to break ours. It is our job as his people to diligently and fervently and generously correct oppression and to seek justice. This is a church issue. This is a gospel issue. This is a morality issue. So we have to talk about it. And even as I say that, even as I say that, there are those who I know and love who are good Bible-believing people, good moral folks, who would simply say, Nate, man, I agree with you that we need to care deeply about justice, and we need to care deeply about people not being oppressed. But I got to tell you, I just don't think that there is systemic oppression happening in our country. I just don't think that there is systemic injustice and racial inequality occurring in our country. I've heard statements like that even this week, and they're not statements from people who are racist or who mean ill will. They're just earnest, honest observations and thoughts from folks. But I would tell you if that's something that you might think, that first of all, that's something that I've thought too. But when you repeat that to black people, as I have this week, they went. I sat in someone's home and I said, hey, you know, there's some folks who would say that they just no longer see systemic oppression or injustice in our society. What would you say to them? They winced at me. It hurt them. And it wasn't a wincing of anger. They weren't mad. They didn't want to correct. It was a wincing of surprise and of disappointment and of hurt. That some people right around them don't even see what to them is so very evident. And if we don't believe that oppression is a thing, there's plenty of stories, there's plenty of examples of it continuing to happen in our country even to this day. As I spoke with people and listened and watched, I saw a lot of conversations happening between white people and black people. I was involved in some of those conversations. And in every one of those conversations, whether I'm watching them or involved in them or listening to them, the question would always come up, how have you experienced racism in your life? What are some instances where you've encountered, the white person's asking the black person, what are some instances where you've encountered racism in your life? And all of the black people had answers. They all responded with stories, sometimes multiple stories. Do you realize the power of that reality? Do you realize how condemning that truth is? That every black person you could go up to and find, even on the street, and just grab them and say, hey, I'm curious, how have you experienced racism in your life? When have you encountered racism in your day-to-day life? In the years that you've lived, what are the stories about your encounters of racism? Do you realize that they all have answers? You realize they can answer that question? That not a single one of them went, gosh, you know, I don't know that I have. You know how different that is from the white experience? I've never experienced a racial moment in my life. I've never been the victim of racism. I've never even asked my white friends, hey, when have you experienced racism in your life? Because we don't. Far and away, the vast majority of us don't even experience it. Do you realize the chasm and experiences there when they all have answers for it and we don't have any? One man shared his story, successful black businessman, went to a good college in the South, got involved in corporate America. He shared that in his office place, he often felt discriminated against. He shared some of that was probably imagined and some of it was probably very real. But what he knew is that the last thing in the world he could do is bring it up. The last thing in the world he could do is be honest about it or complain about it because you don't want to play that card and get that label. So he just kept his mouth shut. And after years of keeping his mouth shut, he gets promoted to their office in Manhattan. He moves his family up there. They find a great suburb in Connecticut where they decide to buy a home. They're walking through their neighborhood on the very first day that they're moving in. He's got his wife and his daughter in the stroller, and a car rides by them, and a white guy leans out the window and calls him the N-word and tells him that he's not welcome in his neighborhood and he needs to go home. In progressive Connecticut, a few years ago. It's still happening. I talked to somebody on the phone this week that confirmed an article that my wife, Jen, had read this week. She read an article. It wasn't an article. It was a post on Facebook that kind of went viral by a black man who just said, hey, listen, just so y'all know my experience, he loves to go on walks every day in his neighborhood. Kind of refreshes him like a lot of us like to go on walks. But he said, I'm very aware of the fact that I can't go on a walk without my wife or my daughter with me. I can't just walk through a neighborhood as a lone black man because I've gotten the cops called on me too many times because I'm seen as a threat in his own neighborhood. That story was confirmed this week when I was talking to somebody on the phone who said that they just bought a new house and they're about to move into this neighborhood. And he shared with me that his wife sat him down and said, honey, I know that you like to go on walks, but before you do that, for the first month or two that we live in this neighborhood, me and you and our kids need to go on a walk every day so that the neighbors can get used to seeing your face so that when you are out there by yourself, they don't think you're a threat and they don't call the police on you. I just moved into Falls River in April. I go on walks all the time. Never a single time, not once have I thought, gosh, I hope my neighbors don't see me as a threat. I hope they don't see my whiteness as a threat and call the police on me and I have to explain myself to them. I haven't once even considered that. It blew my mind that they still have to care about that. I was talking to another person who is very successful, who has degrees from colleges that I can't even imagine going to. He has brothers and they're all successful. And I asked him, growing up in a black home, clearly you would point to your parents as the reason for your success and your brother's success. But what was it about the way that they parented you that made you successful? And he told me that his parents always told them that they have to hold themselves to a higher standard than anybody else around them, that they have a smaller margin for error in their life than anybody else around them, that they're going to have to work harder than the other people around them if they want to achieve the same things. And they were incredibly hard on their boys for their sake because they knew that the margin for error for their children was slimmer than the margin of error of a house full of people who look like me. Then I started hearing about the conversations that black parents have to have with their children when they start to drive. They have to tell them that they're black and what their blackness means and how they should be sensitive to carry themselves. They have to walk them through protocols. If you get pulled over, do these things. Do not do these things. And they have to do this for the safety of their children. When I got my keys, my dad just handed me the keys. And he said, don't speed. And if you do speed and you get pulled over, just say yes, sir, to the officer. Be nice to him. That was it. There was no conversations about my whiteness. There was no, I've never thought to have a conversation with Lily, my daughter, about her whiteness. It's different, you guys. It's two different Americas. It's two different experiences. This points to an injustice and an oppression that still exists. This points to the reality that Martin Luther King's dream has not yet been realized. And if we want to see it come to fruition, that even though we've made great strides, we still have more to take. If the stories aren't enough, if those are anecdotal, I could point to evidence. I could point to statistics. I could point to how poverty skews greater in the African-American community. I could point to schools and how they lower in quality in African-American communities. I could point to a loss of the father figure in black homes. I could point to joblessness in the black community that's greater than that in the white community. Statistic after statistic that would lend itself to this understanding that the playing field is not level in our country. And yet even as I say that, even as I share those stories and those statistics that we all know, there are those of us who would say, yeah, but there's other factors, Nate. This is not easy. This is nuanced. There's other things going on there. There are those of us who would look at those statistics or look at those anecdotes and point to systemic issues within the black community and say, they need to get those taken care of too. They have some things that maybe they need to think about a little bit differently that they should correct as well. And I would tell you honestly, that I agree with you. This is not a one-sided issue. No conflict, no disagreement, no misunderstanding, no matter how great, is 100% one side's fault and 0% another side's fault. We all have things that we can own within the discussion. But even though I would agree that both the white community and the black community have a ways to go to achieve racial equality. I've begun to think of it like this. You know, when I was growing up, if there was somebody at school mistreating me, somebody in my life doing something that wasn't fair, treating me in a way that I didn't deserve. If I were to complain to my dad, hey, so-and-so's treating me like this, it's not fair, I don't like it, I don't appreciate it, he would say to me, son, when they act that way towards you, I want you to be gracious. I want you to be kind. I want you to forgive them. I do not want you to respond to them on the level that they are acting towards you. And I would get upset and I would say, but dad, that's not fair. They're doing this and they're doing that and they treat me in this way and I want to get back at them and I want to do this. And my dad would say, son, you're a rector and I'm not worried about them. They're not my children. You're my son. And this is how rectors act. I'm not worried about that house. I'm worried about my house. I'm not in control of that house. I'm not a voice in that house. I don't have authority in that house. I have authority in this house. And so I'm gonna worry about my house. And as long as you're a part of my house, then this is how you're going to behave. So in the issue of racial inequality and injustice, I've adopted the posture that I'm not going to think about that house. I'm not going to think about what other people need to do. Frankly, candidly, I'm not gonna think about what the black community needs to do. I'm gonna think about my house. I'm gonna think about my responsibilities. What are the mindsets and mistakes that I've made over my 39 years that I need to repent of and correct? What do I need to do? I'm not going to worry about that house. I'm going to worry about my house. Other voices will speak up in that house. They're responsible for that. That's not my responsibility. I'm worried about me. I'm worried about grace. And grace is a predominantly white church, so I'm worried about our house. What do we do? And it's because of that mindset and just focusing on myself and what I should do that I've come to really think about my role, however small it is, in racial reconciliation to really parallel the story of the Good Samaritan. A month or two ago, we were going through a series called Storyteller, looking at the stories that Jesus told to make a moral point. And one of the stories that we covered, one of the parables was the parable of the Good Samaritan. So we know this story, right? There's a man, he's on the road to Jericho, he's going from Jerusalem to Jericho. He gets injured. A priest and a Levite that we would expect to know how to do the right thing see him injured, see him dying, and they just cross over him and continue on with their day. Then a Samaritan shows up, the one that you wouldn't understand to be the moral exemplar in this story. He shows up. He sees the injured man. He kneels down. He tends to his wounds. He picks him up. He puts him on his donkey. He takes him to a hotel. He swipes his credit card, and he tells the innkeeper, whatever this person needs, you charge it to my account. That's the story of the Good Samaritan. And the point of that story, Jesus tells us, is that we're supposed to love our neighbor like the Good Samaritan, loved the injured man. And I think the current situation relates to that parable in that the black community is depicted by the injured man on the road who is crying out and saying that they are hurting, that they are in pain, that they are experiencing injustice. And every time I've heard one of those stories in my life, the first one I remember was Rodney King in the 90s. And every time it bubbles up again and every time the black community cries out and says, hey, it's still not fair. Hey, Martin Luther King's dream is still not realized. Hey, pay attention to us, please. Listen, every time that happens and every time I see the suffering of the black community, I always take the role of the priest and the Levite. And I look at them and I see them hurting and I continue on with my way. Because I think, I'm so sorry that you're there. I'm so sorry that you're hurting. I hate that this has happened to you. But I didn't do it. It's not my fault you're there. I don't hate you. I'm not racist. I don't hate people who look like you. I would never do this to you. As a matter of fact, I hate the people who did that to you. But I didn't do it. Not my fault. I'm not going to feel bad about that. And I move on. And then sometimes in my moving on to justify walking past this suffering brother, I'll begin to wonder, what could that victim have done to have prevented getting robbed like that on the road to Jericho? How late was he out? Who could he have brought with him? When he started to get robbed, did he mouth off? Did he resist? How is he to blame for what's going on? And usually, if I'm being honest about myself, those questions are asked out of a motivation to quell my own guilt. And I should confess to you that I'm, this is not figurative for me that I've played the role of the priest and the Levite. I'm a very flawed messenger for this sermon. I'm not good at this. I don't have black friends. In fact, all the arguments that some of you may have made to refute the things that I'm saying, I can promise you I've made those to my friends. So please, in my words and in my voice, don't hear condemnation, hear confession. I've been the priest and the Levite, and I'm ashamed of it. And God calls me to be the Samaritan. The Samaritan, even though it wasn't his fault, knelt down and he bound up the wounds of this person who had previously hated him. We presume that the victim was a Jew. There is racial tension between the Samaritans and the Jews. And the Samaritan ears to be perked up with what I think perks up God's ears as he encourages us, admonishes us to seek justice and correct oppression. I want to be one of those agents. And I am acknowledging and admitting, not just to myself, but publicly, hopefully, so that some of us can make the same admission that I have been the priest and the Levite stepping over the black community because I felt like it didn't have anything to do with me. I felt like because I'm not racist, because I didn't do that, it's not my fault. It's not my problem. But now I'm convicted that God himself told me to love others as the Samaritan loves others. To be a neighbor to everyone. To care about everyone's suffering and hurting. And I have been moved in the last two weeks and my heart has been broken that I want to be a part of the striding forward. I want to be a part of the healing of the racial divide. I want to help my hurting brothers and sisters. And hopefully you do too. And some of you, to your everlasting credit, you've been way ahead of me on this. I hope there's room at the party for some more. If you want to help, if we want to do more, if we want to help heal the divide, what can we do? And that's really the million-dollar question. As I've had conversations with people this week, really, people to varying degrees will say, yeah, we agree with that sentiment. We agree with that. We're with you. We want to do something. What do we do? That's the big question. So as I've wrestled with that this week, I've come up with three things that I think we can all proactively do. For those of us who want to be a part of the healing, I think we can proactively do these things. The first one is that I think that we should diversify our life. Diversify our lives. Make some black friends. I was on a call with a pastor, Albert Williams, from Dothan, Alabama, this week. And we were talking about all of these things, and I was telling him all the things I wanted to share with my church, and he said, Brother Nate, let me ask you a question. And I so love his boldness in this question. He said, let me ask you a question. You ever have black folks over to your house for dinner? And I said, well, you know, Albert, we just moved into a new house in April and it's been in quarantine. So I really haven't had much of a chance. And he laughed. He said, come on, Nate, you know what I'm asking you? No, I haven't. I haven't. And he got on to me. He told me the truth. And he didn't use these words, but he basically said, man, you don't have a leg to stand on then. You don't have any right to preach this. You're not even doing it. How are you going to go tell your people what they need to do and you're not even doing it yourself? And he's right. I'm a flawed messenger. But I'm going to diversify my life. I'm reaching out to other black pastors, not to build bridges between churches, but to build friendships between men. And I want people of color to be regular visitors in our home. I want Lily to grow up around that. And honestly, I think that this could bring about maybe a more profound change than anything else to just diversify our lives, normalize it for our children, learn empathy as we hear their stories and what they're walking through. And if I'm just being candid with you, at the risk of offending some people, there are very few people that I know who think that oppression doesn't exist who also have black friends. It just changes your viewpoint. So I think we need to diversify our lives. The second thing I would encourage us to do is to adopt a posture of listening. Adopt a posture of listening. I was talking to another person this week who agreed with me on everything and said, yeah, there needs to be a discussion. We need to talk. There needs to be some back and forth. But both sides of the party, both the white community and the black community, have some baggage to own. And there needs to be some give and take at this table. One side can't just take all the blame. And I said, yeah, you're right, but why don't we just listen for a minute? Why don't we just give? How about instead of yeah, but, instead of arguing with the statistics, instead of finding nuanced ways for that to not all the way be true, how about instead of searching for the one exception or the one article that makes us feel right about ourselves, how about we just listen to the voices and the messages coming out of the black community? We don't say anything. We don't argue. And some of the things, I'll be honest, some of the things I've seen coming out this week have just been completely illogical and nonsensical. But we don't have to respond to those. Just sweep those aside. Let's listen for the deeper messages. Let's be receptive to what our black brothers and sisters are saying. And then the third thing I would encourage us all to do is to develop a muscle for empathy. Develop that empathy muscle that you have in your heart. Learn what it's like to be a black person in the United States. Read some books. I thought about having books to recommend to you, but the truth of that is that we have all had books recommended to us. It's not hard to find them. Read a book that opens your eyes. Listen to a podcast. Seek out interviews. Listen to the voices. Seek to be empathetic and to understand. And even as I say those things, what can we do? We can do those three things. Even as I say those, there may be some of you that hear that and think, come on, Nate, like those are wispy, kind of mamby-pamby, like what real things can we do? Those feel insufficient to me. I would say to you that, respectfully, if you're doing all three of those things, if your life is diverse, if you're listening to the voices coming out of the black community, if you're developing that muscle of empathy intentionally in your life, and you still find those three steps to be inadequate, then please please let's talk and find some more adequate steps. But honestly, if you're not doing all three of those or none of those at all right now, how about we just do those and then talk about if they're empty? How about we just take those steps and then assess if they're insufficient and inadequate? Let's do the work first and then find out if what we're doing is working. I would finish by saying this. There are those of you, I believe, who will hear this sermon this morning and get fired up. You'll be excited, feel refreshed. You'll wanna be a part of the solution. You'll be happy we talked about this. Let that fire burn in a sustainable way. In a few weeks, the energy of the protest will be done. COVID will be back in the news cycle and our culture will have moved on to something else. And if we allow our fervor and our conviction to pursue racial equality and justice to fade along with the cultures, then we're gonna be right back here again. So let's let the fire burn in a sustainable way. Let's stick with it and let's mean it and let's make meaningful, lasting changes in our lives. There are others of you who may be offended by different things that I've said or disappointed in the way that I've handled this. And I understand that, I really do. This is a difficult issue. It's a nuanced topic. It stirs up emotions that we don't even understand how they got there. And it's not right of me to experience a conviction and then expect everyone else to be okay with that conviction being impressed upon them. So I would simply ask you, if I've offended you or upset you, to have some grace and some patience with me. And I would invite any one of you in response to this message or what's been happening to email me and let's start a dialogue. My email is at the bottom of the screen. It's nate at graceralee.org. Reach out to me and let me know and let's continue this discussion. I think it can only be helpful. But I know that for me, I want to be the good Samaritan. For grace, I want us to be a part of the healing. I want us to take seriously what grieves the heart of God. Would you pray with me as we pray for our city and our community and our country and our role and what God would have us do to bring about a very necessary healing? Father, you continue to be good. We know that you love us. We know that you love minorities and majorities with equanimity. We know that your heart is that we would love one another. God, give us the strength and the desire and the vision and the grace to overcome these differences in our race that are beautiful differences. Give us the strength to embrace one another. Bring people who don't look like us into our lives that we might befriend and understand them. Help each of us do what we believe is our part to heal this divide. God, I pray that you would work on our hearts. I pray that you'd speak to us even now. I pray that we would be moved by what moves you. And God, I pray for an America that's the same for everyone. Somewhere there's a four and a half year old girl running around that is in a black family. She's the same age as my daughter. God, can they be adults in the same country? Can they raise their children in a place that is void of oppression and injustice? Would you help us be a part of that reality? In Jesus' name we ask these things. Amen.

It's good to get to be back with you in the saddle preaching live. I've been excited for this morning and I'm excited for this series. This series, Things You Should Know, I think that's what we're calling it. Yeah, it's right there on the screen next to me. Things You Should Know. I forgot what we named it back in the beginning of December, but I haven't forgotten what it's about. And it's based on this idea that there's things that we should all know as Christians, or that we at least nod along with as Christians, that we pretend that we know, that we may not actually know, right? Like there's a kind of a Christianese and another language that's spoken around churches. And I think sometimes we just kind of nod along with that because we don't want to look or feel dumb. And I know how it goes. I mean, you join a small group for the first time. You haven't really been involved in church in a while or just kind of cursory involvement. And then you show up in a small group and people start talking about stuff. And you might not know what they're talking about, but you don't want to feel dumb or silly or uninformed or make yourself look bad. So you don't say anything. And then you've been there so long that now I have to be one of the people that knows these things too. And so we just kind of nod along when people talk about grace and mercy or throw out Bible words like sanctification, and we just kind of act like we know what they're talking about when sometimes we really don't. And one of the things that I want you to know is that it's okay not to know stuff. It's actually really great to ask questions. One of my favorite things to do is to have my men's Bible study and have people in that study who are not very familiar with the text that we're covering because the questions that they ask are the best, but you have to be brave to ask questions because when you ask a question, you're admitting that I don't know this thing. And there's some stuff in the church that I think we nod along with, that we act like we know, when maybe we don't. And we want to be brave for you this month and ask those questions for you this month. And so this morning, the title of the sermon is simply the Bible. Questions that we might have about the Bible. I'm going to look at three questions that I think everybody has about Scripture that we might not know the answers to, but that I think every Christian should know. And now I'll warn you up front, this is not a normal sermon. This is far more informative. It's informational, this sermon is. The things that I'm going to share with you this morning are things that I wasn't exposed to until I was in Bible college, taking theology classes, or in grad school, in seminary, taking more theology classes. And there's a lot more to it than what we're going to cover this morning, but I wanted to take a morning, one Sunday, and address with you some common questions about the Bible, because again, I think every believer should know the answers to these questions. So I'll say up front, for some of you, you're going to love this. You're going to love it. Your notebook is out. You're ready. You're going to write these things down, and if you're a note taker, there's going to be a lot to write down. So get ready. Get your best possible pen. Some of you might not love this. This might not be your thing. And just to know, just for you to know, when I was praying before the sermon, my final words to God were, Father, make this helpful. And if it's not helpful, make it quick. Okay, so I'm with you. There's a lot of information, but I think you need to know this stuff, and I hope that you'll be interested in it. And actually, I want to know what you learned this morning. If I tell you something that you didn't know before, email me and tell me what you learned and tell me what you enjoyed. If there's other questions that you've always wanted to ask, email me and ask those questions. You can even tell me that I heard my friend ask this, so you don't even have to throw yourself under the bus. But get those questions to me. Get your responses to me. I want us to interact with the things we're talking about in this series. But I said I was going to give you three questions about the Bible that I think we should all be able to answer. And the first one is this. Why is the Bible a big deal? Why is the Bible such a big deal? Why do we make such a fuss about it? And it may seem like I'm going too simple on this, but I think it's an important question. Think about it. Think about where we place the Bible in our lives. I tell you guys all the time that there's no greater habit that anyone in their life could have than to read the Bible every day, than to spend time with God through prayer and in His Word every day. So we make a big deal out of the Bible. We hold the Bible up as the foremost authority in our lives. We believe and we teach at Grace that if you're walking with God, that you won't allow anything into your life until it's filtered through Scripture. That the biggest authority in your life of whether something is right or wrong or good or bad or from God or not is to go to Scripture and see what does it say. The entire church is built around the teachings of the Bible. Wars have been fought over it. People have died to preserve it. So it's worth asking the question, why is the Bible such a big deal? Well, the short answer is this. The Bible is a big deal because it's God's special revelation to us. We make such a fuss out of the Bible. The Bible is a big deal because it is God's special revelation to us. Now, here's what I mean. That word revelation, we're already getting into some technical Christian terms. That's not really a Christian term. That just means something that's revealed. It's the same root word there. It just means to reveal something. And so what we understand about ourselves and what you understand about you, whether you've ever thought about this or not, is that people can only know about you what you choose to reveal to them, right? If you meet somebody at a dinner party, you know you're never going to talk to them again. You can make up a totally false identity. They'll never know. You can tell them that you used to be a professional ball player. They won't know the difference. They'll Google you later. You won't exist, and it's fine. You'll never have that interaction again. But they only know about you what you choose to reveal about yourself. So when you meet someone in passing, it's just a cursory glance. They only know you by the way that you dress, by what you reveal, by how you present yourself to the world. The more someone is around you, the more they see you react and interact and respond, the more they learn about you and what's there. But again, people can only know about you what you choose to reveal to them about yourself, right? Well, the same is true of God. We can only know about God what he chooses to reveal about himself. And with him, it's in particular no more and no less. So with God, if we understand revelation to be what God chooses to reveal to us about himself, that we would get to know God the same way we would get to know anybody in our life, the same way other people would get to know us, then we have to understand that with God, there's two kinds of revelation. There's general revelation and special revelation. The way that I think about those is this. General revelation makes us aware of the presence of God, and special revelation gives us the details of that presence. General revelation is stuff that everybody can see. And Romans 1 actually sums up general revelation like this. This is what Paul says in Romans 1, looking at verse 19. He says, So he says, listen, God wrote himself in nature. Anybody who looks outward at nature, at the trees, at the seasons, at the rhythms of nature, the way the earth rotates around the sun, at how huge the universe is, at how small it can be, at the miracle of birth, at just the essence of life. As you look at nature, it points to a creator God. And as you look inward on what is written in your nature, it points to a creator God. Our moral compass, the fact that every civilization ever has prized bravery and bemoaned cowardice, has said that telling the truth is good and that being deceptive is bad. That moral code was written on our hearts by God. On our hearts, we have a longing for our Creator. So whether we look without or within, when we look at nature, God has written himself in nature. That is his general revelation, making all of us aware of his existence. But his special revelation, where he gives us the details of that existence, that's in the Bible. And here's what's incredible about that. What if we didn't have the Bible? What if we didn't know the details of this God that exists? Then he would just be to us this being that existed distant and cold, who had the authority to punish us, to start our life and to take our life, to manipulate circumstances to make us joyful or to make us miserable. It would be a God that we would hope to try to appease, but we wouldn't really know who he was. It would be a God that would inevitably incur fear and myth. But in God's goodness, he gave us the Bible. And it gives us the details of his existence. It's in his words that we find out, oh goodness, this God that created me loves me. This God that created me actually only created me so that I could spend eternity with him. That's how much he wants to be with me. This God who created me sent his son to die for me. This God who created me is love. He is goodness. He is gracious. He is merciful. This book tells us all we need to know about the God who created us. It is God's special revelation of himself to us. This is why we hold it in such high esteem. Because we believe that in these pages are the very words of God. And that this is, he could have chosen to reveal himself any way he wanted to, but what he chose to do is to reveal himself in the pages of Scripture. And in here we find him and who he is. It's an invitation to know our God better. That's why we make such a big deal out of the Bible. Now, the next question. And this one is important. I hope that some of you guys have asked this. I hope that some of you know some of the answers to this. But I think it's an important question. How did we even get the Bible? How did we get the Bible? How is it that I can go to the store and buy this, and these are the books that God wants in here, and these are the words that God wants in here, and these are the things that were written down however many years ago. How do we even get this? Because I don't know if you know this about the Bible, but the Bible is composed of an Old Testament and a New Testament. It totals 66 books. There's 39 in the Old Testament and 27 in the New Testament. And you may or may not know, I mean, you probably know that there's been a lot of people who have contributed to writing the Bible, but there's actually over 40 authors that contribute to the Bible. Did you know that the Bible was written over the span of about 1,400 years across three different continents, Africa and Asia and Europe? And that it was written actually in three different languages, Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic. And through all of that time, through the span of 1,400 years, through the minds of over 40 authors on three continents and however many different cultures that was, and in three different languages, God inspired this written word. So how did it get to us? It's a fair question. When we talk about how it got to us, we can really talk about it in the Old and the New Testament. The Old Testament is pretty easy. In ancient Israel, there was a ruling body called the Sanhedrin. That was a lot like our Senate. It was made up of different parties. The two most famous parties in the Sanhedrin were the Pharisees and the Sadducees. We've probably heard of those before, at least the Pharisees, I would think. And then there was other little parties that weren't as influential, but were there, the Essenes and the Zealots. You can think of those as like the modern day libertarians. I know that my friend Tom Sartorius will appreciate that very much. But the Sanhedrin was made up of different parties, and those parties ruled Israel. It was a religious rule, not too different from what we see in Muslim countries today. And the Sanhedrin got together somewhere around 250 BC, or maybe a little bit after, and one of the things that they affirmed was that the holy scriptures they had were the Holy Scriptures that would serve as the Old Testament. To them, it was 24 books that they called the Tanakh. To us, it's 39 books that we call the Old Testament, but they're the exact same. They grouped up a bunch of different books that we have separated out together, like Kings and Chronicles was one book, and now it's four. So they would group things together like that, but it's the same. Our 39 books are the same 24 books that they affirmed in 250 BC. And the Sanhedrin looked around and voted and they said, this is it. These are the Holy Scriptures. This is the Tanakh, the law and the prophets. In the New Testament, when we hear Jesus or one of the other writers refer to the law and the prophets, he's referring to the Old Testament, to the Tanakh. And that Old Testament has not been changed since 250 BC when they affirmed it. And the last book was Malachi, and it was written around 400 BC. So it had already existed as one big volume of works for at least 150 years before they ever addressed it. It hasn't changed since 400 BC, and it's not going to change in the future. The Old Testament is done, and that's how we got it. Now, the New Testament is interesting too, because at the time of Christ, there was a lot of writings. There's a lot of people writing a lot of different things. And after Christ left the scene, there was one universal church. We call it the Catholic Church. And the Catholic Church was structured. They say that there was a pope in the line of succession of Peter, that there was the next guy who was in charge of the church, and the next guy after that. And then there's bishops all that fan out depending on where the church is based on geography. And every now and again, they would have what was called councils. And all the leaders from all the different churches and parishes, I suppose, and all the different areas would get together in this one city and they would debate theological ideas. And they would decide, this is something that the whole church believes. This is something that we are going to cast aside. An example of this is the Council of Nicaea, where they decided without a doubt that Christ is God. Before that, there was some disagreement in the church. Some people thought that Christ was simply a man, that he was a prophet, like the Islam religion claims that he is. Other people say, no, he is deity. He is God incarnate in the flesh. So they got together, they talked about it, they voted on it, and they decided moving forward, the Christian church believes that Jesus is the Son of God. It's a really pivotal council, and we still affirm that. But what we find is that towards about 393 and 398, there was two councils, the Council of Hippo and the Council of Carthage, where those people got together and they voted on what books were going to be included in the New Testament. This is called the canonization of Scripture, the complete, done, codified work. And they voted on which books would be included. And what's important to point out here is it wasn't like they all brought 60 books to the table and then they slowly whittled it down to these 27. They voted on the 27 books that we commonly accept as Scripture that were commonly accepted then. All they did is agree on what was essentially already agreed upon. If you don't believe me, I actually have a quote this morning. I don't do this a lot, okay? I don't belabor things like this a lot because I think they're boring and no one cares. But I think this morning it's important. I've got a quote for you by a guy named F.F. Bruce. You know he's important because he doesn't use a name. It's just his initials. And in the church world, that means you're super smart and also pretentious. Get over yourself, F.F. But F.F. Bruce said this about the councils, and I think it's great. Read with me here. That's a big, long, fancy way of saying they didn't introduce any new ideas. All they did is put a rubber stamp on, yep, these are the books that we hold as Holy Scripture. And it's the same 27 books that we have today. They affirmed 27 books in the New Testament. We have those same 27 books now. So that's how we got the Old Testament and the New Testament. You may want to know, another question you should ask is, how did they determine which books were allowed in? What was the criteria? Well, for a book to be included in the canon, it had to be apostolic, harmonious, accepted, and inspired. Again, for a book to be included in the New Testament, it had to meet these requirements. It had to be apostolic, had to be harmonious, had to be commonly accepted, and it had to be inspired. And when I say apostolic, what I mean is this. An apostle is someone who has an eyewitness account of Christ. So for a book to be apostolic, it has to be written by someone who has seen Jesus in the flesh, which is a really easy way to say that the canon is closed. Can God appear to somebody and speak to someone and ask them to write something down on his behalf? Sure he could if he wanted to, but he doesn't do that anymore in a way that's going to be included in Scripture. We're not going to add to the Bible because one of the ways to get included in the New Testament is to be someone who's an eyewitness of Christ. And since all those people are dead, we're not accepting any more entries in the Bible. It has to be harmonious, meaning it has to agree with other books that are accepted in Scripture. It can't disagree with the Tanakh. It can't disagree with the teachings in the Old Testament. It can't disagree with the teachings and the quotes of Jesus. The Gospels were the first New Testament books written, so it can't disagree with any of those. It has to be in harmony with the rest of the books included. It's got to be accepted, meaning there's no surprises at these councils. Nobody brought this thing that was written down by somebody else and said, hey, would you consider this? The books that were agreed upon in Hippo and in Carthage were books that everybody was already familiar with, that those guys had taught their congregations out of many, many times. They were commonly accepted books. And then they had to be inspired. And really, the first three things are ways to determine if they felt like it was inspired by God. And this is an important word. We talk about the Bible being inspired. But I don't know how often we talk about what that means. Did God take over the minds of these men and these women and they wrote it down verbatim as the Holy Spirit spoke it to them? Was God basically dictating to them what the Bible was supposed to say? The way that we think about inspiration and how it works, and I hold this with a loose hand because it's hard to be certain how inspiration works. The only people who can explain it to us are people who never wrote the Bible. So it's just guesses. But the fancy word for it, if you're interested in such a thing, is verbal plenary inspiration. And basically what it means is the Holy Spirit guides your thoughts and your ideas and then your personality and your intellect takes over and expresses those things. So the Holy Spirit's gonna present an idea to Paul and he's gonna write it out and it's gonna look a lot different than when James writes something out or when David writes something out or when Solomon writes something out. It's almost like if you were to go to the field next to the church. Now, a lot of you haven't been here in so long that you've forgotten that there's a field over there, but there is. It'd be like going to that field and telling you to take a lap once in an SUV and once in a sports car. The journey is going to be the same. The lap's going to be the same, but the experience in that lap is going to be different based, and that lap is going to be different based on the car that you took. It's going to feel different in the SUV. It's going to get done in a different amount of time. It's going to feel different in the sports car. It's the same way with translation and or with inspiration. God speaks to one person, and the way that that person writes it down is going to be different than the way that this person writes it down. But the path and the impact and the point are the same. So in that way, God breathed Scripture into these authors by directing their thoughts and directing their hearts and their heads to the ideas that he wanted them to write down. So it's not unless a book is inspired, is harmonious, is accepted, and is apostolic do we include it in the New Testament. That's how we got our Bible. And the last question I want to address today is how do we know we can trust it? And this is an important question. How do we know that this book that I hold in my hands is the same book, that these 39 books are the exact same as they were when they got approved by the Sanhedrin in 250 BC? How do I know that when I quote Genesis, it's the same Genesis that Jesus is quoting? How do I know that when I read the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew 2,000 years later, that those are the actual words that Jesus spoke? How do I know that the letter that Paul wrote to Romans has been preserved enough over the years so that when I open up Romans 1, 19 through 20 and read to you what Paul said, that it's the same thing the church in the first century was hearing? How do we know that we can trust this book? It's an important question. I would think that there's really three main factors that help us understand how we can trust the Bible. The three biggest reasons we can trust the Bible we hold in our hands are preservation, consistency, and evidence. The three biggest reasons that I know we can trust this are preservation, consistency, and evidence. Here's what I mean. You guys may not know this. I find this fascinating. If you don't find this fascinating, I'm sorry. We're talking about Sabbath next week, and I'm real excited for it. But the preservation of Scripture, to me, is so crucial and interesting and vital that it's worth understanding how it happened. You may remember from reading the New Testament that sometimes there's these two groups of people that are put together, the scribes and the Pharisees. What you may not know is that to be a scribe was actually a full-on religious profession. It was a whole profession to be a scribe. And the whole job of a scribe is not necessarily to write new things, but to simply copy things that existed. The only way to get more copies of the book of Genesis is for someone to sit down and painstakingly copy by hand the book of Genesis, right? Gutenberg hadn't been around yet. We didn't have copiers, so we had to write things down by hand. And the process of doing this was excruciatingly detailed. And again, these are men, it was just men in that day, who have dedicated their entire lives to copying Scripture. And they had very strict rules around how they did it. The foremost rule that I've always appreciated is if they made a single mistake at all, no scratching out and moving on and writing a little note about what you meant, any mistake in the manuscript, you destroyed the whole thing. You burned the whole thing. Now listen, we might think, oh gosh, that sounds tedious at first, but I don't think you understand how tedious. Think about if I asked you, if it was your job in 2021 to hand copy the book of Genesis to perfection. Take the book of Genesis. It's about 50 chapters. I want you to write it out word for word. I want you to look at it in your Bible and I want you to write it down. You have to write it down in such a way that it's going to be legible and easy to read in a hundred years. There can't be anybody a hundred years from now that can't tell if that's a G or a C or an E or an F. It needs to be clear and legible. And if there's a single mistake at all, if you put a comma in the wrong part, if you put the quotations outside the period and they should be inside the period, whatever you do, if there's any mistakes, you have to destroy it and start over. Can you imagine how frustrating it would be to nail 43 chapters and in the 44th chapter you write a T instead of an S and you have to destroy the whole thing? That's what they would do. That's how serious they were about this work. Whenever they would approach the word Yahweh, they would stop and get up from their desk and put their pen down and go and wash their hands and pray a prayer and make sure they were ceremonially clean before they would write it down. When they would finish a document to check it, they knew exactly how many words were in the book. If we're using Genesis, they knew exactly how many words were in Genesis. So they'd finish it. It's perfect. It's two years of effort. And then they would start the counting. And they knew how many words had to be in their manuscript and how many words were in the original one. They knew that. And if it was wrong, if the count was off by one word, no matter what, you destroy those years of effort and you start over. They knew the middle word. If there's 50,000 words, they knew the 25,000th word. And they would count to it. And then in the new manuscript, they would count back to it. And if the middle word didn't match up, they would destroy the copy as imperfect. And it seems tedious, and maybe it seems over the top, but here's the thing. It worked. And we get affirmations every so often of just how well it worked. I won't chase this rabbit hole too much because it gets into the weeds, but suffice it to say that in terms of manuscripts, the older ones you can find, the better off you are. The older you can find it, the closer to the original it is, right? If you find some manuscripts that are 1,000 years old, that means that things were written 1,000 years before that. They're a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy, right? But if you can find something that's 1,800 years old, so the original was only written 200 years before that, well, now it's a copy of a copy. So the older it is, the more accurate it is. And there have been multiple times in the Christian world where we have translated our Bibles based on the oldest manuscripts that we could find and translated them all out and had them and they've been published and on the shelves for us to pick up and read. And then something will happen, like what happened with the Dead Sea Scrolls, I believe in the 1930s. And they'll find these scrolls that predate the ones that we've already found. They're actually older than the oldest ones that we have. And so then they frantically check, oh my gosh, these ones that we have, are they accurate to the older ones? And what they found out is that within 99.9%, they're accurate. That the newer ones we have are accurate to the old ones that we find every couple of years. Which means that this preservation, over time, it worked. It's accurate. The words that we read here are the very ones that were written by Paul, are the very things that were said by Jesus, are the very words of David that were quoted by Matthew. The words that we read are the ones that are written. This has been proven over and over again. We can also trust the Bible because of its consistency, because of how unified its message is. I've told you already that it was written by over 40 authors over the span of 1,400 years, over three continents, with three languages. And yet, there is not a single irreconcilable difference between any of the books or any of the words. And yet, it is entirely consistent with itself. It was written over that great span of time, yet not a single one of those authors introduced an idea that can't be supported by another author or that goes against what one of the other authors said. How can this be possible unless there is one author overseeing the writing of all of it? How can it be possible that all these men over all these cultures with all these languages and all these years can come together and produce one sound document that has no inconsistencies unless there's been one person orchestrating the writing of it all. And there are people who have dedicated their lives to tearing this book down. There are people who have dedicated their adult lives to finding imperfections in the text, to finding contradictions here that don't exist. There are emperors who have tried to burn it. There are societies who have tried to get rid of it. But the Bible stands the test of time. It's still here. It's still trustworthy. It's still the things that Jesus said back when he said them. And because of its consistency, we know that we can trust it. Finally, there's evidence. I won't get too far in the weeds on this, but do you know that the Bible, hundreds of years before it ever existed, I think Daniel is the one who primarily does this. Do you know the Bible predicts Alexander the Great and the Grecian Empire? And that the Bible predicts the Roman Empire? You know, we find artifacts all the time that show us that the stories in the Bible are true. I've been over to Israel and they take you from Jerusalem down this road through the valley of the shadow of death to get to this little town called Jericho. And if you know your old Bible, your old Bible, your Old Testament well, you'll know that Joshua marched around the walls of Jericho seven times and then the walls fell. And if you go to Jericho today and you look at where they've excavated the wall and you can see the layers of it all the way down to the very bottom, that when you get close to the bottom down there, that there is a layer about this thick of ash and char. I've seen it with my own eyes from the time Jericho was burned to the ground, just like it says in the book of Joshua. In the 60s, a mathematician put this experiment together, and I've always found it to be really interesting. It's not an experiment, it's just an illustration of the prophecies in the Old Testament. If you take all the prophecies in the Old Testament that are about the Messiah, that by his stripes he will be healed, that he will be born of a virgin, that he'll be from both Nazareth and Bethlehem, that he'll be from the line of David. If you take all of the prophecies that are made about Jesus in the Old Testament, that are made about this messianic figure in the Old Testament, and you try to have one life that could possibly fulfill all of those prophecies, that the statistical probability of that, of one person fulfilling all of the prophecies that Jesus fulfilled, is the same as covering the state of Texas a foot deep, it's either a foot deep or three feet deep, in silver dollars. You paint one of those silver dollars red and you just drop it in there with the rest of them. Then you get on a plane, you fly over Texas, you parachute down, you land on the coins, you bend down and you pick up the red one. There's the same chances of you doing that as there is of anyone ever living a life that fulfills all the prophecies that Jesus fulfilled. And yet, he lived it. Jesus bears out the truth of Scripture. We see in Jesus' life enough evidence to know that everything around that is true. So I think, and I've come to a place where I believe we can trust Scripture because we can trust the preservation of it, we can trust the consistency of it, and we can trust the evidence that bears out from it. Now, I'll tell you this, for the extra nerdy ones, I actually have a whole class that I developed that I did a lifetime ago in apologetics, and I have about 12 pages of notes. I only shared with you guys like four pages of notes this morning. If you want more on this stuff, if you want to go more in depth, let me know and I'll email that to you. If you have other questions, let me know and I will respond to those. But it feels appropriate to close out this sermon by offering you a little challenge. We've looked at the Bible. We've asked the questions. How can we trust it? Why is it such a big deal? It's the inspired word of God. It's a special revelation to us. We got it through a trustworthy series of events that have rendered it whole, and now we can trust it because of all the reasons that I just went through. And so it seems appropriate to issue this challenge to you in 2021. You may already be a couple days behind and that's all right, but here's the thing. Here's your challenge. I want to challenge you guys to read more of the Bible this year than you ever have before. That's the challenge. That's the challenge for us at Grace. I'm going to engage in that. I want to challenge you to read more of the Bible this year than you ever have before in a single year. That's going to mean different things for different people. You may be thinking to yourself, well, that's great. I've never read the Bible before. All right, well, then it's a low bar for you. Enjoy your success. I hope that it would continue. Set the bar higher for future years, but take a step. A lot of us are the kind of people who have sat down a bunch of times determined to read the Bible. Let this be the time that it sticks. Find a good pace that you can go at, a good rhythm for yourself. Let the Bible read itself to you. On the Bible app, you can have it read itself to you in your car or on your walk. I'm going to read through the Bible this year. I started last year and then I fell off the wagon. I'm going to make it my goal to read through the Bible this year. I'm just going to listen to the Bible this year in addition to what I'm reading on a regular basis. And it's worth stating that the Bible was actually written to be read aloud. So listening to it is a really good way to consume Scripture. If you're one who reads the Bible regularly, step it up. Let's let 2021 be the year that we read more of the Bible than we ever have. That's my challenge to you. All right, next week I'm going to come back and we're going to talk about this idea of Sabbath. What is it and why is it so important? But for now, I'm going to pray and we're going to close out the service with one more song. Pray with me. Father, we love you. Thank you so much for your word. Thank you that we can trust it. Thank you that we can build our lives on it. Thank you that it will never let us down. Thank you that it has stood the test of time and is trustworthy. Father, if we have any other questions about your word, give us the courage and the tenacity to seek those out. Give us the humility to accept what is true. Give us the clarity to reject what isn't. God, I pray once again that as we go throughout our weeks this week, that we would be people and instruments of peace for you in this country and a time when we need it so badly. God, thank you for your word. Make us students of it. Develop in us a hunger for it. In Jesus' name, amen.

It's good to get to be back with you in the saddle preaching live. I've been excited for this morning and I'm excited for this series. This series, Things You Should Know, I think that's what we're calling it. Yeah, it's right there on the screen next to me. Things You Should Know. I forgot what we named it back in the beginning of December, but I haven't forgotten what it's about. And it's based on this idea that there's things that we should all know as Christians, or that we at least nod along with as Christians, that we pretend that we know, that we may not actually know, right? Like there's a kind of a Christianese and another language that's spoken around churches. And I think sometimes we just kind of nod along with that because we don't want to look or feel dumb. And I know how it goes. I mean, you join a small group for the first time. You haven't really been involved in church in a while or just kind of cursory involvement. And then you show up in a small group and people start talking about stuff. And you might not know what they're talking about, but you don't want to feel dumb or silly or uninformed or make yourself look bad. So you don't say anything. And then you've been there so long that now I have to be one of the people that knows these things too. And so we just kind of nod along when people talk about grace and mercy or throw out Bible words like sanctification, and we just kind of act like we know what they're talking about when sometimes we really don't. And one of the things that I want you to know is that it's okay not to know stuff. It's actually really great to ask questions. One of my favorite things to do is to have my men's Bible study and have people in that study who are not very familiar with the text that we're covering because the questions that they ask are the best, but you have to be brave to ask questions because when you ask a question, you're admitting that I don't know this thing. And there's some stuff in the church that I think we nod along with, that we act like we know, when maybe we don't. And we want to be brave for you this month and ask those questions for you this month. And so this morning, the title of the sermon is simply the Bible. Questions that we might have about the Bible. I'm going to look at three questions that I think everybody has about Scripture that we might not know the answers to, but that I think every Christian should know. And now I'll warn you up front, this is not a normal sermon. This is far more informative. It's informational, this sermon is. The things that I'm going to share with you this morning are things that I wasn't exposed to until I was in Bible college, taking theology classes, or in grad school, in seminary, taking more theology classes. And there's a lot more to it than what we're going to cover this morning, but I wanted to take a morning, one Sunday, and address with you some common questions about the Bible, because again, I think every believer should know the answers to these questions. So I'll say up front, for some of you, you're going to love this. You're going to love it. Your notebook is out. You're ready. You're going to write these things down, and if you're a note taker, there's going to be a lot to write down. So get ready. Get your best possible pen. Some of you might not love this. This might not be your thing. And just to know, just for you to know, when I was praying before the sermon, my final words to God were, Father, make this helpful. And if it's not helpful, make it quick. Okay, so I'm with you. There's a lot of information, but I think you need to know this stuff, and I hope that you'll be interested in it. And actually, I want to know what you learned this morning. If I tell you something that you didn't know before, email me and tell me what you learned and tell me what you enjoyed. If there's other questions that you've always wanted to ask, email me and ask those questions. You can even tell me that I heard my friend ask this, so you don't even have to throw yourself under the bus. But get those questions to me. Get your responses to me. I want us to interact with the things we're talking about in this series. But I said I was going to give you three questions about the Bible that I think we should all be able to answer. And the first one is this. Why is the Bible a big deal? Why is the Bible such a big deal? Why do we make such a fuss about it? And it may seem like I'm going too simple on this, but I think it's an important question. Think about it. Think about where we place the Bible in our lives. I tell you guys all the time that there's no greater habit that anyone in their life could have than to read the Bible every day, than to spend time with God through prayer and in His Word every day. So we make a big deal out of the Bible. We hold the Bible up as the foremost authority in our lives. We believe and we teach at Grace that if you're walking with God, that you won't allow anything into your life until it's filtered through Scripture. That the biggest authority in your life of whether something is right or wrong or good or bad or from God or not is to go to Scripture and see what does it say. The entire church is built around the teachings of the Bible. Wars have been fought over it. People have died to preserve it. So it's worth asking the question, why is the Bible such a big deal? Well, the short answer is this. The Bible is a big deal because it's God's special revelation to us. We make such a fuss out of the Bible. The Bible is a big deal because it is God's special revelation to us. Now, here's what I mean. That word revelation, we're already getting into some technical Christian terms. That's not really a Christian term. That just means something that's revealed. It's the same root word there. It just means to reveal something. And so what we understand about ourselves and what you understand about you, whether you've ever thought about this or not, is that people can only know about you what you choose to reveal to them, right? If you meet somebody at a dinner party, you know you're never going to talk to them again. You can make up a totally false identity. They'll never know. You can tell them that you used to be a professional ball player. They won't know the difference. They'll Google you later. You won't exist, and it's fine. You'll never have that interaction again. But they only know about you what you choose to reveal about yourself. So when you meet someone in passing, it's just a cursory glance. They only know you by the way that you dress, by what you reveal, by how you present yourself to the world. The more someone is around you, the more they see you react and interact and respond, the more they learn about you and what's there. But again, people can only know about you what you choose to reveal to them about yourself, right? Well, the same is true of God. We can only know about God what he chooses to reveal about himself. And with him, it's in particular no more and no less. So with God, if we understand revelation to be what God chooses to reveal to us about himself, that we would get to know God the same way we would get to know anybody in our life, the same way other people would get to know us, then we have to understand that with God, there's two kinds of revelation. There's general revelation and special revelation. The way that I think about those is this. General revelation makes us aware of the presence of God, and special revelation gives us the details of that presence. General revelation is stuff that everybody can see. And Romans 1 actually sums up general revelation like this. This is what Paul says in Romans 1, looking at verse 19. He says, So he says, listen, God wrote himself in nature. Anybody who looks outward at nature, at the trees, at the seasons, at the rhythms of nature, the way the earth rotates around the sun, at how huge the universe is, at how small it can be, at the miracle of birth, at just the essence of life. As you look at nature, it points to a creator God. And as you look inward on what is written in your nature, it points to a creator God. Our moral compass, the fact that every civilization ever has prized bravery and bemoaned cowardice, has said that telling the truth is good and that being deceptive is bad. That moral code was written on our hearts by God. On our hearts, we have a longing for our Creator. So whether we look without or within, when we look at nature, God has written himself in nature. That is his general revelation, making all of us aware of his existence. But his special revelation, where he gives us the details of that existence, that's in the Bible. And here's what's incredible about that. What if we didn't have the Bible? What if we didn't know the details of this God that exists? Then he would just be to us this being that existed distant and cold, who had the authority to punish us, to start our life and to take our life, to manipulate circumstances to make us joyful or to make us miserable. It would be a God that we would hope to try to appease, but we wouldn't really know who he was. It would be a God that would inevitably incur fear and myth. But in God's goodness, he gave us the Bible. And it gives us the details of his existence. It's in his words that we find out, oh goodness, this God that created me loves me. This God that created me actually only created me so that I could spend eternity with him. That's how much he wants to be with me. This God who created me sent his son to die for me. This God who created me is love. He is goodness. He is gracious. He is merciful. This book tells us all we need to know about the God who created us. It is God's special revelation of himself to us. This is why we hold it in such high esteem. Because we believe that in these pages are the very words of God. And that this is, he could have chosen to reveal himself any way he wanted to, but what he chose to do is to reveal himself in the pages of Scripture. And in here we find him and who he is. It's an invitation to know our God better. That's why we make such a big deal out of the Bible. Now, the next question. And this one is important. I hope that some of you guys have asked this. I hope that some of you know some of the answers to this. But I think it's an important question. How did we even get the Bible? How did we get the Bible? How is it that I can go to the store and buy this, and these are the books that God wants in here, and these are the words that God wants in here, and these are the things that were written down however many years ago. How do we even get this? Because I don't know if you know this about the Bible, but the Bible is composed of an Old Testament and a New Testament. It totals 66 books. There's 39 in the Old Testament and 27 in the New Testament. And you may or may not know, I mean, you probably know that there's been a lot of people who have contributed to writing the Bible, but there's actually over 40 authors that contribute to the Bible. Did you know that the Bible was written over the span of about 1,400 years across three different continents, Africa and Asia and Europe? And that it was written actually in three different languages, Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic. And through all of that time, through the span of 1,400 years, through the minds of over 40 authors on three continents and however many different cultures that was, and in three different languages, God inspired this written word. So how did it get to us? It's a fair question. When we talk about how it got to us, we can really talk about it in the Old and the New Testament. The Old Testament is pretty easy. In ancient Israel, there was a ruling body called the Sanhedrin. That was a lot like our Senate. It was made up of different parties. The two most famous parties in the Sanhedrin were the Pharisees and the Sadducees. We've probably heard of those before, at least the Pharisees, I would think. And then there was other little parties that weren't as influential, but were there, the Essenes and the Zealots. You can think of those as like the modern day libertarians. I know that my friend Tom Sartorius will appreciate that very much. But the Sanhedrin was made up of different parties, and those parties ruled Israel. It was a religious rule, not too different from what we see in Muslim countries today. And the Sanhedrin got together somewhere around 250 BC, or maybe a little bit after, and one of the things that they affirmed was that the holy scriptures they had were the Holy Scriptures that would serve as the Old Testament. To them, it was 24 books that they called the Tanakh. To us, it's 39 books that we call the Old Testament, but they're the exact same. They grouped up a bunch of different books that we have separated out together, like Kings and Chronicles was one book, and now it's four. So they would group things together like that, but it's the same. Our 39 books are the same 24 books that they affirmed in 250 BC. And the Sanhedrin looked around and voted and they said, this is it. These are the Holy Scriptures. This is the Tanakh, the law and the prophets. In the New Testament, when we hear Jesus or one of the other writers refer to the law and the prophets, he's referring to the Old Testament, to the Tanakh. And that Old Testament has not been changed since 250 BC when they affirmed it. And the last book was Malachi, and it was written around 400 BC. So it had already existed as one big volume of works for at least 150 years before they ever addressed it. It hasn't changed since 400 BC, and it's not going to change in the future. The Old Testament is done, and that's how we got it. Now, the New Testament is interesting too, because at the time of Christ, there was a lot of writings. There's a lot of people writing a lot of different things. And after Christ left the scene, there was one universal church. We call it the Catholic Church. And the Catholic Church was structured. They say that there was a pope in the line of succession of Peter, that there was the next guy who was in charge of the church, and the next guy after that. And then there's bishops all that fan out depending on where the church is based on geography. And every now and again, they would have what was called councils. And all the leaders from all the different churches and parishes, I suppose, and all the different areas would get together in this one city and they would debate theological ideas. And they would decide, this is something that the whole church believes. This is something that we are going to cast aside. An example of this is the Council of Nicaea, where they decided without a doubt that Christ is God. Before that, there was some disagreement in the church. Some people thought that Christ was simply a man, that he was a prophet, like the Islam religion claims that he is. Other people say, no, he is deity. He is God incarnate in the flesh. So they got together, they talked about it, they voted on it, and they decided moving forward, the Christian church believes that Jesus is the Son of God. It's a really pivotal council, and we still affirm that. But what we find is that towards about 393 and 398, there was two councils, the Council of Hippo and the Council of Carthage, where those people got together and they voted on what books were going to be included in the New Testament. This is called the canonization of Scripture, the complete, done, codified work. And they voted on which books would be included. And what's important to point out here is it wasn't like they all brought 60 books to the table and then they slowly whittled it down to these 27. They voted on the 27 books that we commonly accept as Scripture that were commonly accepted then. All they did is agree on what was essentially already agreed upon. If you don't believe me, I actually have a quote this morning. I don't do this a lot, okay? I don't belabor things like this a lot because I think they're boring and no one cares. But I think this morning it's important. I've got a quote for you by a guy named F.F. Bruce. You know he's important because he doesn't use a name. It's just his initials. And in the church world, that means you're super smart and also pretentious. Get over yourself, F.F. But F.F. Bruce said this about the councils, and I think it's great. Read with me here. That's a big, long, fancy way of saying they didn't introduce any new ideas. All they did is put a rubber stamp on, yep, these are the books that we hold as Holy Scripture. And it's the same 27 books that we have today. They affirmed 27 books in the New Testament. We have those same 27 books now. So that's how we got the Old Testament and the New Testament. You may want to know, another question you should ask is, how did they determine which books were allowed in? What was the criteria? Well, for a book to be included in the canon, it had to be apostolic, harmonious, accepted, and inspired. Again, for a book to be included in the New Testament, it had to meet these requirements. It had to be apostolic, had to be harmonious, had to be commonly accepted, and it had to be inspired. And when I say apostolic, what I mean is this. An apostle is someone who has an eyewitness account of Christ. So for a book to be apostolic, it has to be written by someone who has seen Jesus in the flesh, which is a really easy way to say that the canon is closed. Can God appear to somebody and speak to someone and ask them to write something down on his behalf? Sure he could if he wanted to, but he doesn't do that anymore in a way that's going to be included in Scripture. We're not going to add to the Bible because one of the ways to get included in the New Testament is to be someone who's an eyewitness of Christ. And since all those people are dead, we're not accepting any more entries in the Bible. It has to be harmonious, meaning it has to agree with other books that are accepted in Scripture. It can't disagree with the Tanakh. It can't disagree with the teachings in the Old Testament. It can't disagree with the teachings and the quotes of Jesus. The Gospels were the first New Testament books written, so it can't disagree with any of those. It has to be in harmony with the rest of the books included. It's got to be accepted, meaning there's no surprises at these councils. Nobody brought this thing that was written down by somebody else and said, hey, would you consider this? The books that were agreed upon in Hippo and in Carthage were books that everybody was already familiar with, that those guys had taught their congregations out of many, many times. They were commonly accepted books. And then they had to be inspired. And really, the first three things are ways to determine if they felt like it was inspired by God. And this is an important word. We talk about the Bible being inspired. But I don't know how often we talk about what that means. Did God take over the minds of these men and these women and they wrote it down verbatim as the Holy Spirit spoke it to them? Was God basically dictating to them what the Bible was supposed to say? The way that we think about inspiration and how it works, and I hold this with a loose hand because it's hard to be certain how inspiration works. The only people who can explain it to us are people who never wrote the Bible. So it's just guesses. But the fancy word for it, if you're interested in such a thing, is verbal plenary inspiration. And basically what it means is the Holy Spirit guides your thoughts and your ideas and then your personality and your intellect takes over and expresses those things. So the Holy Spirit's gonna present an idea to Paul and he's gonna write it out and it's gonna look a lot different than when James writes something out or when David writes something out or when Solomon writes something out. It's almost like if you were to go to the field next to the church. Now, a lot of you haven't been here in so long that you've forgotten that there's a field over there, but there is. It'd be like going to that field and telling you to take a lap once in an SUV and once in a sports car. The journey is going to be the same. The lap's going to be the same, but the experience in that lap is going to be different based, and that lap is going to be different based on the car that you took. It's going to feel different in the SUV. It's going to get done in a different amount of time. It's going to feel different in the sports car. It's the same way with translation and or with inspiration. God speaks to one person, and the way that that person writes it down is going to be different than the way that this person writes it down. But the path and the impact and the point are the same. So in that way, God breathed Scripture into these authors by directing their thoughts and directing their hearts and their heads to the ideas that he wanted them to write down. So it's not unless a book is inspired, is harmonious, is accepted, and is apostolic do we include it in the New Testament. That's how we got our Bible. And the last question I want to address today is how do we know we can trust it? And this is an important question. How do we know that this book that I hold in my hands is the same book, that these 39 books are the exact same as they were when they got approved by the Sanhedrin in 250 BC? How do I know that when I quote Genesis, it's the same Genesis that Jesus is quoting? How do I know that when I read the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew 2,000 years later, that those are the actual words that Jesus spoke? How do I know that the letter that Paul wrote to Romans has been preserved enough over the years so that when I open up Romans 1, 19 through 20 and read to you what Paul said, that it's the same thing the church in the first century was hearing? How do we know that we can trust this book? It's an important question. I would think that there's really three main factors that help us understand how we can trust the Bible. The three biggest reasons we can trust the Bible we hold in our hands are preservation, consistency, and evidence. The three biggest reasons that I know we can trust this are preservation, consistency, and evidence. Here's what I mean. You guys may not know this. I find this fascinating. If you don't find this fascinating, I'm sorry. We're talking about Sabbath next week, and I'm real excited for it. But the preservation of Scripture, to me, is so crucial and interesting and vital that it's worth understanding how it happened. You may remember from reading the New Testament that sometimes there's these two groups of people that are put together, the scribes and the Pharisees. What you may not know is that to be a scribe was actually a full-on religious profession. It was a whole profession to be a scribe. And the whole job of a scribe is not necessarily to write new things, but to simply copy things that existed. The only way to get more copies of the book of Genesis is for someone to sit down and painstakingly copy by hand the book of Genesis, right? Gutenberg hadn't been around yet. We didn't have copiers, so we had to write things down by hand. And the process of doing this was excruciatingly detailed. And again, these are men, it was just men in that day, who have dedicated their entire lives to copying Scripture. And they had very strict rules around how they did it. The foremost rule that I've always appreciated is if they made a single mistake at all, no scratching out and moving on and writing a little note about what you meant, any mistake in the manuscript, you destroyed the whole thing. You burned the whole thing. Now listen, we might think, oh gosh, that sounds tedious at first, but I don't think you understand how tedious. Think about if I asked you, if it was your job in 2021 to hand copy the book of Genesis to perfection. Take the book of Genesis. It's about 50 chapters. I want you to write it out word for word. I want you to look at it in your Bible and I want you to write it down. You have to write it down in such a way that it's going to be legible and easy to read in a hundred years. There can't be anybody a hundred years from now that can't tell if that's a G or a C or an E or an F. It needs to be clear and legible. And if there's a single mistake at all, if you put a comma in the wrong part, if you put the quotations outside the period and they should be inside the period, whatever you do, if there's any mistakes, you have to destroy it and start over. Can you imagine how frustrating it would be to nail 43 chapters and in the 44th chapter you write a T instead of an S and you have to destroy the whole thing? That's what they would do. That's how serious they were about this work. Whenever they would approach the word Yahweh, they would stop and get up from their desk and put their pen down and go and wash their hands and pray a prayer and make sure they were ceremonially clean before they would write it down. When they would finish a document to check it, they knew exactly how many words were in the book. If we're using Genesis, they knew exactly how many words were in Genesis. So they'd finish it. It's perfect. It's two years of effort. And then they would start the counting. And they knew how many words had to be in their manuscript and how many words were in the original one. They knew that. And if it was wrong, if the count was off by one word, no matter what, you destroy those years of effort and you start over. They knew the middle word. If there's 50,000 words, they knew the 25,000th word. And they would count to it. And then in the new manuscript, they would count back to it. And if the middle word didn't match up, they would destroy the copy as imperfect. And it seems tedious, and maybe it seems over the top, but here's the thing. It worked. And we get affirmations every so often of just how well it worked. I won't chase this rabbit hole too much because it gets into the weeds, but suffice it to say that in terms of manuscripts, the older ones you can find, the better off you are. The older you can find it, the closer to the original it is, right? If you find some manuscripts that are 1,000 years old, that means that things were written 1,000 years before that. They're a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy, right? But if you can find something that's 1,800 years old, so the original was only written 200 years before that, well, now it's a copy of a copy. So the older it is, the more accurate it is. And there have been multiple times in the Christian world where we have translated our Bibles based on the oldest manuscripts that we could find and translated them all out and had them and they've been published and on the shelves for us to pick up and read. And then something will happen, like what happened with the Dead Sea Scrolls, I believe in the 1930s. And they'll find these scrolls that predate the ones that we've already found. They're actually older than the oldest ones that we have. And so then they frantically check, oh my gosh, these ones that we have, are they accurate to the older ones? And what they found out is that within 99.9%, they're accurate. That the newer ones we have are accurate to the old ones that we find every couple of years. Which means that this preservation, over time, it worked. It's accurate. The words that we read here are the very ones that were written by Paul, are the very things that were said by Jesus, are the very words of David that were quoted by Matthew. The words that we read are the ones that are written. This has been proven over and over again. We can also trust the Bible because of its consistency, because of how unified its message is. I've told you already that it was written by over 40 authors over the span of 1,400 years, over three continents, with three languages. And yet, there is not a single irreconcilable difference between any of the books or any of the words. And yet, it is entirely consistent with itself. It was written over that great span of time, yet not a single one of those authors introduced an idea that can't be supported by another author or that goes against what one of the other authors said. How can this be possible unless there is one author overseeing the writing of all of it? How can it be possible that all these men over all these cultures with all these languages and all these years can come together and produce one sound document that has no inconsistencies unless there's been one person orchestrating the writing of it all. And there are people who have dedicated their lives to tearing this book down. There are people who have dedicated their adult lives to finding imperfections in the text, to finding contradictions here that don't exist. There are emperors who have tried to burn it. There are societies who have tried to get rid of it. But the Bible stands the test of time. It's still here. It's still trustworthy. It's still the things that Jesus said back when he said them. And because of its consistency, we know that we can trust it. Finally, there's evidence. I won't get too far in the weeds on this, but do you know that the Bible, hundreds of years before it ever existed, I think Daniel is the one who primarily does this. Do you know the Bible predicts Alexander the Great and the Grecian Empire? And that the Bible predicts the Roman Empire? You know, we find artifacts all the time that show us that the stories in the Bible are true. I've been over to Israel and they take you from Jerusalem down this road through the valley of the shadow of death to get to this little town called Jericho. And if you know your old Bible, your old Bible, your Old Testament well, you'll know that Joshua marched around the walls of Jericho seven times and then the walls fell. And if you go to Jericho today and you look at where they've excavated the wall and you can see the layers of it all the way down to the very bottom, that when you get close to the bottom down there, that there is a layer about this thick of ash and char. I've seen it with my own eyes from the time Jericho was burned to the ground, just like it says in the book of Joshua. In the 60s, a mathematician put this experiment together, and I've always found it to be really interesting. It's not an experiment, it's just an illustration of the prophecies in the Old Testament. If you take all the prophecies in the Old Testament that are about the Messiah, that by his stripes he will be healed, that he will be born of a virgin, that he'll be from both Nazareth and Bethlehem, that he'll be from the line of David. If you take all of the prophecies that are made about Jesus in the Old Testament, that are made about this messianic figure in the Old Testament, and you try to have one life that could possibly fulfill all of those prophecies, that the statistical probability of that, of one person fulfilling all of the prophecies that Jesus fulfilled, is the same as covering the state of Texas a foot deep, it's either a foot deep or three feet deep, in silver dollars. You paint one of those silver dollars red and you just drop it in there with the rest of them. Then you get on a plane, you fly over Texas, you parachute down, you land on the coins, you bend down and you pick up the red one. There's the same chances of you doing that as there is of anyone ever living a life that fulfills all the prophecies that Jesus fulfilled. And yet, he lived it. Jesus bears out the truth of Scripture. We see in Jesus' life enough evidence to know that everything around that is true. So I think, and I've come to a place where I believe we can trust Scripture because we can trust the preservation of it, we can trust the consistency of it, and we can trust the evidence that bears out from it. Now, I'll tell you this, for the extra nerdy ones, I actually have a whole class that I developed that I did a lifetime ago in apologetics, and I have about 12 pages of notes. I only shared with you guys like four pages of notes this morning. If you want more on this stuff, if you want to go more in depth, let me know and I'll email that to you. If you have other questions, let me know and I will respond to those. But it feels appropriate to close out this sermon by offering you a little challenge. We've looked at the Bible. We've asked the questions. How can we trust it? Why is it such a big deal? It's the inspired word of God. It's a special revelation to us. We got it through a trustworthy series of events that have rendered it whole, and now we can trust it because of all the reasons that I just went through. And so it seems appropriate to issue this challenge to you in 2021. You may already be a couple days behind and that's all right, but here's the thing. Here's your challenge. I want to challenge you guys to read more of the Bible this year than you ever have before. That's the challenge. That's the challenge for us at Grace. I'm going to engage in that. I want to challenge you to read more of the Bible this year than you ever have before in a single year. That's going to mean different things for different people. You may be thinking to yourself, well, that's great. I've never read the Bible before. All right, well, then it's a low bar for you. Enjoy your success. I hope that it would continue. Set the bar higher for future years, but take a step. A lot of us are the kind of people who have sat down a bunch of times determined to read the Bible. Let this be the time that it sticks. Find a good pace that you can go at, a good rhythm for yourself. Let the Bible read itself to you. On the Bible app, you can have it read itself to you in your car or on your walk. I'm going to read through the Bible this year. I started last year and then I fell off the wagon. I'm going to make it my goal to read through the Bible this year. I'm just going to listen to the Bible this year in addition to what I'm reading on a regular basis. And it's worth stating that the Bible was actually written to be read aloud. So listening to it is a really good way to consume Scripture. If you're one who reads the Bible regularly, step it up. Let's let 2021 be the year that we read more of the Bible than we ever have. That's my challenge to you. All right, next week I'm going to come back and we're going to talk about this idea of Sabbath. What is it and why is it so important? But for now, I'm going to pray and we're going to close out the service with one more song. Pray with me. Father, we love you. Thank you so much for your word. Thank you that we can trust it. Thank you that we can build our lives on it. Thank you that it will never let us down. Thank you that it has stood the test of time and is trustworthy. Father, if we have any other questions about your word, give us the courage and the tenacity to seek those out. Give us the humility to accept what is true. Give us the clarity to reject what isn't. God, I pray once again that as we go throughout our weeks this week, that we would be people and instruments of peace for you in this country and a time when we need it so badly. God, thank you for your word. Make us students of it. Develop in us a hunger for it. In Jesus' name, amen.

It's good to get to be back with you in the saddle preaching live. I've been excited for this morning and I'm excited for this series. This series, Things You Should Know, I think that's what we're calling it. Yeah, it's right there on the screen next to me. Things You Should Know. I forgot what we named it back in the beginning of December, but I haven't forgotten what it's about. And it's based on this idea that there's things that we should all know as Christians, or that we at least nod along with as Christians, that we pretend that we know, that we may not actually know, right? Like there's a kind of a Christianese and another language that's spoken around churches. And I think sometimes we just kind of nod along with that because we don't want to look or feel dumb. And I know how it goes. I mean, you join a small group for the first time. You haven't really been involved in church in a while or just kind of cursory involvement. And then you show up in a small group and people start talking about stuff. And you might not know what they're talking about, but you don't want to feel dumb or silly or uninformed or make yourself look bad. So you don't say anything. And then you've been there so long that now I have to be one of the people that knows these things too. And so we just kind of nod along when people talk about grace and mercy or throw out Bible words like sanctification, and we just kind of act like we know what they're talking about when sometimes we really don't. And one of the things that I want you to know is that it's okay not to know stuff. It's actually really great to ask questions. One of my favorite things to do is to have my men's Bible study and have people in that study who are not very familiar with the text that we're covering because the questions that they ask are the best, but you have to be brave to ask questions because when you ask a question, you're admitting that I don't know this thing. And there's some stuff in the church that I think we nod along with, that we act like we know, when maybe we don't. And we want to be brave for you this month and ask those questions for you this month. And so this morning, the title of the sermon is simply the Bible. Questions that we might have about the Bible. I'm going to look at three questions that I think everybody has about Scripture that we might not know the answers to, but that I think every Christian should know. And now I'll warn you up front, this is not a normal sermon. This is far more informative. It's informational, this sermon is. The things that I'm going to share with you this morning are things that I wasn't exposed to until I was in Bible college, taking theology classes, or in grad school, in seminary, taking more theology classes. And there's a lot more to it than what we're going to cover this morning, but I wanted to take a morning, one Sunday, and address with you some common questions about the Bible, because again, I think every believer should know the answers to these questions. So I'll say up front, for some of you, you're going to love this. You're going to love it. Your notebook is out. You're ready. You're going to write these things down, and if you're a note taker, there's going to be a lot to write down. So get ready. Get your best possible pen. Some of you might not love this. This might not be your thing. And just to know, just for you to know, when I was praying before the sermon, my final words to God were, Father, make this helpful. And if it's not helpful, make it quick. Okay, so I'm with you. There's a lot of information, but I think you need to know this stuff, and I hope that you'll be interested in it. And actually, I want to know what you learned this morning. If I tell you something that you didn't know before, email me and tell me what you learned and tell me what you enjoyed. If there's other questions that you've always wanted to ask, email me and ask those questions. You can even tell me that I heard my friend ask this, so you don't even have to throw yourself under the bus. But get those questions to me. Get your responses to me. I want us to interact with the things we're talking about in this series. But I said I was going to give you three questions about the Bible that I think we should all be able to answer. And the first one is this. Why is the Bible a big deal? Why is the Bible such a big deal? Why do we make such a fuss about it? And it may seem like I'm going too simple on this, but I think it's an important question. Think about it. Think about where we place the Bible in our lives. I tell you guys all the time that there's no greater habit that anyone in their life could have than to read the Bible every day, than to spend time with God through prayer and in His Word every day. So we make a big deal out of the Bible. We hold the Bible up as the foremost authority in our lives. We believe and we teach at Grace that if you're walking with God, that you won't allow anything into your life until it's filtered through Scripture. That the biggest authority in your life of whether something is right or wrong or good or bad or from God or not is to go to Scripture and see what does it say. The entire church is built around the teachings of the Bible. Wars have been fought over it. People have died to preserve it. So it's worth asking the question, why is the Bible such a big deal? Well, the short answer is this. The Bible is a big deal because it's God's special revelation to us. We make such a fuss out of the Bible. The Bible is a big deal because it is God's special revelation to us. Now, here's what I mean. That word revelation, we're already getting into some technical Christian terms. That's not really a Christian term. That just means something that's revealed. It's the same root word there. It just means to reveal something. And so what we understand about ourselves and what you understand about you, whether you've ever thought about this or not, is that people can only know about you what you choose to reveal to them, right? If you meet somebody at a dinner party, you know you're never going to talk to them again. You can make up a totally false identity. They'll never know. You can tell them that you used to be a professional ball player. They won't know the difference. They'll Google you later. You won't exist, and it's fine. You'll never have that interaction again. But they only know about you what you choose to reveal about yourself. So when you meet someone in passing, it's just a cursory glance. They only know you by the way that you dress, by what you reveal, by how you present yourself to the world. The more someone is around you, the more they see you react and interact and respond, the more they learn about you and what's there. But again, people can only know about you what you choose to reveal to them about yourself, right? Well, the same is true of God. We can only know about God what he chooses to reveal about himself. And with him, it's in particular no more and no less. So with God, if we understand revelation to be what God chooses to reveal to us about himself, that we would get to know God the same way we would get to know anybody in our life, the same way other people would get to know us, then we have to understand that with God, there's two kinds of revelation. There's general revelation and special revelation. The way that I think about those is this. General revelation makes us aware of the presence of God, and special revelation gives us the details of that presence. General revelation is stuff that everybody can see. And Romans 1 actually sums up general revelation like this. This is what Paul says in Romans 1, looking at verse 19. He says, So he says, listen, God wrote himself in nature. Anybody who looks outward at nature, at the trees, at the seasons, at the rhythms of nature, the way the earth rotates around the sun, at how huge the universe is, at how small it can be, at the miracle of birth, at just the essence of life. As you look at nature, it points to a creator God. And as you look inward on what is written in your nature, it points to a creator God. Our moral compass, the fact that every civilization ever has prized bravery and bemoaned cowardice, has said that telling the truth is good and that being deceptive is bad. That moral code was written on our hearts by God. On our hearts, we have a longing for our Creator. So whether we look without or within, when we look at nature, God has written himself in nature. That is his general revelation, making all of us aware of his existence. But his special revelation, where he gives us the details of that existence, that's in the Bible. And here's what's incredible about that. What if we didn't have the Bible? What if we didn't know the details of this God that exists? Then he would just be to us this being that existed distant and cold, who had the authority to punish us, to start our life and to take our life, to manipulate circumstances to make us joyful or to make us miserable. It would be a God that we would hope to try to appease, but we wouldn't really know who he was. It would be a God that would inevitably incur fear and myth. But in God's goodness, he gave us the Bible. And it gives us the details of his existence. It's in his words that we find out, oh goodness, this God that created me loves me. This God that created me actually only created me so that I could spend eternity with him. That's how much he wants to be with me. This God who created me sent his son to die for me. This God who created me is love. He is goodness. He is gracious. He is merciful. This book tells us all we need to know about the God who created us. It is God's special revelation of himself to us. This is why we hold it in such high esteem. Because we believe that in these pages are the very words of God. And that this is, he could have chosen to reveal himself any way he wanted to, but what he chose to do is to reveal himself in the pages of Scripture. And in here we find him and who he is. It's an invitation to know our God better. That's why we make such a big deal out of the Bible. Now, the next question. And this one is important. I hope that some of you guys have asked this. I hope that some of you know some of the answers to this. But I think it's an important question. How did we even get the Bible? How did we get the Bible? How is it that I can go to the store and buy this, and these are the books that God wants in here, and these are the words that God wants in here, and these are the things that were written down however many years ago. How do we even get this? Because I don't know if you know this about the Bible, but the Bible is composed of an Old Testament and a New Testament. It totals 66 books. There's 39 in the Old Testament and 27 in the New Testament. And you may or may not know, I mean, you probably know that there's been a lot of people who have contributed to writing the Bible, but there's actually over 40 authors that contribute to the Bible. Did you know that the Bible was written over the span of about 1,400 years across three different continents, Africa and Asia and Europe? And that it was written actually in three different languages, Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic. And through all of that time, through the span of 1,400 years, through the minds of over 40 authors on three continents and however many different cultures that was, and in three different languages, God inspired this written word. So how did it get to us? It's a fair question. When we talk about how it got to us, we can really talk about it in the Old and the New Testament. The Old Testament is pretty easy. In ancient Israel, there was a ruling body called the Sanhedrin. That was a lot like our Senate. It was made up of different parties. The two most famous parties in the Sanhedrin were the Pharisees and the Sadducees. We've probably heard of those before, at least the Pharisees, I would think. And then there was other little parties that weren't as influential, but were there, the Essenes and the Zealots. You can think of those as like the modern day libertarians. I know that my friend Tom Sartorius will appreciate that very much. But the Sanhedrin was made up of different parties, and those parties ruled Israel. It was a religious rule, not too different from what we see in Muslim countries today. And the Sanhedrin got together somewhere around 250 BC, or maybe a little bit after, and one of the things that they affirmed was that the holy scriptures they had were the Holy Scriptures that would serve as the Old Testament. To them, it was 24 books that they called the Tanakh. To us, it's 39 books that we call the Old Testament, but they're the exact same. They grouped up a bunch of different books that we have separated out together, like Kings and Chronicles was one book, and now it's four. So they would group things together like that, but it's the same. Our 39 books are the same 24 books that they affirmed in 250 BC. And the Sanhedrin looked around and voted and they said, this is it. These are the Holy Scriptures. This is the Tanakh, the law and the prophets. In the New Testament, when we hear Jesus or one of the other writers refer to the law and the prophets, he's referring to the Old Testament, to the Tanakh. And that Old Testament has not been changed since 250 BC when they affirmed it. And the last book was Malachi, and it was written around 400 BC. So it had already existed as one big volume of works for at least 150 years before they ever addressed it. It hasn't changed since 400 BC, and it's not going to change in the future. The Old Testament is done, and that's how we got it. Now, the New Testament is interesting too, because at the time of Christ, there was a lot of writings. There's a lot of people writing a lot of different things. And after Christ left the scene, there was one universal church. We call it the Catholic Church. And the Catholic Church was structured. They say that there was a pope in the line of succession of Peter, that there was the next guy who was in charge of the church, and the next guy after that. And then there's bishops all that fan out depending on where the church is based on geography. And every now and again, they would have what was called councils. And all the leaders from all the different churches and parishes, I suppose, and all the different areas would get together in this one city and they would debate theological ideas. And they would decide, this is something that the whole church believes. This is something that we are going to cast aside. An example of this is the Council of Nicaea, where they decided without a doubt that Christ is God. Before that, there was some disagreement in the church. Some people thought that Christ was simply a man, that he was a prophet, like the Islam religion claims that he is. Other people say, no, he is deity. He is God incarnate in the flesh. So they got together, they talked about it, they voted on it, and they decided moving forward, the Christian church believes that Jesus is the Son of God. It's a really pivotal council, and we still affirm that. But what we find is that towards about 393 and 398, there was two councils, the Council of Hippo and the Council of Carthage, where those people got together and they voted on what books were going to be included in the New Testament. This is called the canonization of Scripture, the complete, done, codified work. And they voted on which books would be included. And what's important to point out here is it wasn't like they all brought 60 books to the table and then they slowly whittled it down to these 27. They voted on the 27 books that we commonly accept as Scripture that were commonly accepted then. All they did is agree on what was essentially already agreed upon. If you don't believe me, I actually have a quote this morning. I don't do this a lot, okay? I don't belabor things like this a lot because I think they're boring and no one cares. But I think this morning it's important. I've got a quote for you by a guy named F.F. Bruce. You know he's important because he doesn't use a name. It's just his initials. And in the church world, that means you're super smart and also pretentious. Get over yourself, F.F. But F.F. Bruce said this about the councils, and I think it's great. Read with me here. That's a big, long, fancy way of saying they didn't introduce any new ideas. All they did is put a rubber stamp on, yep, these are the books that we hold as Holy Scripture. And it's the same 27 books that we have today. They affirmed 27 books in the New Testament. We have those same 27 books now. So that's how we got the Old Testament and the New Testament. You may want to know, another question you should ask is, how did they determine which books were allowed in? What was the criteria? Well, for a book to be included in the canon, it had to be apostolic, harmonious, accepted, and inspired. Again, for a book to be included in the New Testament, it had to meet these requirements. It had to be apostolic, had to be harmonious, had to be commonly accepted, and it had to be inspired. And when I say apostolic, what I mean is this. An apostle is someone who has an eyewitness account of Christ. So for a book to be apostolic, it has to be written by someone who has seen Jesus in the flesh, which is a really easy way to say that the canon is closed. Can God appear to somebody and speak to someone and ask them to write something down on his behalf? Sure he could if he wanted to, but he doesn't do that anymore in a way that's going to be included in Scripture. We're not going to add to the Bible because one of the ways to get included in the New Testament is to be someone who's an eyewitness of Christ. And since all those people are dead, we're not accepting any more entries in the Bible. It has to be harmonious, meaning it has to agree with other books that are accepted in Scripture. It can't disagree with the Tanakh. It can't disagree with the teachings in the Old Testament. It can't disagree with the teachings and the quotes of Jesus. The Gospels were the first New Testament books written, so it can't disagree with any of those. It has to be in harmony with the rest of the books included. It's got to be accepted, meaning there's no surprises at these councils. Nobody brought this thing that was written down by somebody else and said, hey, would you consider this? The books that were agreed upon in Hippo and in Carthage were books that everybody was already familiar with, that those guys had taught their congregations out of many, many times. They were commonly accepted books. And then they had to be inspired. And really, the first three things are ways to determine if they felt like it was inspired by God. And this is an important word. We talk about the Bible being inspired. But I don't know how often we talk about what that means. Did God take over the minds of these men and these women and they wrote it down verbatim as the Holy Spirit spoke it to them? Was God basically dictating to them what the Bible was supposed to say? The way that we think about inspiration and how it works, and I hold this with a loose hand because it's hard to be certain how inspiration works. The only people who can explain it to us are people who never wrote the Bible. So it's just guesses. But the fancy word for it, if you're interested in such a thing, is verbal plenary inspiration. And basically what it means is the Holy Spirit guides your thoughts and your ideas and then your personality and your intellect takes over and expresses those things. So the Holy Spirit's gonna present an idea to Paul and he's gonna write it out and it's gonna look a lot different than when James writes something out or when David writes something out or when Solomon writes something out. It's almost like if you were to go to the field next to the church. Now, a lot of you haven't been here in so long that you've forgotten that there's a field over there, but there is. It'd be like going to that field and telling you to take a lap once in an SUV and once in a sports car. The journey is going to be the same. The lap's going to be the same, but the experience in that lap is going to be different based, and that lap is going to be different based on the car that you took. It's going to feel different in the SUV. It's going to get done in a different amount of time. It's going to feel different in the sports car. It's the same way with translation and or with inspiration. God speaks to one person, and the way that that person writes it down is going to be different than the way that this person writes it down. But the path and the impact and the point are the same. So in that way, God breathed Scripture into these authors by directing their thoughts and directing their hearts and their heads to the ideas that he wanted them to write down. So it's not unless a book is inspired, is harmonious, is accepted, and is apostolic do we include it in the New Testament. That's how we got our Bible. And the last question I want to address today is how do we know we can trust it? And this is an important question. How do we know that this book that I hold in my hands is the same book, that these 39 books are the exact same as they were when they got approved by the Sanhedrin in 250 BC? How do I know that when I quote Genesis, it's the same Genesis that Jesus is quoting? How do I know that when I read the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew 2,000 years later, that those are the actual words that Jesus spoke? How do I know that the letter that Paul wrote to Romans has been preserved enough over the years so that when I open up Romans 1, 19 through 20 and read to you what Paul said, that it's the same thing the church in the first century was hearing? How do we know that we can trust this book? It's an important question. I would think that there's really three main factors that help us understand how we can trust the Bible. The three biggest reasons we can trust the Bible we hold in our hands are preservation, consistency, and evidence. The three biggest reasons that I know we can trust this are preservation, consistency, and evidence. Here's what I mean. You guys may not know this. I find this fascinating. If you don't find this fascinating, I'm sorry. We're talking about Sabbath next week, and I'm real excited for it. But the preservation of Scripture, to me, is so crucial and interesting and vital that it's worth understanding how it happened. You may remember from reading the New Testament that sometimes there's these two groups of people that are put together, the scribes and the Pharisees. What you may not know is that to be a scribe was actually a full-on religious profession. It was a whole profession to be a scribe. And the whole job of a scribe is not necessarily to write new things, but to simply copy things that existed. The only way to get more copies of the book of Genesis is for someone to sit down and painstakingly copy by hand the book of Genesis, right? Gutenberg hadn't been around yet. We didn't have copiers, so we had to write things down by hand. And the process of doing this was excruciatingly detailed. And again, these are men, it was just men in that day, who have dedicated their entire lives to copying Scripture. And they had very strict rules around how they did it. The foremost rule that I've always appreciated is if they made a single mistake at all, no scratching out and moving on and writing a little note about what you meant, any mistake in the manuscript, you destroyed the whole thing. You burned the whole thing. Now listen, we might think, oh gosh, that sounds tedious at first, but I don't think you understand how tedious. Think about if I asked you, if it was your job in 2021 to hand copy the book of Genesis to perfection. Take the book of Genesis. It's about 50 chapters. I want you to write it out word for word. I want you to look at it in your Bible and I want you to write it down. You have to write it down in such a way that it's going to be legible and easy to read in a hundred years. There can't be anybody a hundred years from now that can't tell if that's a G or a C or an E or an F. It needs to be clear and legible. And if there's a single mistake at all, if you put a comma in the wrong part, if you put the quotations outside the period and they should be inside the period, whatever you do, if there's any mistakes, you have to destroy it and start over. Can you imagine how frustrating it would be to nail 43 chapters and in the 44th chapter you write a T instead of an S and you have to destroy the whole thing? That's what they would do. That's how serious they were about this work. Whenever they would approach the word Yahweh, they would stop and get up from their desk and put their pen down and go and wash their hands and pray a prayer and make sure they were ceremonially clean before they would write it down. When they would finish a document to check it, they knew exactly how many words were in the book. If we're using Genesis, they knew exactly how many words were in Genesis. So they'd finish it. It's perfect. It's two years of effort. And then they would start the counting. And they knew how many words had to be in their manuscript and how many words were in the original one. They knew that. And if it was wrong, if the count was off by one word, no matter what, you destroy those years of effort and you start over. They knew the middle word. If there's 50,000 words, they knew the 25,000th word. And they would count to it. And then in the new manuscript, they would count back to it. And if the middle word didn't match up, they would destroy the copy as imperfect. And it seems tedious, and maybe it seems over the top, but here's the thing. It worked. And we get affirmations every so often of just how well it worked. I won't chase this rabbit hole too much because it gets into the weeds, but suffice it to say that in terms of manuscripts, the older ones you can find, the better off you are. The older you can find it, the closer to the original it is, right? If you find some manuscripts that are 1,000 years old, that means that things were written 1,000 years before that. They're a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy, right? But if you can find something that's 1,800 years old, so the original was only written 200 years before that, well, now it's a copy of a copy. So the older it is, the more accurate it is. And there have been multiple times in the Christian world where we have translated our Bibles based on the oldest manuscripts that we could find and translated them all out and had them and they've been published and on the shelves for us to pick up and read. And then something will happen, like what happened with the Dead Sea Scrolls, I believe in the 1930s. And they'll find these scrolls that predate the ones that we've already found. They're actually older than the oldest ones that we have. And so then they frantically check, oh my gosh, these ones that we have, are they accurate to the older ones? And what they found out is that within 99.9%, they're accurate. That the newer ones we have are accurate to the old ones that we find every couple of years. Which means that this preservation, over time, it worked. It's accurate. The words that we read here are the very ones that were written by Paul, are the very things that were said by Jesus, are the very words of David that were quoted by Matthew. The words that we read are the ones that are written. This has been proven over and over again. We can also trust the Bible because of its consistency, because of how unified its message is. I've told you already that it was written by over 40 authors over the span of 1,400 years, over three continents, with three languages. And yet, there is not a single irreconcilable difference between any of the books or any of the words. And yet, it is entirely consistent with itself. It was written over that great span of time, yet not a single one of those authors introduced an idea that can't be supported by another author or that goes against what one of the other authors said. How can this be possible unless there is one author overseeing the writing of all of it? How can it be possible that all these men over all these cultures with all these languages and all these years can come together and produce one sound document that has no inconsistencies unless there's been one person orchestrating the writing of it all. And there are people who have dedicated their lives to tearing this book down. There are people who have dedicated their adult lives to finding imperfections in the text, to finding contradictions here that don't exist. There are emperors who have tried to burn it. There are societies who have tried to get rid of it. But the Bible stands the test of time. It's still here. It's still trustworthy. It's still the things that Jesus said back when he said them. And because of its consistency, we know that we can trust it. Finally, there's evidence. I won't get too far in the weeds on this, but do you know that the Bible, hundreds of years before it ever existed, I think Daniel is the one who primarily does this. Do you know the Bible predicts Alexander the Great and the Grecian Empire? And that the Bible predicts the Roman Empire? You know, we find artifacts all the time that show us that the stories in the Bible are true. I've been over to Israel and they take you from Jerusalem down this road through the valley of the shadow of death to get to this little town called Jericho. And if you know your old Bible, your old Bible, your Old Testament well, you'll know that Joshua marched around the walls of Jericho seven times and then the walls fell. And if you go to Jericho today and you look at where they've excavated the wall and you can see the layers of it all the way down to the very bottom, that when you get close to the bottom down there, that there is a layer about this thick of ash and char. I've seen it with my own eyes from the time Jericho was burned to the ground, just like it says in the book of Joshua. In the 60s, a mathematician put this experiment together, and I've always found it to be really interesting. It's not an experiment, it's just an illustration of the prophecies in the Old Testament. If you take all the prophecies in the Old Testament that are about the Messiah, that by his stripes he will be healed, that he will be born of a virgin, that he'll be from both Nazareth and Bethlehem, that he'll be from the line of David. If you take all of the prophecies that are made about Jesus in the Old Testament, that are made about this messianic figure in the Old Testament, and you try to have one life that could possibly fulfill all of those prophecies, that the statistical probability of that, of one person fulfilling all of the prophecies that Jesus fulfilled, is the same as covering the state of Texas a foot deep, it's either a foot deep or three feet deep, in silver dollars. You paint one of those silver dollars red and you just drop it in there with the rest of them. Then you get on a plane, you fly over Texas, you parachute down, you land on the coins, you bend down and you pick up the red one. There's the same chances of you doing that as there is of anyone ever living a life that fulfills all the prophecies that Jesus fulfilled. And yet, he lived it. Jesus bears out the truth of Scripture. We see in Jesus' life enough evidence to know that everything around that is true. So I think, and I've come to a place where I believe we can trust Scripture because we can trust the preservation of it, we can trust the consistency of it, and we can trust the evidence that bears out from it. Now, I'll tell you this, for the extra nerdy ones, I actually have a whole class that I developed that I did a lifetime ago in apologetics, and I have about 12 pages of notes. I only shared with you guys like four pages of notes this morning. If you want more on this stuff, if you want to go more in depth, let me know and I'll email that to you. If you have other questions, let me know and I will respond to those. But it feels appropriate to close out this sermon by offering you a little challenge. We've looked at the Bible. We've asked the questions. How can we trust it? Why is it such a big deal? It's the inspired word of God. It's a special revelation to us. We got it through a trustworthy series of events that have rendered it whole, and now we can trust it because of all the reasons that I just went through. And so it seems appropriate to issue this challenge to you in 2021. You may already be a couple days behind and that's all right, but here's the thing. Here's your challenge. I want to challenge you guys to read more of the Bible this year than you ever have before. That's the challenge. That's the challenge for us at Grace. I'm going to engage in that. I want to challenge you to read more of the Bible this year than you ever have before in a single year. That's going to mean different things for different people. You may be thinking to yourself, well, that's great. I've never read the Bible before. All right, well, then it's a low bar for you. Enjoy your success. I hope that it would continue. Set the bar higher for future years, but take a step. A lot of us are the kind of people who have sat down a bunch of times determined to read the Bible. Let this be the time that it sticks. Find a good pace that you can go at, a good rhythm for yourself. Let the Bible read itself to you. On the Bible app, you can have it read itself to you in your car or on your walk. I'm going to read through the Bible this year. I started last year and then I fell off the wagon. I'm going to make it my goal to read through the Bible this year. I'm just going to listen to the Bible this year in addition to what I'm reading on a regular basis. And it's worth stating that the Bible was actually written to be read aloud. So listening to it is a really good way to consume Scripture. If you're one who reads the Bible regularly, step it up. Let's let 2021 be the year that we read more of the Bible than we ever have. That's my challenge to you. All right, next week I'm going to come back and we're going to talk about this idea of Sabbath. What is it and why is it so important? But for now, I'm going to pray and we're going to close out the service with one more song. Pray with me. Father, we love you. Thank you so much for your word. Thank you that we can trust it. Thank you that we can build our lives on it. Thank you that it will never let us down. Thank you that it has stood the test of time and is trustworthy. Father, if we have any other questions about your word, give us the courage and the tenacity to seek those out. Give us the humility to accept what is true. Give us the clarity to reject what isn't. God, I pray once again that as we go throughout our weeks this week, that we would be people and instruments of peace for you in this country and a time when we need it so badly. God, thank you for your word. Make us students of it. Develop in us a hunger for it. In Jesus' name, amen.

It's good to get to be back with you in the saddle preaching live. I've been excited for this morning and I'm excited for this series. This series, Things You Should Know, I think that's what we're calling it. Yeah, it's right there on the screen next to me. Things You Should Know. I forgot what we named it back in the beginning of December, but I haven't forgotten what it's about. And it's based on this idea that there's things that we should all know as Christians, or that we at least nod along with as Christians, that we pretend that we know, that we may not actually know, right? Like there's a kind of a Christianese and another language that's spoken around churches. And I think sometimes we just kind of nod along with that because we don't want to look or feel dumb. And I know how it goes. I mean, you join a small group for the first time. You haven't really been involved in church in a while or just kind of cursory involvement. And then you show up in a small group and people start talking about stuff. And you might not know what they're talking about, but you don't want to feel dumb or silly or uninformed or make yourself look bad. So you don't say anything. And then you've been there so long that now I have to be one of the people that knows these things too. And so we just kind of nod along when people talk about grace and mercy or throw out Bible words like sanctification, and we just kind of act like we know what they're talking about when sometimes we really don't. And one of the things that I want you to know is that it's okay not to know stuff. It's actually really great to ask questions. One of my favorite things to do is to have my men's Bible study and have people in that study who are not very familiar with the text that we're covering because the questions that they ask are the best, but you have to be brave to ask questions because when you ask a question, you're admitting that I don't know this thing. And there's some stuff in the church that I think we nod along with, that we act like we know, when maybe we don't. And we want to be brave for you this month and ask those questions for you this month. And so this morning, the title of the sermon is simply the Bible. Questions that we might have about the Bible. I'm going to look at three questions that I think everybody has about Scripture that we might not know the answers to, but that I think every Christian should know. And now I'll warn you up front, this is not a normal sermon. This is far more informative. It's informational, this sermon is. The things that I'm going to share with you this morning are things that I wasn't exposed to until I was in Bible college, taking theology classes, or in grad school, in seminary, taking more theology classes. And there's a lot more to it than what we're going to cover this morning, but I wanted to take a morning, one Sunday, and address with you some common questions about the Bible, because again, I think every believer should know the answers to these questions. So I'll say up front, for some of you, you're going to love this. You're going to love it. Your notebook is out. You're ready. You're going to write these things down, and if you're a note taker, there's going to be a lot to write down. So get ready. Get your best possible pen. Some of you might not love this. This might not be your thing. And just to know, just for you to know, when I was praying before the sermon, my final words to God were, Father, make this helpful. And if it's not helpful, make it quick. Okay, so I'm with you. There's a lot of information, but I think you need to know this stuff, and I hope that you'll be interested in it. And actually, I want to know what you learned this morning. If I tell you something that you didn't know before, email me and tell me what you learned and tell me what you enjoyed. If there's other questions that you've always wanted to ask, email me and ask those questions. You can even tell me that I heard my friend ask this, so you don't even have to throw yourself under the bus. But get those questions to me. Get your responses to me. I want us to interact with the things we're talking about in this series. But I said I was going to give you three questions about the Bible that I think we should all be able to answer. And the first one is this. Why is the Bible a big deal? Why is the Bible such a big deal? Why do we make such a fuss about it? And it may seem like I'm going too simple on this, but I think it's an important question. Think about it. Think about where we place the Bible in our lives. I tell you guys all the time that there's no greater habit that anyone in their life could have than to read the Bible every day, than to spend time with God through prayer and in His Word every day. So we make a big deal out of the Bible. We hold the Bible up as the foremost authority in our lives. We believe and we teach at Grace that if you're walking with God, that you won't allow anything into your life until it's filtered through Scripture. That the biggest authority in your life of whether something is right or wrong or good or bad or from God or not is to go to Scripture and see what does it say. The entire church is built around the teachings of the Bible. Wars have been fought over it. People have died to preserve it. So it's worth asking the question, why is the Bible such a big deal? Well, the short answer is this. The Bible is a big deal because it's God's special revelation to us. We make such a fuss out of the Bible. The Bible is a big deal because it is God's special revelation to us. Now, here's what I mean. That word revelation, we're already getting into some technical Christian terms. That's not really a Christian term. That just means something that's revealed. It's the same root word there. It just means to reveal something. And so what we understand about ourselves and what you understand about you, whether you've ever thought about this or not, is that people can only know about you what you choose to reveal to them, right? If you meet somebody at a dinner party, you know you're never going to talk to them again. You can make up a totally false identity. They'll never know. You can tell them that you used to be a professional ball player. They won't know the difference. They'll Google you later. You won't exist, and it's fine. You'll never have that interaction again. But they only know about you what you choose to reveal about yourself. So when you meet someone in passing, it's just a cursory glance. They only know you by the way that you dress, by what you reveal, by how you present yourself to the world. The more someone is around you, the more they see you react and interact and respond, the more they learn about you and what's there. But again, people can only know about you what you choose to reveal to them about yourself, right? Well, the same is true of God. We can only know about God what he chooses to reveal about himself. And with him, it's in particular no more and no less. So with God, if we understand revelation to be what God chooses to reveal to us about himself, that we would get to know God the same way we would get to know anybody in our life, the same way other people would get to know us, then we have to understand that with God, there's two kinds of revelation. There's general revelation and special revelation. The way that I think about those is this. General revelation makes us aware of the presence of God, and special revelation gives us the details of that presence. General revelation is stuff that everybody can see. And Romans 1 actually sums up general revelation like this. This is what Paul says in Romans 1, looking at verse 19. He says, So he says, listen, God wrote himself in nature. Anybody who looks outward at nature, at the trees, at the seasons, at the rhythms of nature, the way the earth rotates around the sun, at how huge the universe is, at how small it can be, at the miracle of birth, at just the essence of life. As you look at nature, it points to a creator God. And as you look inward on what is written in your nature, it points to a creator God. Our moral compass, the fact that every civilization ever has prized bravery and bemoaned cowardice, has said that telling the truth is good and that being deceptive is bad. That moral code was written on our hearts by God. On our hearts, we have a longing for our Creator. So whether we look without or within, when we look at nature, God has written himself in nature. That is his general revelation, making all of us aware of his existence. But his special revelation, where he gives us the details of that existence, that's in the Bible. And here's what's incredible about that. What if we didn't have the Bible? What if we didn't know the details of this God that exists? Then he would just be to us this being that existed distant and cold, who had the authority to punish us, to start our life and to take our life, to manipulate circumstances to make us joyful or to make us miserable. It would be a God that we would hope to try to appease, but we wouldn't really know who he was. It would be a God that would inevitably incur fear and myth. But in God's goodness, he gave us the Bible. And it gives us the details of his existence. It's in his words that we find out, oh goodness, this God that created me loves me. This God that created me actually only created me so that I could spend eternity with him. That's how much he wants to be with me. This God who created me sent his son to die for me. This God who created me is love. He is goodness. He is gracious. He is merciful. This book tells us all we need to know about the God who created us. It is God's special revelation of himself to us. This is why we hold it in such high esteem. Because we believe that in these pages are the very words of God. And that this is, he could have chosen to reveal himself any way he wanted to, but what he chose to do is to reveal himself in the pages of Scripture. And in here we find him and who he is. It's an invitation to know our God better. That's why we make such a big deal out of the Bible. Now, the next question. And this one is important. I hope that some of you guys have asked this. I hope that some of you know some of the answers to this. But I think it's an important question. How did we even get the Bible? How did we get the Bible? How is it that I can go to the store and buy this, and these are the books that God wants in here, and these are the words that God wants in here, and these are the things that were written down however many years ago. How do we even get this? Because I don't know if you know this about the Bible, but the Bible is composed of an Old Testament and a New Testament. It totals 66 books. There's 39 in the Old Testament and 27 in the New Testament. And you may or may not know, I mean, you probably know that there's been a lot of people who have contributed to writing the Bible, but there's actually over 40 authors that contribute to the Bible. Did you know that the Bible was written over the span of about 1,400 years across three different continents, Africa and Asia and Europe? And that it was written actually in three different languages, Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic. And through all of that time, through the span of 1,400 years, through the minds of over 40 authors on three continents and however many different cultures that was, and in three different languages, God inspired this written word. So how did it get to us? It's a fair question. When we talk about how it got to us, we can really talk about it in the Old and the New Testament. The Old Testament is pretty easy. In ancient Israel, there was a ruling body called the Sanhedrin. That was a lot like our Senate. It was made up of different parties. The two most famous parties in the Sanhedrin were the Pharisees and the Sadducees. We've probably heard of those before, at least the Pharisees, I would think. And then there was other little parties that weren't as influential, but were there, the Essenes and the Zealots. You can think of those as like the modern day libertarians. I know that my friend Tom Sartorius will appreciate that very much. But the Sanhedrin was made up of different parties, and those parties ruled Israel. It was a religious rule, not too different from what we see in Muslim countries today. And the Sanhedrin got together somewhere around 250 BC, or maybe a little bit after, and one of the things that they affirmed was that the holy scriptures they had were the Holy Scriptures that would serve as the Old Testament. To them, it was 24 books that they called the Tanakh. To us, it's 39 books that we call the Old Testament, but they're the exact same. They grouped up a bunch of different books that we have separated out together, like Kings and Chronicles was one book, and now it's four. So they would group things together like that, but it's the same. Our 39 books are the same 24 books that they affirmed in 250 BC. And the Sanhedrin looked around and voted and they said, this is it. These are the Holy Scriptures. This is the Tanakh, the law and the prophets. In the New Testament, when we hear Jesus or one of the other writers refer to the law and the prophets, he's referring to the Old Testament, to the Tanakh. And that Old Testament has not been changed since 250 BC when they affirmed it. And the last book was Malachi, and it was written around 400 BC. So it had already existed as one big volume of works for at least 150 years before they ever addressed it. It hasn't changed since 400 BC, and it's not going to change in the future. The Old Testament is done, and that's how we got it. Now, the New Testament is interesting too, because at the time of Christ, there was a lot of writings. There's a lot of people writing a lot of different things. And after Christ left the scene, there was one universal church. We call it the Catholic Church. And the Catholic Church was structured. They say that there was a pope in the line of succession of Peter, that there was the next guy who was in charge of the church, and the next guy after that. And then there's bishops all that fan out depending on where the church is based on geography. And every now and again, they would have what was called councils. And all the leaders from all the different churches and parishes, I suppose, and all the different areas would get together in this one city and they would debate theological ideas. And they would decide, this is something that the whole church believes. This is something that we are going to cast aside. An example of this is the Council of Nicaea, where they decided without a doubt that Christ is God. Before that, there was some disagreement in the church. Some people thought that Christ was simply a man, that he was a prophet, like the Islam religion claims that he is. Other people say, no, he is deity. He is God incarnate in the flesh. So they got together, they talked about it, they voted on it, and they decided moving forward, the Christian church believes that Jesus is the Son of God. It's a really pivotal council, and we still affirm that. But what we find is that towards about 393 and 398, there was two councils, the Council of Hippo and the Council of Carthage, where those people got together and they voted on what books were going to be included in the New Testament. This is called the canonization of Scripture, the complete, done, codified work. And they voted on which books would be included. And what's important to point out here is it wasn't like they all brought 60 books to the table and then they slowly whittled it down to these 27. They voted on the 27 books that we commonly accept as Scripture that were commonly accepted then. All they did is agree on what was essentially already agreed upon. If you don't believe me, I actually have a quote this morning. I don't do this a lot, okay? I don't belabor things like this a lot because I think they're boring and no one cares. But I think this morning it's important. I've got a quote for you by a guy named F.F. Bruce. You know he's important because he doesn't use a name. It's just his initials. And in the church world, that means you're super smart and also pretentious. Get over yourself, F.F. But F.F. Bruce said this about the councils, and I think it's great. Read with me here. That's a big, long, fancy way of saying they didn't introduce any new ideas. All they did is put a rubber stamp on, yep, these are the books that we hold as Holy Scripture. And it's the same 27 books that we have today. They affirmed 27 books in the New Testament. We have those same 27 books now. So that's how we got the Old Testament and the New Testament. You may want to know, another question you should ask is, how did they determine which books were allowed in? What was the criteria? Well, for a book to be included in the canon, it had to be apostolic, harmonious, accepted, and inspired. Again, for a book to be included in the New Testament, it had to meet these requirements. It had to be apostolic, had to be harmonious, had to be commonly accepted, and it had to be inspired. And when I say apostolic, what I mean is this. An apostle is someone who has an eyewitness account of Christ. So for a book to be apostolic, it has to be written by someone who has seen Jesus in the flesh, which is a really easy way to say that the canon is closed. Can God appear to somebody and speak to someone and ask them to write something down on his behalf? Sure he could if he wanted to, but he doesn't do that anymore in a way that's going to be included in Scripture. We're not going to add to the Bible because one of the ways to get included in the New Testament is to be someone who's an eyewitness of Christ. And since all those people are dead, we're not accepting any more entries in the Bible. It has to be harmonious, meaning it has to agree with other books that are accepted in Scripture. It can't disagree with the Tanakh. It can't disagree with the teachings in the Old Testament. It can't disagree with the teachings and the quotes of Jesus. The Gospels were the first New Testament books written, so it can't disagree with any of those. It has to be in harmony with the rest of the books included. It's got to be accepted, meaning there's no surprises at these councils. Nobody brought this thing that was written down by somebody else and said, hey, would you consider this? The books that were agreed upon in Hippo and in Carthage were books that everybody was already familiar with, that those guys had taught their congregations out of many, many times. They were commonly accepted books. And then they had to be inspired. And really, the first three things are ways to determine if they felt like it was inspired by God. And this is an important word. We talk about the Bible being inspired. But I don't know how often we talk about what that means. Did God take over the minds of these men and these women and they wrote it down verbatim as the Holy Spirit spoke it to them? Was God basically dictating to them what the Bible was supposed to say? The way that we think about inspiration and how it works, and I hold this with a loose hand because it's hard to be certain how inspiration works. The only people who can explain it to us are people who never wrote the Bible. So it's just guesses. But the fancy word for it, if you're interested in such a thing, is verbal plenary inspiration. And basically what it means is the Holy Spirit guides your thoughts and your ideas and then your personality and your intellect takes over and expresses those things. So the Holy Spirit's gonna present an idea to Paul and he's gonna write it out and it's gonna look a lot different than when James writes something out or when David writes something out or when Solomon writes something out. It's almost like if you were to go to the field next to the church. Now, a lot of you haven't been here in so long that you've forgotten that there's a field over there, but there is. It'd be like going to that field and telling you to take a lap once in an SUV and once in a sports car. The journey is going to be the same. The lap's going to be the same, but the experience in that lap is going to be different based, and that lap is going to be different based on the car that you took. It's going to feel different in the SUV. It's going to get done in a different amount of time. It's going to feel different in the sports car. It's the same way with translation and or with inspiration. God speaks to one person, and the way that that person writes it down is going to be different than the way that this person writes it down. But the path and the impact and the point are the same. So in that way, God breathed Scripture into these authors by directing their thoughts and directing their hearts and their heads to the ideas that he wanted them to write down. So it's not unless a book is inspired, is harmonious, is accepted, and is apostolic do we include it in the New Testament. That's how we got our Bible. And the last question I want to address today is how do we know we can trust it? And this is an important question. How do we know that this book that I hold in my hands is the same book, that these 39 books are the exact same as they were when they got approved by the Sanhedrin in 250 BC? How do I know that when I quote Genesis, it's the same Genesis that Jesus is quoting? How do I know that when I read the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew 2,000 years later, that those are the actual words that Jesus spoke? How do I know that the letter that Paul wrote to Romans has been preserved enough over the years so that when I open up Romans 1, 19 through 20 and read to you what Paul said, that it's the same thing the church in the first century was hearing? How do we know that we can trust this book? It's an important question. I would think that there's really three main factors that help us understand how we can trust the Bible. The three biggest reasons we can trust the Bible we hold in our hands are preservation, consistency, and evidence. The three biggest reasons that I know we can trust this are preservation, consistency, and evidence. Here's what I mean. You guys may not know this. I find this fascinating. If you don't find this fascinating, I'm sorry. We're talking about Sabbath next week, and I'm real excited for it. But the preservation of Scripture, to me, is so crucial and interesting and vital that it's worth understanding how it happened. You may remember from reading the New Testament that sometimes there's these two groups of people that are put together, the scribes and the Pharisees. What you may not know is that to be a scribe was actually a full-on religious profession. It was a whole profession to be a scribe. And the whole job of a scribe is not necessarily to write new things, but to simply copy things that existed. The only way to get more copies of the book of Genesis is for someone to sit down and painstakingly copy by hand the book of Genesis, right? Gutenberg hadn't been around yet. We didn't have copiers, so we had to write things down by hand. And the process of doing this was excruciatingly detailed. And again, these are men, it was just men in that day, who have dedicated their entire lives to copying Scripture. And they had very strict rules around how they did it. The foremost rule that I've always appreciated is if they made a single mistake at all, no scratching out and moving on and writing a little note about what you meant, any mistake in the manuscript, you destroyed the whole thing. You burned the whole thing. Now listen, we might think, oh gosh, that sounds tedious at first, but I don't think you understand how tedious. Think about if I asked you, if it was your job in 2021 to hand copy the book of Genesis to perfection. Take the book of Genesis. It's about 50 chapters. I want you to write it out word for word. I want you to look at it in your Bible and I want you to write it down. You have to write it down in such a way that it's going to be legible and easy to read in a hundred years. There can't be anybody a hundred years from now that can't tell if that's a G or a C or an E or an F. It needs to be clear and legible. And if there's a single mistake at all, if you put a comma in the wrong part, if you put the quotations outside the period and they should be inside the period, whatever you do, if there's any mistakes, you have to destroy it and start over. Can you imagine how frustrating it would be to nail 43 chapters and in the 44th chapter you write a T instead of an S and you have to destroy the whole thing? That's what they would do. That's how serious they were about this work. Whenever they would approach the word Yahweh, they would stop and get up from their desk and put their pen down and go and wash their hands and pray a prayer and make sure they were ceremonially clean before they would write it down. When they would finish a document to check it, they knew exactly how many words were in the book. If we're using Genesis, they knew exactly how many words were in Genesis. So they'd finish it. It's perfect. It's two years of effort. And then they would start the counting. And they knew how many words had to be in their manuscript and how many words were in the original one. They knew that. And if it was wrong, if the count was off by one word, no matter what, you destroy those years of effort and you start over. They knew the middle word. If there's 50,000 words, they knew the 25,000th word. And they would count to it. And then in the new manuscript, they would count back to it. And if the middle word didn't match up, they would destroy the copy as imperfect. And it seems tedious, and maybe it seems over the top, but here's the thing. It worked. And we get affirmations every so often of just how well it worked. I won't chase this rabbit hole too much because it gets into the weeds, but suffice it to say that in terms of manuscripts, the older ones you can find, the better off you are. The older you can find it, the closer to the original it is, right? If you find some manuscripts that are 1,000 years old, that means that things were written 1,000 years before that. They're a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy, right? But if you can find something that's 1,800 years old, so the original was only written 200 years before that, well, now it's a copy of a copy. So the older it is, the more accurate it is. And there have been multiple times in the Christian world where we have translated our Bibles based on the oldest manuscripts that we could find and translated them all out and had them and they've been published and on the shelves for us to pick up and read. And then something will happen, like what happened with the Dead Sea Scrolls, I believe in the 1930s. And they'll find these scrolls that predate the ones that we've already found. They're actually older than the oldest ones that we have. And so then they frantically check, oh my gosh, these ones that we have, are they accurate to the older ones? And what they found out is that within 99.9%, they're accurate. That the newer ones we have are accurate to the old ones that we find every couple of years. Which means that this preservation, over time, it worked. It's accurate. The words that we read here are the very ones that were written by Paul, are the very things that were said by Jesus, are the very words of David that were quoted by Matthew. The words that we read are the ones that are written. This has been proven over and over again. We can also trust the Bible because of its consistency, because of how unified its message is. I've told you already that it was written by over 40 authors over the span of 1,400 years, over three continents, with three languages. And yet, there is not a single irreconcilable difference between any of the books or any of the words. And yet, it is entirely consistent with itself. It was written over that great span of time, yet not a single one of those authors introduced an idea that can't be supported by another author or that goes against what one of the other authors said. How can this be possible unless there is one author overseeing the writing of all of it? How can it be possible that all these men over all these cultures with all these languages and all these years can come together and produce one sound document that has no inconsistencies unless there's been one person orchestrating the writing of it all. And there are people who have dedicated their lives to tearing this book down. There are people who have dedicated their adult lives to finding imperfections in the text, to finding contradictions here that don't exist. There are emperors who have tried to burn it. There are societies who have tried to get rid of it. But the Bible stands the test of time. It's still here. It's still trustworthy. It's still the things that Jesus said back when he said them. And because of its consistency, we know that we can trust it. Finally, there's evidence. I won't get too far in the weeds on this, but do you know that the Bible, hundreds of years before it ever existed, I think Daniel is the one who primarily does this. Do you know the Bible predicts Alexander the Great and the Grecian Empire? And that the Bible predicts the Roman Empire? You know, we find artifacts all the time that show us that the stories in the Bible are true. I've been over to Israel and they take you from Jerusalem down this road through the valley of the shadow of death to get to this little town called Jericho. And if you know your old Bible, your old Bible, your Old Testament well, you'll know that Joshua marched around the walls of Jericho seven times and then the walls fell. And if you go to Jericho today and you look at where they've excavated the wall and you can see the layers of it all the way down to the very bottom, that when you get close to the bottom down there, that there is a layer about this thick of ash and char. I've seen it with my own eyes from the time Jericho was burned to the ground, just like it says in the book of Joshua. In the 60s, a mathematician put this experiment together, and I've always found it to be really interesting. It's not an experiment, it's just an illustration of the prophecies in the Old Testament. If you take all the prophecies in the Old Testament that are about the Messiah, that by his stripes he will be healed, that he will be born of a virgin, that he'll be from both Nazareth and Bethlehem, that he'll be from the line of David. If you take all of the prophecies that are made about Jesus in the Old Testament, that are made about this messianic figure in the Old Testament, and you try to have one life that could possibly fulfill all of those prophecies, that the statistical probability of that, of one person fulfilling all of the prophecies that Jesus fulfilled, is the same as covering the state of Texas a foot deep, it's either a foot deep or three feet deep, in silver dollars. You paint one of those silver dollars red and you just drop it in there with the rest of them. Then you get on a plane, you fly over Texas, you parachute down, you land on the coins, you bend down and you pick up the red one. There's the same chances of you doing that as there is of anyone ever living a life that fulfills all the prophecies that Jesus fulfilled. And yet, he lived it. Jesus bears out the truth of Scripture. We see in Jesus' life enough evidence to know that everything around that is true. So I think, and I've come to a place where I believe we can trust Scripture because we can trust the preservation of it, we can trust the consistency of it, and we can trust the evidence that bears out from it. Now, I'll tell you this, for the extra nerdy ones, I actually have a whole class that I developed that I did a lifetime ago in apologetics, and I have about 12 pages of notes. I only shared with you guys like four pages of notes this morning. If you want more on this stuff, if you want to go more in depth, let me know and I'll email that to you. If you have other questions, let me know and I will respond to those. But it feels appropriate to close out this sermon by offering you a little challenge. We've looked at the Bible. We've asked the questions. How can we trust it? Why is it such a big deal? It's the inspired word of God. It's a special revelation to us. We got it through a trustworthy series of events that have rendered it whole, and now we can trust it because of all the reasons that I just went through. And so it seems appropriate to issue this challenge to you in 2021. You may already be a couple days behind and that's all right, but here's the thing. Here's your challenge. I want to challenge you guys to read more of the Bible this year than you ever have before. That's the challenge. That's the challenge for us at Grace. I'm going to engage in that. I want to challenge you to read more of the Bible this year than you ever have before in a single year. That's going to mean different things for different people. You may be thinking to yourself, well, that's great. I've never read the Bible before. All right, well, then it's a low bar for you. Enjoy your success. I hope that it would continue. Set the bar higher for future years, but take a step. A lot of us are the kind of people who have sat down a bunch of times determined to read the Bible. Let this be the time that it sticks. Find a good pace that you can go at, a good rhythm for yourself. Let the Bible read itself to you. On the Bible app, you can have it read itself to you in your car or on your walk. I'm going to read through the Bible this year. I started last year and then I fell off the wagon. I'm going to make it my goal to read through the Bible this year. I'm just going to listen to the Bible this year in addition to what I'm reading on a regular basis. And it's worth stating that the Bible was actually written to be read aloud. So listening to it is a really good way to consume Scripture. If you're one who reads the Bible regularly, step it up. Let's let 2021 be the year that we read more of the Bible than we ever have. That's my challenge to you. All right, next week I'm going to come back and we're going to talk about this idea of Sabbath. What is it and why is it so important? But for now, I'm going to pray and we're going to close out the service with one more song. Pray with me. Father, we love you. Thank you so much for your word. Thank you that we can trust it. Thank you that we can build our lives on it. Thank you that it will never let us down. Thank you that it has stood the test of time and is trustworthy. Father, if we have any other questions about your word, give us the courage and the tenacity to seek those out. Give us the humility to accept what is true. Give us the clarity to reject what isn't. God, I pray once again that as we go throughout our weeks this week, that we would be people and instruments of peace for you in this country and a time when we need it so badly. God, thank you for your word. Make us students of it. Develop in us a hunger for it. In Jesus' name, amen.

It's good to get to be back with you in the saddle preaching live. I've been excited for this morning and I'm excited for this series. This series, Things You Should Know, I think that's what we're calling it. Yeah, it's right there on the screen next to me. Things You Should Know. I forgot what we named it back in the beginning of December, but I haven't forgotten what it's about. And it's based on this idea that there's things that we should all know as Christians, or that we at least nod along with as Christians, that we pretend that we know, that we may not actually know, right? Like there's a kind of a Christianese and another language that's spoken around churches. And I think sometimes we just kind of nod along with that because we don't want to look or feel dumb. And I know how it goes. I mean, you join a small group for the first time. You haven't really been involved in church in a while or just kind of cursory involvement. And then you show up in a small group and people start talking about stuff. And you might not know what they're talking about, but you don't want to feel dumb or silly or uninformed or make yourself look bad. So you don't say anything. And then you've been there so long that now I have to be one of the people that knows these things too. And so we just kind of nod along when people talk about grace and mercy or throw out Bible words like sanctification, and we just kind of act like we know what they're talking about when sometimes we really don't. And one of the things that I want you to know is that it's okay not to know stuff. It's actually really great to ask questions. One of my favorite things to do is to have my men's Bible study and have people in that study who are not very familiar with the text that we're covering because the questions that they ask are the best, but you have to be brave to ask questions because when you ask a question, you're admitting that I don't know this thing. And there's some stuff in the church that I think we nod along with, that we act like we know, when maybe we don't. And we want to be brave for you this month and ask those questions for you this month. And so this morning, the title of the sermon is simply the Bible. Questions that we might have about the Bible. I'm going to look at three questions that I think everybody has about Scripture that we might not know the answers to, but that I think every Christian should know. And now I'll warn you up front, this is not a normal sermon. This is far more informative. It's informational, this sermon is. The things that I'm going to share with you this morning are things that I wasn't exposed to until I was in Bible college, taking theology classes, or in grad school, in seminary, taking more theology classes. And there's a lot more to it than what we're going to cover this morning, but I wanted to take a morning, one Sunday, and address with you some common questions about the Bible, because again, I think every believer should know the answers to these questions. So I'll say up front, for some of you, you're going to love this. You're going to love it. Your notebook is out. You're ready. You're going to write these things down, and if you're a note taker, there's going to be a lot to write down. So get ready. Get your best possible pen. Some of you might not love this. This might not be your thing. And just to know, just for you to know, when I was praying before the sermon, my final words to God were, Father, make this helpful. And if it's not helpful, make it quick. Okay, so I'm with you. There's a lot of information, but I think you need to know this stuff, and I hope that you'll be interested in it. And actually, I want to know what you learned this morning. If I tell you something that you didn't know before, email me and tell me what you learned and tell me what you enjoyed. If there's other questions that you've always wanted to ask, email me and ask those questions. You can even tell me that I heard my friend ask this, so you don't even have to throw yourself under the bus. But get those questions to me. Get your responses to me. I want us to interact with the things we're talking about in this series. But I said I was going to give you three questions about the Bible that I think we should all be able to answer. And the first one is this. Why is the Bible a big deal? Why is the Bible such a big deal? Why do we make such a fuss about it? And it may seem like I'm going too simple on this, but I think it's an important question. Think about it. Think about where we place the Bible in our lives. I tell you guys all the time that there's no greater habit that anyone in their life could have than to read the Bible every day, than to spend time with God through prayer and in His Word every day. So we make a big deal out of the Bible. We hold the Bible up as the foremost authority in our lives. We believe and we teach at Grace that if you're walking with God, that you won't allow anything into your life until it's filtered through Scripture. That the biggest authority in your life of whether something is right or wrong or good or bad or from God or not is to go to Scripture and see what does it say. The entire church is built around the teachings of the Bible. Wars have been fought over it. People have died to preserve it. So it's worth asking the question, why is the Bible such a big deal? Well, the short answer is this. The Bible is a big deal because it's God's special revelation to us. We make such a fuss out of the Bible. The Bible is a big deal because it is God's special revelation to us. Now, here's what I mean. That word revelation, we're already getting into some technical Christian terms. That's not really a Christian term. That just means something that's revealed. It's the same root word there. It just means to reveal something. And so what we understand about ourselves and what you understand about you, whether you've ever thought about this or not, is that people can only know about you what you choose to reveal to them, right? If you meet somebody at a dinner party, you know you're never going to talk to them again. You can make up a totally false identity. They'll never know. You can tell them that you used to be a professional ball player. They won't know the difference. They'll Google you later. You won't exist, and it's fine. You'll never have that interaction again. But they only know about you what you choose to reveal about yourself. So when you meet someone in passing, it's just a cursory glance. They only know you by the way that you dress, by what you reveal, by how you present yourself to the world. The more someone is around you, the more they see you react and interact and respond, the more they learn about you and what's there. But again, people can only know about you what you choose to reveal to them about yourself, right? Well, the same is true of God. We can only know about God what he chooses to reveal about himself. And with him, it's in particular no more and no less. So with God, if we understand revelation to be what God chooses to reveal to us about himself, that we would get to know God the same way we would get to know anybody in our life, the same way other people would get to know us, then we have to understand that with God, there's two kinds of revelation. There's general revelation and special revelation. The way that I think about those is this. General revelation makes us aware of the presence of God, and special revelation gives us the details of that presence. General revelation is stuff that everybody can see. And Romans 1 actually sums up general revelation like this. This is what Paul says in Romans 1, looking at verse 19. He says, So he says, listen, God wrote himself in nature. Anybody who looks outward at nature, at the trees, at the seasons, at the rhythms of nature, the way the earth rotates around the sun, at how huge the universe is, at how small it can be, at the miracle of birth, at just the essence of life. As you look at nature, it points to a creator God. And as you look inward on what is written in your nature, it points to a creator God. Our moral compass, the fact that every civilization ever has prized bravery and bemoaned cowardice, has said that telling the truth is good and that being deceptive is bad. That moral code was written on our hearts by God. On our hearts, we have a longing for our Creator. So whether we look without or within, when we look at nature, God has written himself in nature. That is his general revelation, making all of us aware of his existence. But his special revelation, where he gives us the details of that existence, that's in the Bible. And here's what's incredible about that. What if we didn't have the Bible? What if we didn't know the details of this God that exists? Then he would just be to us this being that existed distant and cold, who had the authority to punish us, to start our life and to take our life, to manipulate circumstances to make us joyful or to make us miserable. It would be a God that we would hope to try to appease, but we wouldn't really know who he was. It would be a God that would inevitably incur fear and myth. But in God's goodness, he gave us the Bible. And it gives us the details of his existence. It's in his words that we find out, oh goodness, this God that created me loves me. This God that created me actually only created me so that I could spend eternity with him. That's how much he wants to be with me. This God who created me sent his son to die for me. This God who created me is love. He is goodness. He is gracious. He is merciful. This book tells us all we need to know about the God who created us. It is God's special revelation of himself to us. This is why we hold it in such high esteem. Because we believe that in these pages are the very words of God. And that this is, he could have chosen to reveal himself any way he wanted to, but what he chose to do is to reveal himself in the pages of Scripture. And in here we find him and who he is. It's an invitation to know our God better. That's why we make such a big deal out of the Bible. Now, the next question. And this one is important. I hope that some of you guys have asked this. I hope that some of you know some of the answers to this. But I think it's an important question. How did we even get the Bible? How did we get the Bible? How is it that I can go to the store and buy this, and these are the books that God wants in here, and these are the words that God wants in here, and these are the things that were written down however many years ago. How do we even get this? Because I don't know if you know this about the Bible, but the Bible is composed of an Old Testament and a New Testament. It totals 66 books. There's 39 in the Old Testament and 27 in the New Testament. And you may or may not know, I mean, you probably know that there's been a lot of people who have contributed to writing the Bible, but there's actually over 40 authors that contribute to the Bible. Did you know that the Bible was written over the span of about 1,400 years across three different continents, Africa and Asia and Europe? And that it was written actually in three different languages, Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic. And through all of that time, through the span of 1,400 years, through the minds of over 40 authors on three continents and however many different cultures that was, and in three different languages, God inspired this written word. So how did it get to us? It's a fair question. When we talk about how it got to us, we can really talk about it in the Old and the New Testament. The Old Testament is pretty easy. In ancient Israel, there was a ruling body called the Sanhedrin. That was a lot like our Senate. It was made up of different parties. The two most famous parties in the Sanhedrin were the Pharisees and the Sadducees. We've probably heard of those before, at least the Pharisees, I would think. And then there was other little parties that weren't as influential, but were there, the Essenes and the Zealots. You can think of those as like the modern day libertarians. I know that my friend Tom Sartorius will appreciate that very much. But the Sanhedrin was made up of different parties, and those parties ruled Israel. It was a religious rule, not too different from what we see in Muslim countries today. And the Sanhedrin got together somewhere around 250 BC, or maybe a little bit after, and one of the things that they affirmed was that the holy scriptures they had were the Holy Scriptures that would serve as the Old Testament. To them, it was 24 books that they called the Tanakh. To us, it's 39 books that we call the Old Testament, but they're the exact same. They grouped up a bunch of different books that we have separated out together, like Kings and Chronicles was one book, and now it's four. So they would group things together like that, but it's the same. Our 39 books are the same 24 books that they affirmed in 250 BC. And the Sanhedrin looked around and voted and they said, this is it. These are the Holy Scriptures. This is the Tanakh, the law and the prophets. In the New Testament, when we hear Jesus or one of the other writers refer to the law and the prophets, he's referring to the Old Testament, to the Tanakh. And that Old Testament has not been changed since 250 BC when they affirmed it. And the last book was Malachi, and it was written around 400 BC. So it had already existed as one big volume of works for at least 150 years before they ever addressed it. It hasn't changed since 400 BC, and it's not going to change in the future. The Old Testament is done, and that's how we got it. Now, the New Testament is interesting too, because at the time of Christ, there was a lot of writings. There's a lot of people writing a lot of different things. And after Christ left the scene, there was one universal church. We call it the Catholic Church. And the Catholic Church was structured. They say that there was a pope in the line of succession of Peter, that there was the next guy who was in charge of the church, and the next guy after that. And then there's bishops all that fan out depending on where the church is based on geography. And every now and again, they would have what was called councils. And all the leaders from all the different churches and parishes, I suppose, and all the different areas would get together in this one city and they would debate theological ideas. And they would decide, this is something that the whole church believes. This is something that we are going to cast aside. An example of this is the Council of Nicaea, where they decided without a doubt that Christ is God. Before that, there was some disagreement in the church. Some people thought that Christ was simply a man, that he was a prophet, like the Islam religion claims that he is. Other people say, no, he is deity. He is God incarnate in the flesh. So they got together, they talked about it, they voted on it, and they decided moving forward, the Christian church believes that Jesus is the Son of God. It's a really pivotal council, and we still affirm that. But what we find is that towards about 393 and 398, there was two councils, the Council of Hippo and the Council of Carthage, where those people got together and they voted on what books were going to be included in the New Testament. This is called the canonization of Scripture, the complete, done, codified work. And they voted on which books would be included. And what's important to point out here is it wasn't like they all brought 60 books to the table and then they slowly whittled it down to these 27. They voted on the 27 books that we commonly accept as Scripture that were commonly accepted then. All they did is agree on what was essentially already agreed upon. If you don't believe me, I actually have a quote this morning. I don't do this a lot, okay? I don't belabor things like this a lot because I think they're boring and no one cares. But I think this morning it's important. I've got a quote for you by a guy named F.F. Bruce. You know he's important because he doesn't use a name. It's just his initials. And in the church world, that means you're super smart and also pretentious. Get over yourself, F.F. But F.F. Bruce said this about the councils, and I think it's great. Read with me here. That's a big, long, fancy way of saying they didn't introduce any new ideas. All they did is put a rubber stamp on, yep, these are the books that we hold as Holy Scripture. And it's the same 27 books that we have today. They affirmed 27 books in the New Testament. We have those same 27 books now. So that's how we got the Old Testament and the New Testament. You may want to know, another question you should ask is, how did they determine which books were allowed in? What was the criteria? Well, for a book to be included in the canon, it had to be apostolic, harmonious, accepted, and inspired. Again, for a book to be included in the New Testament, it had to meet these requirements. It had to be apostolic, had to be harmonious, had to be commonly accepted, and it had to be inspired. And when I say apostolic, what I mean is this. An apostle is someone who has an eyewitness account of Christ. So for a book to be apostolic, it has to be written by someone who has seen Jesus in the flesh, which is a really easy way to say that the canon is closed. Can God appear to somebody and speak to someone and ask them to write something down on his behalf? Sure he could if he wanted to, but he doesn't do that anymore in a way that's going to be included in Scripture. We're not going to add to the Bible because one of the ways to get included in the New Testament is to be someone who's an eyewitness of Christ. And since all those people are dead, we're not accepting any more entries in the Bible. It has to be harmonious, meaning it has to agree with other books that are accepted in Scripture. It can't disagree with the Tanakh. It can't disagree with the teachings in the Old Testament. It can't disagree with the teachings and the quotes of Jesus. The Gospels were the first New Testament books written, so it can't disagree with any of those. It has to be in harmony with the rest of the books included. It's got to be accepted, meaning there's no surprises at these councils. Nobody brought this thing that was written down by somebody else and said, hey, would you consider this? The books that were agreed upon in Hippo and in Carthage were books that everybody was already familiar with, that those guys had taught their congregations out of many, many times. They were commonly accepted books. And then they had to be inspired. And really, the first three things are ways to determine if they felt like it was inspired by God. And this is an important word. We talk about the Bible being inspired. But I don't know how often we talk about what that means. Did God take over the minds of these men and these women and they wrote it down verbatim as the Holy Spirit spoke it to them? Was God basically dictating to them what the Bible was supposed to say? The way that we think about inspiration and how it works, and I hold this with a loose hand because it's hard to be certain how inspiration works. The only people who can explain it to us are people who never wrote the Bible. So it's just guesses. But the fancy word for it, if you're interested in such a thing, is verbal plenary inspiration. And basically what it means is the Holy Spirit guides your thoughts and your ideas and then your personality and your intellect takes over and expresses those things. So the Holy Spirit's gonna present an idea to Paul and he's gonna write it out and it's gonna look a lot different than when James writes something out or when David writes something out or when Solomon writes something out. It's almost like if you were to go to the field next to the church. Now, a lot of you haven't been here in so long that you've forgotten that there's a field over there, but there is. It'd be like going to that field and telling you to take a lap once in an SUV and once in a sports car. The journey is going to be the same. The lap's going to be the same, but the experience in that lap is going to be different based, and that lap is going to be different based on the car that you took. It's going to feel different in the SUV. It's going to get done in a different amount of time. It's going to feel different in the sports car. It's the same way with translation and or with inspiration. God speaks to one person, and the way that that person writes it down is going to be different than the way that this person writes it down. But the path and the impact and the point are the same. So in that way, God breathed Scripture into these authors by directing their thoughts and directing their hearts and their heads to the ideas that he wanted them to write down. So it's not unless a book is inspired, is harmonious, is accepted, and is apostolic do we include it in the New Testament. That's how we got our Bible. And the last question I want to address today is how do we know we can trust it? And this is an important question. How do we know that this book that I hold in my hands is the same book, that these 39 books are the exact same as they were when they got approved by the Sanhedrin in 250 BC? How do I know that when I quote Genesis, it's the same Genesis that Jesus is quoting? How do I know that when I read the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew 2,000 years later, that those are the actual words that Jesus spoke? How do I know that the letter that Paul wrote to Romans has been preserved enough over the years so that when I open up Romans 1, 19 through 20 and read to you what Paul said, that it's the same thing the church in the first century was hearing? How do we know that we can trust this book? It's an important question. I would think that there's really three main factors that help us understand how we can trust the Bible. The three biggest reasons we can trust the Bible we hold in our hands are preservation, consistency, and evidence. The three biggest reasons that I know we can trust this are preservation, consistency, and evidence. Here's what I mean. You guys may not know this. I find this fascinating. If you don't find this fascinating, I'm sorry. We're talking about Sabbath next week, and I'm real excited for it. But the preservation of Scripture, to me, is so crucial and interesting and vital that it's worth understanding how it happened. You may remember from reading the New Testament that sometimes there's these two groups of people that are put together, the scribes and the Pharisees. What you may not know is that to be a scribe was actually a full-on religious profession. It was a whole profession to be a scribe. And the whole job of a scribe is not necessarily to write new things, but to simply copy things that existed. The only way to get more copies of the book of Genesis is for someone to sit down and painstakingly copy by hand the book of Genesis, right? Gutenberg hadn't been around yet. We didn't have copiers, so we had to write things down by hand. And the process of doing this was excruciatingly detailed. And again, these are men, it was just men in that day, who have dedicated their entire lives to copying Scripture. And they had very strict rules around how they did it. The foremost rule that I've always appreciated is if they made a single mistake at all, no scratching out and moving on and writing a little note about what you meant, any mistake in the manuscript, you destroyed the whole thing. You burned the whole thing. Now listen, we might think, oh gosh, that sounds tedious at first, but I don't think you understand how tedious. Think about if I asked you, if it was your job in 2021 to hand copy the book of Genesis to perfection. Take the book of Genesis. It's about 50 chapters. I want you to write it out word for word. I want you to look at it in your Bible and I want you to write it down. You have to write it down in such a way that it's going to be legible and easy to read in a hundred years. There can't be anybody a hundred years from now that can't tell if that's a G or a C or an E or an F. It needs to be clear and legible. And if there's a single mistake at all, if you put a comma in the wrong part, if you put the quotations outside the period and they should be inside the period, whatever you do, if there's any mistakes, you have to destroy it and start over. Can you imagine how frustrating it would be to nail 43 chapters and in the 44th chapter you write a T instead of an S and you have to destroy the whole thing? That's what they would do. That's how serious they were about this work. Whenever they would approach the word Yahweh, they would stop and get up from their desk and put their pen down and go and wash their hands and pray a prayer and make sure they were ceremonially clean before they would write it down. When they would finish a document to check it, they knew exactly how many words were in the book. If we're using Genesis, they knew exactly how many words were in Genesis. So they'd finish it. It's perfect. It's two years of effort. And then they would start the counting. And they knew how many words had to be in their manuscript and how many words were in the original one. They knew that. And if it was wrong, if the count was off by one word, no matter what, you destroy those years of effort and you start over. They knew the middle word. If there's 50,000 words, they knew the 25,000th word. And they would count to it. And then in the new manuscript, they would count back to it. And if the middle word didn't match up, they would destroy the copy as imperfect. And it seems tedious, and maybe it seems over the top, but here's the thing. It worked. And we get affirmations every so often of just how well it worked. I won't chase this rabbit hole too much because it gets into the weeds, but suffice it to say that in terms of manuscripts, the older ones you can find, the better off you are. The older you can find it, the closer to the original it is, right? If you find some manuscripts that are 1,000 years old, that means that things were written 1,000 years before that. They're a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy, right? But if you can find something that's 1,800 years old, so the original was only written 200 years before that, well, now it's a copy of a copy. So the older it is, the more accurate it is. And there have been multiple times in the Christian world where we have translated our Bibles based on the oldest manuscripts that we could find and translated them all out and had them and they've been published and on the shelves for us to pick up and read. And then something will happen, like what happened with the Dead Sea Scrolls, I believe in the 1930s. And they'll find these scrolls that predate the ones that we've already found. They're actually older than the oldest ones that we have. And so then they frantically check, oh my gosh, these ones that we have, are they accurate to the older ones? And what they found out is that within 99.9%, they're accurate. That the newer ones we have are accurate to the old ones that we find every couple of years. Which means that this preservation, over time, it worked. It's accurate. The words that we read here are the very ones that were written by Paul, are the very things that were said by Jesus, are the very words of David that were quoted by Matthew. The words that we read are the ones that are written. This has been proven over and over again. We can also trust the Bible because of its consistency, because of how unified its message is. I've told you already that it was written by over 40 authors over the span of 1,400 years, over three continents, with three languages. And yet, there is not a single irreconcilable difference between any of the books or any of the words. And yet, it is entirely consistent with itself. It was written over that great span of time, yet not a single one of those authors introduced an idea that can't be supported by another author or that goes against what one of the other authors said. How can this be possible unless there is one author overseeing the writing of all of it? How can it be possible that all these men over all these cultures with all these languages and all these years can come together and produce one sound document that has no inconsistencies unless there's been one person orchestrating the writing of it all. And there are people who have dedicated their lives to tearing this book down. There are people who have dedicated their adult lives to finding imperfections in the text, to finding contradictions here that don't exist. There are emperors who have tried to burn it. There are societies who have tried to get rid of it. But the Bible stands the test of time. It's still here. It's still trustworthy. It's still the things that Jesus said back when he said them. And because of its consistency, we know that we can trust it. Finally, there's evidence. I won't get too far in the weeds on this, but do you know that the Bible, hundreds of years before it ever existed, I think Daniel is the one who primarily does this. Do you know the Bible predicts Alexander the Great and the Grecian Empire? And that the Bible predicts the Roman Empire? You know, we find artifacts all the time that show us that the stories in the Bible are true. I've been over to Israel and they take you from Jerusalem down this road through the valley of the shadow of death to get to this little town called Jericho. And if you know your old Bible, your old Bible, your Old Testament well, you'll know that Joshua marched around the walls of Jericho seven times and then the walls fell. And if you go to Jericho today and you look at where they've excavated the wall and you can see the layers of it all the way down to the very bottom, that when you get close to the bottom down there, that there is a layer about this thick of ash and char. I've seen it with my own eyes from the time Jericho was burned to the ground, just like it says in the book of Joshua. In the 60s, a mathematician put this experiment together, and I've always found it to be really interesting. It's not an experiment, it's just an illustration of the prophecies in the Old Testament. If you take all the prophecies in the Old Testament that are about the Messiah, that by his stripes he will be healed, that he will be born of a virgin, that he'll be from both Nazareth and Bethlehem, that he'll be from the line of David. If you take all of the prophecies that are made about Jesus in the Old Testament, that are made about this messianic figure in the Old Testament, and you try to have one life that could possibly fulfill all of those prophecies, that the statistical probability of that, of one person fulfilling all of the prophecies that Jesus fulfilled, is the same as covering the state of Texas a foot deep, it's either a foot deep or three feet deep, in silver dollars. You paint one of those silver dollars red and you just drop it in there with the rest of them. Then you get on a plane, you fly over Texas, you parachute down, you land on the coins, you bend down and you pick up the red one. There's the same chances of you doing that as there is of anyone ever living a life that fulfills all the prophecies that Jesus fulfilled. And yet, he lived it. Jesus bears out the truth of Scripture. We see in Jesus' life enough evidence to know that everything around that is true. So I think, and I've come to a place where I believe we can trust Scripture because we can trust the preservation of it, we can trust the consistency of it, and we can trust the evidence that bears out from it. Now, I'll tell you this, for the extra nerdy ones, I actually have a whole class that I developed that I did a lifetime ago in apologetics, and I have about 12 pages of notes. I only shared with you guys like four pages of notes this morning. If you want more on this stuff, if you want to go more in depth, let me know and I'll email that to you. If you have other questions, let me know and I will respond to those. But it feels appropriate to close out this sermon by offering you a little challenge. We've looked at the Bible. We've asked the questions. How can we trust it? Why is it such a big deal? It's the inspired word of God. It's a special revelation to us. We got it through a trustworthy series of events that have rendered it whole, and now we can trust it because of all the reasons that I just went through. And so it seems appropriate to issue this challenge to you in 2021. You may already be a couple days behind and that's all right, but here's the thing. Here's your challenge. I want to challenge you guys to read more of the Bible this year than you ever have before. That's the challenge. That's the challenge for us at Grace. I'm going to engage in that. I want to challenge you to read more of the Bible this year than you ever have before in a single year. That's going to mean different things for different people. You may be thinking to yourself, well, that's great. I've never read the Bible before. All right, well, then it's a low bar for you. Enjoy your success. I hope that it would continue. Set the bar higher for future years, but take a step. A lot of us are the kind of people who have sat down a bunch of times determined to read the Bible. Let this be the time that it sticks. Find a good pace that you can go at, a good rhythm for yourself. Let the Bible read itself to you. On the Bible app, you can have it read itself to you in your car or on your walk. I'm going to read through the Bible this year. I started last year and then I fell off the wagon. I'm going to make it my goal to read through the Bible this year. I'm just going to listen to the Bible this year in addition to what I'm reading on a regular basis. And it's worth stating that the Bible was actually written to be read aloud. So listening to it is a really good way to consume Scripture. If you're one who reads the Bible regularly, step it up. Let's let 2021 be the year that we read more of the Bible than we ever have. That's my challenge to you. All right, next week I'm going to come back and we're going to talk about this idea of Sabbath. What is it and why is it so important? But for now, I'm going to pray and we're going to close out the service with one more song. Pray with me. Father, we love you. Thank you so much for your word. Thank you that we can trust it. Thank you that we can build our lives on it. Thank you that it will never let us down. Thank you that it has stood the test of time and is trustworthy. Father, if we have any other questions about your word, give us the courage and the tenacity to seek those out. Give us the humility to accept what is true. Give us the clarity to reject what isn't. God, I pray once again that as we go throughout our weeks this week, that we would be people and instruments of peace for you in this country and a time when we need it so badly. God, thank you for your word. Make us students of it. Develop in us a hunger for it. In Jesus' name, amen.

It's good to get to be back with you in the saddle preaching live. I've been excited for this morning and I'm excited for this series. This series, Things You Should Know, I think that's what we're calling it. Yeah, it's right there on the screen next to me. Things You Should Know. I forgot what we named it back in the beginning of December, but I haven't forgotten what it's about. And it's based on this idea that there's things that we should all know as Christians, or that we at least nod along with as Christians, that we pretend that we know, that we may not actually know, right? Like there's a kind of a Christianese and another language that's spoken around churches. And I think sometimes we just kind of nod along with that because we don't want to look or feel dumb. And I know how it goes. I mean, you join a small group for the first time. You haven't really been involved in church in a while or just kind of cursory involvement. And then you show up in a small group and people start talking about stuff. And you might not know what they're talking about, but you don't want to feel dumb or silly or uninformed or make yourself look bad. So you don't say anything. And then you've been there so long that now I have to be one of the people that knows these things too. And so we just kind of nod along when people talk about grace and mercy or throw out Bible words like sanctification, and we just kind of act like we know what they're talking about when sometimes we really don't. And one of the things that I want you to know is that it's okay not to know stuff. It's actually really great to ask questions. One of my favorite things to do is to have my men's Bible study and have people in that study who are not very familiar with the text that we're covering because the questions that they ask are the best, but you have to be brave to ask questions because when you ask a question, you're admitting that I don't know this thing. And there's some stuff in the church that I think we nod along with, that we act like we know, when maybe we don't. And we want to be brave for you this month and ask those questions for you this month. And so this morning, the title of the sermon is simply the Bible. Questions that we might have about the Bible. I'm going to look at three questions that I think everybody has about Scripture that we might not know the answers to, but that I think every Christian should know. And now I'll warn you up front, this is not a normal sermon. This is far more informative. It's informational, this sermon is. The things that I'm going to share with you this morning are things that I wasn't exposed to until I was in Bible college, taking theology classes, or in grad school, in seminary, taking more theology classes. And there's a lot more to it than what we're going to cover this morning, but I wanted to take a morning, one Sunday, and address with you some common questions about the Bible, because again, I think every believer should know the answers to these questions. So I'll say up front, for some of you, you're going to love this. You're going to love it. Your notebook is out. You're ready. You're going to write these things down, and if you're a note taker, there's going to be a lot to write down. So get ready. Get your best possible pen. Some of you might not love this. This might not be your thing. And just to know, just for you to know, when I was praying before the sermon, my final words to God were, Father, make this helpful. And if it's not helpful, make it quick. Okay, so I'm with you. There's a lot of information, but I think you need to know this stuff, and I hope that you'll be interested in it. And actually, I want to know what you learned this morning. If I tell you something that you didn't know before, email me and tell me what you learned and tell me what you enjoyed. If there's other questions that you've always wanted to ask, email me and ask those questions. You can even tell me that I heard my friend ask this, so you don't even have to throw yourself under the bus. But get those questions to me. Get your responses to me. I want us to interact with the things we're talking about in this series. But I said I was going to give you three questions about the Bible that I think we should all be able to answer. And the first one is this. Why is the Bible a big deal? Why is the Bible such a big deal? Why do we make such a fuss about it? And it may seem like I'm going too simple on this, but I think it's an important question. Think about it. Think about where we place the Bible in our lives. I tell you guys all the time that there's no greater habit that anyone in their life could have than to read the Bible every day, than to spend time with God through prayer and in His Word every day. So we make a big deal out of the Bible. We hold the Bible up as the foremost authority in our lives. We believe and we teach at Grace that if you're walking with God, that you won't allow anything into your life until it's filtered through Scripture. That the biggest authority in your life of whether something is right or wrong or good or bad or from God or not is to go to Scripture and see what does it say. The entire church is built around the teachings of the Bible. Wars have been fought over it. People have died to preserve it. So it's worth asking the question, why is the Bible such a big deal? Well, the short answer is this. The Bible is a big deal because it's God's special revelation to us. We make such a fuss out of the Bible. The Bible is a big deal because it is God's special revelation to us. Now, here's what I mean. That word revelation, we're already getting into some technical Christian terms. That's not really a Christian term. That just means something that's revealed. It's the same root word there. It just means to reveal something. And so what we understand about ourselves and what you understand about you, whether you've ever thought about this or not, is that people can only know about you what you choose to reveal to them, right? If you meet somebody at a dinner party, you know you're never going to talk to them again. You can make up a totally false identity. They'll never know. You can tell them that you used to be a professional ball player. They won't know the difference. They'll Google you later. You won't exist, and it's fine. You'll never have that interaction again. But they only know about you what you choose to reveal about yourself. So when you meet someone in passing, it's just a cursory glance. They only know you by the way that you dress, by what you reveal, by how you present yourself to the world. The more someone is around you, the more they see you react and interact and respond, the more they learn about you and what's there. But again, people can only know about you what you choose to reveal to them about yourself, right? Well, the same is true of God. We can only know about God what he chooses to reveal about himself. And with him, it's in particular no more and no less. So with God, if we understand revelation to be what God chooses to reveal to us about himself, that we would get to know God the same way we would get to know anybody in our life, the same way other people would get to know us, then we have to understand that with God, there's two kinds of revelation. There's general revelation and special revelation. The way that I think about those is this. General revelation makes us aware of the presence of God, and special revelation gives us the details of that presence. General revelation is stuff that everybody can see. And Romans 1 actually sums up general revelation like this. This is what Paul says in Romans 1, looking at verse 19. He says, So he says, listen, God wrote himself in nature. Anybody who looks outward at nature, at the trees, at the seasons, at the rhythms of nature, the way the earth rotates around the sun, at how huge the universe is, at how small it can be, at the miracle of birth, at just the essence of life. As you look at nature, it points to a creator God. And as you look inward on what is written in your nature, it points to a creator God. Our moral compass, the fact that every civilization ever has prized bravery and bemoaned cowardice, has said that telling the truth is good and that being deceptive is bad. That moral code was written on our hearts by God. On our hearts, we have a longing for our Creator. So whether we look without or within, when we look at nature, God has written himself in nature. That is his general revelation, making all of us aware of his existence. But his special revelation, where he gives us the details of that existence, that's in the Bible. And here's what's incredible about that. What if we didn't have the Bible? What if we didn't know the details of this God that exists? Then he would just be to us this being that existed distant and cold, who had the authority to punish us, to start our life and to take our life, to manipulate circumstances to make us joyful or to make us miserable. It would be a God that we would hope to try to appease, but we wouldn't really know who he was. It would be a God that would inevitably incur fear and myth. But in God's goodness, he gave us the Bible. And it gives us the details of his existence. It's in his words that we find out, oh goodness, this God that created me loves me. This God that created me actually only created me so that I could spend eternity with him. That's how much he wants to be with me. This God who created me sent his son to die for me. This God who created me is love. He is goodness. He is gracious. He is merciful. This book tells us all we need to know about the God who created us. It is God's special revelation of himself to us. This is why we hold it in such high esteem. Because we believe that in these pages are the very words of God. And that this is, he could have chosen to reveal himself any way he wanted to, but what he chose to do is to reveal himself in the pages of Scripture. And in here we find him and who he is. It's an invitation to know our God better. That's why we make such a big deal out of the Bible. Now, the next question. And this one is important. I hope that some of you guys have asked this. I hope that some of you know some of the answers to this. But I think it's an important question. How did we even get the Bible? How did we get the Bible? How is it that I can go to the store and buy this, and these are the books that God wants in here, and these are the words that God wants in here, and these are the things that were written down however many years ago. How do we even get this? Because I don't know if you know this about the Bible, but the Bible is composed of an Old Testament and a New Testament. It totals 66 books. There's 39 in the Old Testament and 27 in the New Testament. And you may or may not know, I mean, you probably know that there's been a lot of people who have contributed to writing the Bible, but there's actually over 40 authors that contribute to the Bible. Did you know that the Bible was written over the span of about 1,400 years across three different continents, Africa and Asia and Europe? And that it was written actually in three different languages, Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic. And through all of that time, through the span of 1,400 years, through the minds of over 40 authors on three continents and however many different cultures that was, and in three different languages, God inspired this written word. So how did it get to us? It's a fair question. When we talk about how it got to us, we can really talk about it in the Old and the New Testament. The Old Testament is pretty easy. In ancient Israel, there was a ruling body called the Sanhedrin. That was a lot like our Senate. It was made up of different parties. The two most famous parties in the Sanhedrin were the Pharisees and the Sadducees. We've probably heard of those before, at least the Pharisees, I would think. And then there was other little parties that weren't as influential, but were there, the Essenes and the Zealots. You can think of those as like the modern day libertarians. I know that my friend Tom Sartorius will appreciate that very much. But the Sanhedrin was made up of different parties, and those parties ruled Israel. It was a religious rule, not too different from what we see in Muslim countries today. And the Sanhedrin got together somewhere around 250 BC, or maybe a little bit after, and one of the things that they affirmed was that the holy scriptures they had were the Holy Scriptures that would serve as the Old Testament. To them, it was 24 books that they called the Tanakh. To us, it's 39 books that we call the Old Testament, but they're the exact same. They grouped up a bunch of different books that we have separated out together, like Kings and Chronicles was one book, and now it's four. So they would group things together like that, but it's the same. Our 39 books are the same 24 books that they affirmed in 250 BC. And the Sanhedrin looked around and voted and they said, this is it. These are the Holy Scriptures. This is the Tanakh, the law and the prophets. In the New Testament, when we hear Jesus or one of the other writers refer to the law and the prophets, he's referring to the Old Testament, to the Tanakh. And that Old Testament has not been changed since 250 BC when they affirmed it. And the last book was Malachi, and it was written around 400 BC. So it had already existed as one big volume of works for at least 150 years before they ever addressed it. It hasn't changed since 400 BC, and it's not going to change in the future. The Old Testament is done, and that's how we got it. Now, the New Testament is interesting too, because at the time of Christ, there was a lot of writings. There's a lot of people writing a lot of different things. And after Christ left the scene, there was one universal church. We call it the Catholic Church. And the Catholic Church was structured. They say that there was a pope in the line of succession of Peter, that there was the next guy who was in charge of the church, and the next guy after that. And then there's bishops all that fan out depending on where the church is based on geography. And every now and again, they would have what was called councils. And all the leaders from all the different churches and parishes, I suppose, and all the different areas would get together in this one city and they would debate theological ideas. And they would decide, this is something that the whole church believes. This is something that we are going to cast aside. An example of this is the Council of Nicaea, where they decided without a doubt that Christ is God. Before that, there was some disagreement in the church. Some people thought that Christ was simply a man, that he was a prophet, like the Islam religion claims that he is. Other people say, no, he is deity. He is God incarnate in the flesh. So they got together, they talked about it, they voted on it, and they decided moving forward, the Christian church believes that Jesus is the Son of God. It's a really pivotal council, and we still affirm that. But what we find is that towards about 393 and 398, there was two councils, the Council of Hippo and the Council of Carthage, where those people got together and they voted on what books were going to be included in the New Testament. This is called the canonization of Scripture, the complete, done, codified work. And they voted on which books would be included. And what's important to point out here is it wasn't like they all brought 60 books to the table and then they slowly whittled it down to these 27. They voted on the 27 books that we commonly accept as Scripture that were commonly accepted then. All they did is agree on what was essentially already agreed upon. If you don't believe me, I actually have a quote this morning. I don't do this a lot, okay? I don't belabor things like this a lot because I think they're boring and no one cares. But I think this morning it's important. I've got a quote for you by a guy named F.F. Bruce. You know he's important because he doesn't use a name. It's just his initials. And in the church world, that means you're super smart and also pretentious. Get over yourself, F.F. But F.F. Bruce said this about the councils, and I think it's great. Read with me here. That's a big, long, fancy way of saying they didn't introduce any new ideas. All they did is put a rubber stamp on, yep, these are the books that we hold as Holy Scripture. And it's the same 27 books that we have today. They affirmed 27 books in the New Testament. We have those same 27 books now. So that's how we got the Old Testament and the New Testament. You may want to know, another question you should ask is, how did they determine which books were allowed in? What was the criteria? Well, for a book to be included in the canon, it had to be apostolic, harmonious, accepted, and inspired. Again, for a book to be included in the New Testament, it had to meet these requirements. It had to be apostolic, had to be harmonious, had to be commonly accepted, and it had to be inspired. And when I say apostolic, what I mean is this. An apostle is someone who has an eyewitness account of Christ. So for a book to be apostolic, it has to be written by someone who has seen Jesus in the flesh, which is a really easy way to say that the canon is closed. Can God appear to somebody and speak to someone and ask them to write something down on his behalf? Sure he could if he wanted to, but he doesn't do that anymore in a way that's going to be included in Scripture. We're not going to add to the Bible because one of the ways to get included in the New Testament is to be someone who's an eyewitness of Christ. And since all those people are dead, we're not accepting any more entries in the Bible. It has to be harmonious, meaning it has to agree with other books that are accepted in Scripture. It can't disagree with the Tanakh. It can't disagree with the teachings in the Old Testament. It can't disagree with the teachings and the quotes of Jesus. The Gospels were the first New Testament books written, so it can't disagree with any of those. It has to be in harmony with the rest of the books included. It's got to be accepted, meaning there's no surprises at these councils. Nobody brought this thing that was written down by somebody else and said, hey, would you consider this? The books that were agreed upon in Hippo and in Carthage were books that everybody was already familiar with, that those guys had taught their congregations out of many, many times. They were commonly accepted books. And then they had to be inspired. And really, the first three things are ways to determine if they felt like it was inspired by God. And this is an important word. We talk about the Bible being inspired. But I don't know how often we talk about what that means. Did God take over the minds of these men and these women and they wrote it down verbatim as the Holy Spirit spoke it to them? Was God basically dictating to them what the Bible was supposed to say? The way that we think about inspiration and how it works, and I hold this with a loose hand because it's hard to be certain how inspiration works. The only people who can explain it to us are people who never wrote the Bible. So it's just guesses. But the fancy word for it, if you're interested in such a thing, is verbal plenary inspiration. And basically what it means is the Holy Spirit guides your thoughts and your ideas and then your personality and your intellect takes over and expresses those things. So the Holy Spirit's gonna present an idea to Paul and he's gonna write it out and it's gonna look a lot different than when James writes something out or when David writes something out or when Solomon writes something out. It's almost like if you were to go to the field next to the church. Now, a lot of you haven't been here in so long that you've forgotten that there's a field over there, but there is. It'd be like going to that field and telling you to take a lap once in an SUV and once in a sports car. The journey is going to be the same. The lap's going to be the same, but the experience in that lap is going to be different based, and that lap is going to be different based on the car that you took. It's going to feel different in the SUV. It's going to get done in a different amount of time. It's going to feel different in the sports car. It's the same way with translation and or with inspiration. God speaks to one person, and the way that that person writes it down is going to be different than the way that this person writes it down. But the path and the impact and the point are the same. So in that way, God breathed Scripture into these authors by directing their thoughts and directing their hearts and their heads to the ideas that he wanted them to write down. So it's not unless a book is inspired, is harmonious, is accepted, and is apostolic do we include it in the New Testament. That's how we got our Bible. And the last question I want to address today is how do we know we can trust it? And this is an important question. How do we know that this book that I hold in my hands is the same book, that these 39 books are the exact same as they were when they got approved by the Sanhedrin in 250 BC? How do I know that when I quote Genesis, it's the same Genesis that Jesus is quoting? How do I know that when I read the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew 2,000 years later, that those are the actual words that Jesus spoke? How do I know that the letter that Paul wrote to Romans has been preserved enough over the years so that when I open up Romans 1, 19 through 20 and read to you what Paul said, that it's the same thing the church in the first century was hearing? How do we know that we can trust this book? It's an important question. I would think that there's really three main factors that help us understand how we can trust the Bible. The three biggest reasons we can trust the Bible we hold in our hands are preservation, consistency, and evidence. The three biggest reasons that I know we can trust this are preservation, consistency, and evidence. Here's what I mean. You guys may not know this. I find this fascinating. If you don't find this fascinating, I'm sorry. We're talking about Sabbath next week, and I'm real excited for it. But the preservation of Scripture, to me, is so crucial and interesting and vital that it's worth understanding how it happened. You may remember from reading the New Testament that sometimes there's these two groups of people that are put together, the scribes and the Pharisees. What you may not know is that to be a scribe was actually a full-on religious profession. It was a whole profession to be a scribe. And the whole job of a scribe is not necessarily to write new things, but to simply copy things that existed. The only way to get more copies of the book of Genesis is for someone to sit down and painstakingly copy by hand the book of Genesis, right? Gutenberg hadn't been around yet. We didn't have copiers, so we had to write things down by hand. And the process of doing this was excruciatingly detailed. And again, these are men, it was just men in that day, who have dedicated their entire lives to copying Scripture. And they had very strict rules around how they did it. The foremost rule that I've always appreciated is if they made a single mistake at all, no scratching out and moving on and writing a little note about what you meant, any mistake in the manuscript, you destroyed the whole thing. You burned the whole thing. Now listen, we might think, oh gosh, that sounds tedious at first, but I don't think you understand how tedious. Think about if I asked you, if it was your job in 2021 to hand copy the book of Genesis to perfection. Take the book of Genesis. It's about 50 chapters. I want you to write it out word for word. I want you to look at it in your Bible and I want you to write it down. You have to write it down in such a way that it's going to be legible and easy to read in a hundred years. There can't be anybody a hundred years from now that can't tell if that's a G or a C or an E or an F. It needs to be clear and legible. And if there's a single mistake at all, if you put a comma in the wrong part, if you put the quotations outside the period and they should be inside the period, whatever you do, if there's any mistakes, you have to destroy it and start over. Can you imagine how frustrating it would be to nail 43 chapters and in the 44th chapter you write a T instead of an S and you have to destroy the whole thing? That's what they would do. That's how serious they were about this work. Whenever they would approach the word Yahweh, they would stop and get up from their desk and put their pen down and go and wash their hands and pray a prayer and make sure they were ceremonially clean before they would write it down. When they would finish a document to check it, they knew exactly how many words were in the book. If we're using Genesis, they knew exactly how many words were in Genesis. So they'd finish it. It's perfect. It's two years of effort. And then they would start the counting. And they knew how many words had to be in their manuscript and how many words were in the original one. They knew that. And if it was wrong, if the count was off by one word, no matter what, you destroy those years of effort and you start over. They knew the middle word. If there's 50,000 words, they knew the 25,000th word. And they would count to it. And then in the new manuscript, they would count back to it. And if the middle word didn't match up, they would destroy the copy as imperfect. And it seems tedious, and maybe it seems over the top, but here's the thing. It worked. And we get affirmations every so often of just how well it worked. I won't chase this rabbit hole too much because it gets into the weeds, but suffice it to say that in terms of manuscripts, the older ones you can find, the better off you are. The older you can find it, the closer to the original it is, right? If you find some manuscripts that are 1,000 years old, that means that things were written 1,000 years before that. They're a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy, right? But if you can find something that's 1,800 years old, so the original was only written 200 years before that, well, now it's a copy of a copy. So the older it is, the more accurate it is. And there have been multiple times in the Christian world where we have translated our Bibles based on the oldest manuscripts that we could find and translated them all out and had them and they've been published and on the shelves for us to pick up and read. And then something will happen, like what happened with the Dead Sea Scrolls, I believe in the 1930s. And they'll find these scrolls that predate the ones that we've already found. They're actually older than the oldest ones that we have. And so then they frantically check, oh my gosh, these ones that we have, are they accurate to the older ones? And what they found out is that within 99.9%, they're accurate. That the newer ones we have are accurate to the old ones that we find every couple of years. Which means that this preservation, over time, it worked. It's accurate. The words that we read here are the very ones that were written by Paul, are the very things that were said by Jesus, are the very words of David that were quoted by Matthew. The words that we read are the ones that are written. This has been proven over and over again. We can also trust the Bible because of its consistency, because of how unified its message is. I've told you already that it was written by over 40 authors over the span of 1,400 years, over three continents, with three languages. And yet, there is not a single irreconcilable difference between any of the books or any of the words. And yet, it is entirely consistent with itself. It was written over that great span of time, yet not a single one of those authors introduced an idea that can't be supported by another author or that goes against what one of the other authors said. How can this be possible unless there is one author overseeing the writing of all of it? How can it be possible that all these men over all these cultures with all these languages and all these years can come together and produce one sound document that has no inconsistencies unless there's been one person orchestrating the writing of it all. And there are people who have dedicated their lives to tearing this book down. There are people who have dedicated their adult lives to finding imperfections in the text, to finding contradictions here that don't exist. There are emperors who have tried to burn it. There are societies who have tried to get rid of it. But the Bible stands the test of time. It's still here. It's still trustworthy. It's still the things that Jesus said back when he said them. And because of its consistency, we know that we can trust it. Finally, there's evidence. I won't get too far in the weeds on this, but do you know that the Bible, hundreds of years before it ever existed, I think Daniel is the one who primarily does this. Do you know the Bible predicts Alexander the Great and the Grecian Empire? And that the Bible predicts the Roman Empire? You know, we find artifacts all the time that show us that the stories in the Bible are true. I've been over to Israel and they take you from Jerusalem down this road through the valley of the shadow of death to get to this little town called Jericho. And if you know your old Bible, your old Bible, your Old Testament well, you'll know that Joshua marched around the walls of Jericho seven times and then the walls fell. And if you go to Jericho today and you look at where they've excavated the wall and you can see the layers of it all the way down to the very bottom, that when you get close to the bottom down there, that there is a layer about this thick of ash and char. I've seen it with my own eyes from the time Jericho was burned to the ground, just like it says in the book of Joshua. In the 60s, a mathematician put this experiment together, and I've always found it to be really interesting. It's not an experiment, it's just an illustration of the prophecies in the Old Testament. If you take all the prophecies in the Old Testament that are about the Messiah, that by his stripes he will be healed, that he will be born of a virgin, that he'll be from both Nazareth and Bethlehem, that he'll be from the line of David. If you take all of the prophecies that are made about Jesus in the Old Testament, that are made about this messianic figure in the Old Testament, and you try to have one life that could possibly fulfill all of those prophecies, that the statistical probability of that, of one person fulfilling all of the prophecies that Jesus fulfilled, is the same as covering the state of Texas a foot deep, it's either a foot deep or three feet deep, in silver dollars. You paint one of those silver dollars red and you just drop it in there with the rest of them. Then you get on a plane, you fly over Texas, you parachute down, you land on the coins, you bend down and you pick up the red one. There's the same chances of you doing that as there is of anyone ever living a life that fulfills all the prophecies that Jesus fulfilled. And yet, he lived it. Jesus bears out the truth of Scripture. We see in Jesus' life enough evidence to know that everything around that is true. So I think, and I've come to a place where I believe we can trust Scripture because we can trust the preservation of it, we can trust the consistency of it, and we can trust the evidence that bears out from it. Now, I'll tell you this, for the extra nerdy ones, I actually have a whole class that I developed that I did a lifetime ago in apologetics, and I have about 12 pages of notes. I only shared with you guys like four pages of notes this morning. If you want more on this stuff, if you want to go more in depth, let me know and I'll email that to you. If you have other questions, let me know and I will respond to those. But it feels appropriate to close out this sermon by offering you a little challenge. We've looked at the Bible. We've asked the questions. How can we trust it? Why is it such a big deal? It's the inspired word of God. It's a special revelation to us. We got it through a trustworthy series of events that have rendered it whole, and now we can trust it because of all the reasons that I just went through. And so it seems appropriate to issue this challenge to you in 2021. You may already be a couple days behind and that's all right, but here's the thing. Here's your challenge. I want to challenge you guys to read more of the Bible this year than you ever have before. That's the challenge. That's the challenge for us at Grace. I'm going to engage in that. I want to challenge you to read more of the Bible this year than you ever have before in a single year. That's going to mean different things for different people. You may be thinking to yourself, well, that's great. I've never read the Bible before. All right, well, then it's a low bar for you. Enjoy your success. I hope that it would continue. Set the bar higher for future years, but take a step. A lot of us are the kind of people who have sat down a bunch of times determined to read the Bible. Let this be the time that it sticks. Find a good pace that you can go at, a good rhythm for yourself. Let the Bible read itself to you. On the Bible app, you can have it read itself to you in your car or on your walk. I'm going to read through the Bible this year. I started last year and then I fell off the wagon. I'm going to make it my goal to read through the Bible this year. I'm just going to listen to the Bible this year in addition to what I'm reading on a regular basis. And it's worth stating that the Bible was actually written to be read aloud. So listening to it is a really good way to consume Scripture. If you're one who reads the Bible regularly, step it up. Let's let 2021 be the year that we read more of the Bible than we ever have. That's my challenge to you. All right, next week I'm going to come back and we're going to talk about this idea of Sabbath. What is it and why is it so important? But for now, I'm going to pray and we're going to close out the service with one more song. Pray with me. Father, we love you. Thank you so much for your word. Thank you that we can trust it. Thank you that we can build our lives on it. Thank you that it will never let us down. Thank you that it has stood the test of time and is trustworthy. Father, if we have any other questions about your word, give us the courage and the tenacity to seek those out. Give us the humility to accept what is true. Give us the clarity to reject what isn't. God, I pray once again that as we go throughout our weeks this week, that we would be people and instruments of peace for you in this country and a time when we need it so badly. God, thank you for your word. Make us students of it. Develop in us a hunger for it. In Jesus' name, amen.